The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations

Adam Perry, Farrah Ahmed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The doctrine of legitimate expectations is a developing area of administrative law, and many issues remain outstanding. Promises, practices, and policies generate legitimate expectations, but what is special about them? Why do they and only they generate legitimate expectations? The lack of an obvious answer has led some commentators to claim that the doctrine is ultimately incoherent and should be disaggregated. In this paper, we challenge this claim by arguing, first, that promises, practices, and policies each comprise or make applicable a certain type of rule, and second, that having a legitimate expectation is a matter of such a rule binding a public body to act in some way. This rule-based account gives the doctrine of legitimate expectations both coherence and distinctiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-85
Number of pages25
JournalCambridge Law Journal
Volume73
Issue number01
Early online date7 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

doctrine
administrative law
coherence
lack

Keywords

  • legitimate expectations
  • rules
  • coherence
  • promises
  • practices
  • policies

Cite this

The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations. / Perry, Adam; Ahmed, Farrah .

In: Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 73, No. 01, 03.2014, p. 61-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perry, Adam ; Ahmed, Farrah . / The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations. In: Cambridge Law Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 73, No. 01. pp. 61-85.
@article{a5dd8348b1ae4c37afa03c142360a482,
title = "The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations",
abstract = "The doctrine of legitimate expectations is a developing area of administrative law, and many issues remain outstanding. Promises, practices, and policies generate legitimate expectations, but what is special about them? Why do they and only they generate legitimate expectations? The lack of an obvious answer has led some commentators to claim that the doctrine is ultimately incoherent and should be disaggregated. In this paper, we challenge this claim by arguing, first, that promises, practices, and policies each comprise or make applicable a certain type of rule, and second, that having a legitimate expectation is a matter of such a rule binding a public body to act in some way. This rule-based account gives the doctrine of legitimate expectations both coherence and distinctiveness.",
keywords = "legitimate expectations, rules, coherence, promises, practices, policies",
author = "Adam Perry and Farrah Ahmed",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S0008197314000026",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "61--85",
journal = "Cambridge Law Journal",
issn = "0008-1973",
publisher = "Stevens & Sons",
number = "01",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations

AU - Perry, Adam

AU - Ahmed, Farrah

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - The doctrine of legitimate expectations is a developing area of administrative law, and many issues remain outstanding. Promises, practices, and policies generate legitimate expectations, but what is special about them? Why do they and only they generate legitimate expectations? The lack of an obvious answer has led some commentators to claim that the doctrine is ultimately incoherent and should be disaggregated. In this paper, we challenge this claim by arguing, first, that promises, practices, and policies each comprise or make applicable a certain type of rule, and second, that having a legitimate expectation is a matter of such a rule binding a public body to act in some way. This rule-based account gives the doctrine of legitimate expectations both coherence and distinctiveness.

AB - The doctrine of legitimate expectations is a developing area of administrative law, and many issues remain outstanding. Promises, practices, and policies generate legitimate expectations, but what is special about them? Why do they and only they generate legitimate expectations? The lack of an obvious answer has led some commentators to claim that the doctrine is ultimately incoherent and should be disaggregated. In this paper, we challenge this claim by arguing, first, that promises, practices, and policies each comprise or make applicable a certain type of rule, and second, that having a legitimate expectation is a matter of such a rule binding a public body to act in some way. This rule-based account gives the doctrine of legitimate expectations both coherence and distinctiveness.

KW - legitimate expectations

KW - rules

KW - coherence

KW - promises

KW - practices

KW - policies

U2 - 10.1017/S0008197314000026

DO - 10.1017/S0008197314000026

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 61

EP - 85

JO - Cambridge Law Journal

JF - Cambridge Law Journal

SN - 0008-1973

IS - 01

ER -