The changing regulation of mobile-phone mast development in a devolved United Kingdom

William Walton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1985, the Thatcher Conservative Government granted the newly deregulated mobile-phone companies permitted development rights to erect telecommunications masts up to 15 in in height. This dilution of planning control led to a proliferation of insensitively sited mobile-phone masts across the United Kingdom, prompting large-scale public hostility. After the publication of the Stewart Report in 2000, which pointed to the possible risks to people's psychological health from antennae radiation emissions, the newly devolved planning administrations of the United Kingdom conducted reviews of these permitted development rights. The author examines these reviews and the decisions that emerged from them. It is argued that the differentiated approach to mobile phone mast control that has resulted represents an early and important departure from what was, arguably, a unified planning system within the United Kingdom.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-705
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning B-Planning and Design
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2002

Cite this

The changing regulation of mobile-phone mast development in a devolved United Kingdom. / Walton, William.

In: Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.2002, p. 687-705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79614c5fdb014aee8b1d1c7b70b4663f,
title = "The changing regulation of mobile-phone mast development in a devolved United Kingdom",
abstract = "In 1985, the Thatcher Conservative Government granted the newly deregulated mobile-phone companies permitted development rights to erect telecommunications masts up to 15 in in height. This dilution of planning control led to a proliferation of insensitively sited mobile-phone masts across the United Kingdom, prompting large-scale public hostility. After the publication of the Stewart Report in 2000, which pointed to the possible risks to people's psychological health from antennae radiation emissions, the newly devolved planning administrations of the United Kingdom conducted reviews of these permitted development rights. The author examines these reviews and the decisions that emerged from them. It is argued that the differentiated approach to mobile phone mast control that has resulted represents an early and important departure from what was, arguably, a unified planning system within the United Kingdom.",
author = "William Walton",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1068/b12849",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "687--705",
journal = "Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design",
issn = "0265-8135",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The changing regulation of mobile-phone mast development in a devolved United Kingdom

AU - Walton, William

PY - 2002/1

Y1 - 2002/1

N2 - In 1985, the Thatcher Conservative Government granted the newly deregulated mobile-phone companies permitted development rights to erect telecommunications masts up to 15 in in height. This dilution of planning control led to a proliferation of insensitively sited mobile-phone masts across the United Kingdom, prompting large-scale public hostility. After the publication of the Stewart Report in 2000, which pointed to the possible risks to people's psychological health from antennae radiation emissions, the newly devolved planning administrations of the United Kingdom conducted reviews of these permitted development rights. The author examines these reviews and the decisions that emerged from them. It is argued that the differentiated approach to mobile phone mast control that has resulted represents an early and important departure from what was, arguably, a unified planning system within the United Kingdom.

AB - In 1985, the Thatcher Conservative Government granted the newly deregulated mobile-phone companies permitted development rights to erect telecommunications masts up to 15 in in height. This dilution of planning control led to a proliferation of insensitively sited mobile-phone masts across the United Kingdom, prompting large-scale public hostility. After the publication of the Stewart Report in 2000, which pointed to the possible risks to people's psychological health from antennae radiation emissions, the newly devolved planning administrations of the United Kingdom conducted reviews of these permitted development rights. The author examines these reviews and the decisions that emerged from them. It is argued that the differentiated approach to mobile phone mast control that has resulted represents an early and important departure from what was, arguably, a unified planning system within the United Kingdom.

U2 - 10.1068/b12849

DO - 10.1068/b12849

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 687

EP - 705

JO - Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design

JF - Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design

SN - 0265-8135

IS - 5

ER -