The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns

1987-2002

Stephen Lee, Steven Patrick Devaney

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A stylized fact in the real estate diversification literature is that sector (property type) effects are relatively more important than regional (geographical) factors in determining property returns. Thus, for those portfolio managers who follow a top-down approach to portfolio management, they should first choose which sectors to invest in and then select the best properties in each market. However, the question arises as to whether the dominance of sector effects over regional effects is constant. If not, property fund managers will need to take account of regional effects in developing their portfolio strategy. Using monthly returns data for individual properties over the period 1987:1 to 2002:12, this paper investigates the influence of sector and regional factors on commercial real estate performance, first by adopting the dummy variable approach of Heston and Rouwenhorst (1994, 1995) and then by using the notion of cross-sectional dispersion introduced by Solnik and Roulet (2000). The results show that sector-specific dominate region-specific factors for the majority of the time and, in particular, during volatile periods of the real estate cycle. However, during calmer periods, sector and regional effects appear to be of equal importance. Overall, sector effects are still the most important aspect in the development of an active portfolio strategy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)55-69
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Property Research
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

    Fingerprint

    regional factors
    real estate
    portfolio management
    manager
    geographical factors
    top-down approach
    diversification
    effect
    market
    performance

    Keywords

    • property returns
    • sector and regional effects
    • dummy variable regressions
    • dispersion indices
    • HP-filter

    Cite this

    The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns : 1987-2002. / Lee, Stephen; Devaney, Steven Patrick.

    In: Journal of Property Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 55-69.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Lee, Stephen ; Devaney, Steven Patrick. / The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns : 1987-2002. In: Journal of Property Research. 2007 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 55-69.
    @article{53f11171170d4c6f9e0fc03aebf915b9,
    title = "The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns: 1987-2002",
    abstract = "A stylized fact in the real estate diversification literature is that sector (property type) effects are relatively more important than regional (geographical) factors in determining property returns. Thus, for those portfolio managers who follow a top-down approach to portfolio management, they should first choose which sectors to invest in and then select the best properties in each market. However, the question arises as to whether the dominance of sector effects over regional effects is constant. If not, property fund managers will need to take account of regional effects in developing their portfolio strategy. Using monthly returns data for individual properties over the period 1987:1 to 2002:12, this paper investigates the influence of sector and regional factors on commercial real estate performance, first by adopting the dummy variable approach of Heston and Rouwenhorst (1994, 1995) and then by using the notion of cross-sectional dispersion introduced by Solnik and Roulet (2000). The results show that sector-specific dominate region-specific factors for the majority of the time and, in particular, during volatile periods of the real estate cycle. However, during calmer periods, sector and regional effects appear to be of equal importance. Overall, sector effects are still the most important aspect in the development of an active portfolio strategy.",
    keywords = "property returns, sector and regional effects, dummy variable regressions, dispersion indices, HP-filter",
    author = "Stephen Lee and Devaney, {Steven Patrick}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1080/09599910701297671",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "55--69",
    journal = "Journal of Property Research",
    issn = "0959-9916",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns

    T2 - 1987-2002

    AU - Lee, Stephen

    AU - Devaney, Steven Patrick

    PY - 2007/3

    Y1 - 2007/3

    N2 - A stylized fact in the real estate diversification literature is that sector (property type) effects are relatively more important than regional (geographical) factors in determining property returns. Thus, for those portfolio managers who follow a top-down approach to portfolio management, they should first choose which sectors to invest in and then select the best properties in each market. However, the question arises as to whether the dominance of sector effects over regional effects is constant. If not, property fund managers will need to take account of regional effects in developing their portfolio strategy. Using monthly returns data for individual properties over the period 1987:1 to 2002:12, this paper investigates the influence of sector and regional factors on commercial real estate performance, first by adopting the dummy variable approach of Heston and Rouwenhorst (1994, 1995) and then by using the notion of cross-sectional dispersion introduced by Solnik and Roulet (2000). The results show that sector-specific dominate region-specific factors for the majority of the time and, in particular, during volatile periods of the real estate cycle. However, during calmer periods, sector and regional effects appear to be of equal importance. Overall, sector effects are still the most important aspect in the development of an active portfolio strategy.

    AB - A stylized fact in the real estate diversification literature is that sector (property type) effects are relatively more important than regional (geographical) factors in determining property returns. Thus, for those portfolio managers who follow a top-down approach to portfolio management, they should first choose which sectors to invest in and then select the best properties in each market. However, the question arises as to whether the dominance of sector effects over regional effects is constant. If not, property fund managers will need to take account of regional effects in developing their portfolio strategy. Using monthly returns data for individual properties over the period 1987:1 to 2002:12, this paper investigates the influence of sector and regional factors on commercial real estate performance, first by adopting the dummy variable approach of Heston and Rouwenhorst (1994, 1995) and then by using the notion of cross-sectional dispersion introduced by Solnik and Roulet (2000). The results show that sector-specific dominate region-specific factors for the majority of the time and, in particular, during volatile periods of the real estate cycle. However, during calmer periods, sector and regional effects appear to be of equal importance. Overall, sector effects are still the most important aspect in the development of an active portfolio strategy.

    KW - property returns

    KW - sector and regional effects

    KW - dummy variable regressions

    KW - dispersion indices

    KW - HP-filter

    U2 - 10.1080/09599910701297671

    DO - 10.1080/09599910701297671

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 55

    EP - 69

    JO - Journal of Property Research

    JF - Journal of Property Research

    SN - 0959-9916

    IS - 1

    ER -