The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-249
Number of pages20
JournalJuridical Review
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • diligence
  • floating charges
  • inhibitions
  • preferences
  • receivers
  • Scotland

Cite this

The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd. / Macpherson, Alisdair.

In: Juridical Review, No. 4, 12.2018, p. 230-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb0c93b36fb144b99e1023486981dd08,
title = "The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.",
abstract = "Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was {"}effectively executed diligence{"} that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.",
keywords = "diligence, floating charges, inhibitions, preferences, receivers, Scotland",
author = "Alisdair Macpherson",
note = "Available through Westlaw UK.",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
language = "English",
pages = "230--249",
journal = "Juridical Review",
issn = "0022-6785",
publisher = "W. Green & sons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Circle Squared? Floating Charges and Diligence After MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd.

AU - Macpherson, Alisdair

N1 - Available through Westlaw UK.

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.

AB - Discusses MacMillan v T Leith Developments Ltd (In Receivership and Liquidation) (IH) on whether an inhibition was "effectively executed diligence" that conferred priority over a floating charge holder. Considers remaining issues about the relationship of diligence, floating charges and insolvency.

KW - diligence

KW - floating charges

KW - inhibitions

KW - preferences

KW - receivers

KW - Scotland

M3 - Article

SP - 230

EP - 249

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

SN - 0022-6785

IS - 4

ER -