The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study

I. A. Janssens, A. Freibauer, B. Schlamadinger, R. Ceulemans, P. Ciais, H. Dolman, M. Heimann, G. J. Nabuurs, Peter Smith, R. Valentini, E. D. Schulze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We summed estimates of the carbon balance of forests, grasslands, arable lands and peatlands to obtain country-specific estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance during the 1990s. Forests and grasslands were a net sink for carbon, whereas croplands were carbon sources in all European countries. Hence, countries dominated by arable lands tended to be losing carbon from their terrestrial ecosystems, whereas forest-dominated countries tended to be sequestering carbon. In some countries, draining and extraction of peatlands caused substantial reductions in the net carbon balance.

Net terrestrial carbon balances were typically an order of magnitude smaller than the fossil fuel-related carbon emissions. Exceptions to this overall picture were countries where population density and industrialization are small. It is, however, of utmost importance to acknowledge that the typically small net carbon balance represents the small difference between two large but opposing fluxes: uptake by forests and grasslands and losses from arable lands and peatlands. This suggests that relatively small changes in either or both of these large component fluxes could induce large effects on the net total, indicating that mitigation schemes should not be discarded a priori.

In the absence of carbon-oriented land management, the current net carbon uptake is bound to decline soon. Protecting it will require actions at three levels; a) maintaining the current sink activity of forests, b) altered agricultural management practices to reduce the emissions from arable soils or turn into carbon sinks and c) protecting current large reservoirs (wetlands and old forests), since carbon is lost more rapidly than sequestered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-27
Number of pages12
JournalBiogeosciences
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • NORWAY SPRUCE
  • FOREST
  • MODEL
  • SINK
  • FLUX
  • METHODOLOGY
  • EMISSIONS
  • BALANCE
  • STORAGE
  • POOLS

Cite this

Janssens, I. A., Freibauer, A., Schlamadinger, B., Ceulemans, R., Ciais, P., Dolman, H., ... Schulze, E. D. (2005). The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study. Biogeosciences, 2, 15-27.

The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study. / Janssens, I. A.; Freibauer, A.; Schlamadinger, B.; Ceulemans, R.; Ciais, P.; Dolman, H.; Heimann, M.; Nabuurs, G. J.; Smith, Peter; Valentini, R.; Schulze, E. D.

In: Biogeosciences, Vol. 2, 2005, p. 15-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Janssens, IA, Freibauer, A, Schlamadinger, B, Ceulemans, R, Ciais, P, Dolman, H, Heimann, M, Nabuurs, GJ, Smith, P, Valentini, R & Schulze, ED 2005, 'The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study', Biogeosciences, vol. 2, pp. 15-27.
Janssens IA, Freibauer A, Schlamadinger B, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman H et al. The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study. Biogeosciences. 2005;2:15-27.
Janssens, I. A. ; Freibauer, A. ; Schlamadinger, B. ; Ceulemans, R. ; Ciais, P. ; Dolman, H. ; Heimann, M. ; Nabuurs, G. J. ; Smith, Peter ; Valentini, R. ; Schulze, E. D. / The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study. In: Biogeosciences. 2005 ; Vol. 2. pp. 15-27.
@article{b0732abd57ce4ff587ae5fb0533bfb85,
title = "The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study",
abstract = "We summed estimates of the carbon balance of forests, grasslands, arable lands and peatlands to obtain country-specific estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance during the 1990s. Forests and grasslands were a net sink for carbon, whereas croplands were carbon sources in all European countries. Hence, countries dominated by arable lands tended to be losing carbon from their terrestrial ecosystems, whereas forest-dominated countries tended to be sequestering carbon. In some countries, draining and extraction of peatlands caused substantial reductions in the net carbon balance.Net terrestrial carbon balances were typically an order of magnitude smaller than the fossil fuel-related carbon emissions. Exceptions to this overall picture were countries where population density and industrialization are small. It is, however, of utmost importance to acknowledge that the typically small net carbon balance represents the small difference between two large but opposing fluxes: uptake by forests and grasslands and losses from arable lands and peatlands. This suggests that relatively small changes in either or both of these large component fluxes could induce large effects on the net total, indicating that mitigation schemes should not be discarded a priori.In the absence of carbon-oriented land management, the current net carbon uptake is bound to decline soon. Protecting it will require actions at three levels; a) maintaining the current sink activity of forests, b) altered agricultural management practices to reduce the emissions from arable soils or turn into carbon sinks and c) protecting current large reservoirs (wetlands and old forests), since carbon is lost more rapidly than sequestered.",
keywords = "NORWAY SPRUCE, FOREST, MODEL, SINK, FLUX, METHODOLOGY, EMISSIONS, BALANCE, STORAGE, POOLS",
author = "Janssens, {I. A.} and A. Freibauer and B. Schlamadinger and R. Ceulemans and P. Ciais and H. Dolman and M. Heimann and Nabuurs, {G. J.} and Peter Smith and R. Valentini and Schulze, {E. D.}",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "15--27",
journal = "Biogeosciences",
issn = "1726-4170",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale. A European case study

