The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2

quantification of the nutritional phenotype

Ben van Ommen, Jaap Keijer, Robert Kleemann, Ruan Elliott, Christian A. Drevon, Harry J McArdle, Mike Gibney, Michael Muller

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In quantifying the beneficial effect of dietary interventions in healthy subjects, nutrition research meets a number of new challenges. Inter individual variation in biomarker values often is larger than the effect related to the intervention. Healthy subjects have a remarkable capacity to maintain homeostasis, both through direct metabolic regulation, metabolic compensation of altered diets, and effective defence and repair mechanisms in oxidative and inflammatory stress. Processes involved in these regulatory activities essentially different from processes involved in early onset of diet related diseases. So, new concepts and approaches are needed to better quantify the subtle effects possibly achieved by dietary interventions in healthy subjects. Apart from quantification of the genotype and food intake ( these are discussed in separate reviews in this series), four major areas of innovation are discussed: the biomarker profile concept, perturbation of homeostasis combined with omics analysis, imaging, modelling and fluxes. All of these areas contribute to a better understanding and quantification of the nutritional phenotype.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-59
Number of pages9
JournalGenes & Nutrition
Volume3
Issue number2
Early online date25 Jun 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

Keywords

  • nutritional phenotype
  • homeostasis
  • perturbation
  • imaging
  • c-reactive protein
  • gene-expression profiles
  • blood mononuclear-cells
  • in-vivo
  • cardiovascular-disease
  • developmental origins
  • healthy-volunteers
  • metabolic syndrome
  • body-temperature
  • systems biology
  • Homeostasis
  • Perturbation
  • Imaging

Cite this

The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2 : quantification of the nutritional phenotype . / van Ommen, Ben; Keijer, Jaap; Kleemann, Robert; Elliott, Ruan; Drevon, Christian A.; McArdle, Harry J; Gibney, Mike; Muller, Michael.

In: Genes & Nutrition, Vol. 3, No. 2, 07.2008, p. 51-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

van Ommen, B, Keijer, J, Kleemann, R, Elliott, R, Drevon, CA, McArdle, HJ, Gibney, M & Muller, M 2008, 'The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2: quantification of the nutritional phenotype ', Genes & Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-008-0084-3
van Ommen, Ben ; Keijer, Jaap ; Kleemann, Robert ; Elliott, Ruan ; Drevon, Christian A. ; McArdle, Harry J ; Gibney, Mike ; Muller, Michael. / The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2 : quantification of the nutritional phenotype . In: Genes & Nutrition. 2008 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 51-59.
@article{486b59068ece4829b464c915a518d9dc,
title = "The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2: quantification of the nutritional phenotype",
abstract = "In quantifying the beneficial effect of dietary interventions in healthy subjects, nutrition research meets a number of new challenges. Inter individual variation in biomarker values often is larger than the effect related to the intervention. Healthy subjects have a remarkable capacity to maintain homeostasis, both through direct metabolic regulation, metabolic compensation of altered diets, and effective defence and repair mechanisms in oxidative and inflammatory stress. Processes involved in these regulatory activities essentially different from processes involved in early onset of diet related diseases. So, new concepts and approaches are needed to better quantify the subtle effects possibly achieved by dietary interventions in healthy subjects. Apart from quantification of the genotype and food intake ( these are discussed in separate reviews in this series), four major areas of innovation are discussed: the biomarker profile concept, perturbation of homeostasis combined with omics analysis, imaging, modelling and fluxes. All of these areas contribute to a better understanding and quantification of the nutritional phenotype.",
keywords = "nutritional phenotype, homeostasis, perturbation, imaging, c-reactive protein, gene-expression profiles, blood mononuclear-cells, in-vivo, cardiovascular-disease, developmental origins, healthy-volunteers, metabolic syndrome, body-temperature, systems biology, Homeostasis, Perturbation, Imaging",
author = "{van Ommen}, Ben and Jaap Keijer and Robert Kleemann and Ruan Elliott and Drevon, {Christian A.} and McArdle, {Harry J} and Mike Gibney and Michael Muller",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s12263-008-0084-3",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "51--59",
journal = "Genes & Nutrition",
issn = "1555-8932",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The challenges for molecular nutrition research 2

T2 - quantification of the nutritional phenotype

AU - van Ommen, Ben

AU - Keijer, Jaap

AU - Kleemann, Robert

AU - Elliott, Ruan

AU - Drevon, Christian A.

AU - McArdle, Harry J

AU - Gibney, Mike

AU - Muller, Michael

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - In quantifying the beneficial effect of dietary interventions in healthy subjects, nutrition research meets a number of new challenges. Inter individual variation in biomarker values often is larger than the effect related to the intervention. Healthy subjects have a remarkable capacity to maintain homeostasis, both through direct metabolic regulation, metabolic compensation of altered diets, and effective defence and repair mechanisms in oxidative and inflammatory stress. Processes involved in these regulatory activities essentially different from processes involved in early onset of diet related diseases. So, new concepts and approaches are needed to better quantify the subtle effects possibly achieved by dietary interventions in healthy subjects. Apart from quantification of the genotype and food intake ( these are discussed in separate reviews in this series), four major areas of innovation are discussed: the biomarker profile concept, perturbation of homeostasis combined with omics analysis, imaging, modelling and fluxes. All of these areas contribute to a better understanding and quantification of the nutritional phenotype.

AB - In quantifying the beneficial effect of dietary interventions in healthy subjects, nutrition research meets a number of new challenges. Inter individual variation in biomarker values often is larger than the effect related to the intervention. Healthy subjects have a remarkable capacity to maintain homeostasis, both through direct metabolic regulation, metabolic compensation of altered diets, and effective defence and repair mechanisms in oxidative and inflammatory stress. Processes involved in these regulatory activities essentially different from processes involved in early onset of diet related diseases. So, new concepts and approaches are needed to better quantify the subtle effects possibly achieved by dietary interventions in healthy subjects. Apart from quantification of the genotype and food intake ( these are discussed in separate reviews in this series), four major areas of innovation are discussed: the biomarker profile concept, perturbation of homeostasis combined with omics analysis, imaging, modelling and fluxes. All of these areas contribute to a better understanding and quantification of the nutritional phenotype.

KW - nutritional phenotype

KW - homeostasis

KW - perturbation

KW - imaging

KW - c-reactive protein

KW - gene-expression profiles

KW - blood mononuclear-cells

KW - in-vivo

KW - cardiovascular-disease

KW - developmental origins

KW - healthy-volunteers

KW - metabolic syndrome

KW - body-temperature

KW - systems biology

KW - Homeostasis

KW - Perturbation

KW - Imaging

U2 - 10.1007/s12263-008-0084-3

DO - 10.1007/s12263-008-0084-3

M3 - Literature review

VL - 3

SP - 51

EP - 59

JO - Genes & Nutrition

JF - Genes & Nutrition

SN - 1555-8932

IS - 2

ER -