AU - Janssens, I. A.

AU - Freibauer, A.

AU - Schlamadinger, B.

AU - Ceulemans, R.

AU - Ciais, P.

AU - Dolman, H.

AU - Heimann, M.

AU - Nabuurs, G. J.

AU - Smith, Peter

AU - Valentini, R.

AU - Schulze, E. D.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - We summed estimates of the carbon balance of forests, grasslands, arable lands and peatlands to obtain country-specific estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance during the 1990s. Forests and grasslands were a net sink for carbon, whereas croplands were carbon sources in all European countries. Hence, countries dominated by arable lands tended to be losing carbon from their terrestrial ecosystems, whereas forest-dominated countries tended to be sequestering carbon. In some countries, draining and extraction of peatlands caused substantial reductions in the net carbon balance.Net terrestrial carbon balances were typically an order of magnitude smaller than the fossil fuel-related carbon emissions. Exceptions to this overall picture were countries where population density and industrialization are small. It is, however, of utmost importance to acknowledge that the typically small net carbon balance represents the small difference between two large but opposing fluxes: uptake by forests and grasslands and losses from arable lands and peatlands. This suggests that relatively small changes in either or both of these large component fluxes could induce large effects on the net total, indicating that mitigation schemes should not be discarded a priori.In the absence of carbon-oriented land management, the current net carbon uptake is bound to decline soon. Protecting it will require actions at three levels; a) maintaining the current sink activity of forests, b) altered agricultural management practices to reduce the emissions from arable soils or turn into carbon sinks and c) protecting current large reservoirs (wetlands and old forests), since carbon is lost more rapidly than sequestered.

AB - We summed estimates of the carbon balance of forests, grasslands, arable lands and peatlands to obtain country-specific estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance during the 1990s. Forests and grasslands were a net sink for carbon, whereas croplands were carbon sources in all European countries. Hence, countries dominated by arable lands tended to be losing carbon from their terrestrial ecosystems, whereas forest-dominated countries tended to be sequestering carbon. In some countries, draining and extraction of peatlands caused substantial reductions in the net carbon balance.Net terrestrial carbon balances were typically an order of magnitude smaller than the fossil fuel-related carbon emissions. Exceptions to this overall picture were countries where population density and industrialization are small. It is, however, of utmost importance to acknowledge that the typically small net carbon balance represents the small difference between two large but opposing fluxes: uptake by forests and grasslands and losses from arable lands and peatlands. This suggests that relatively small changes in either or both of these large component fluxes could induce large effects on the net total, indicating that mitigation schemes should not be discarded a priori.In the absence of carbon-oriented land management, the current net carbon uptake is bound to decline soon. Protecting it will require actions at three levels; a) maintaining the current sink activity of forests, b) altered agricultural management practices to reduce the emissions from arable soils or turn into carbon sinks and c) protecting current large reservoirs (wetlands and old forests), since carbon is lost more rapidly than sequestered.

KW - NORWAY SPRUCE

KW - FOREST

KW - MODEL

KW - SINK

KW - FLUX

KW - METHODOLOGY

KW - EMISSIONS

KW - BALANCE

KW - STORAGE

KW - POOLS

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 15

EP - 27

JO - Biogeosciences

JF - Biogeosciences

SN - 1726-4170

ER -