The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein

Robert Christopher Plant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In The History of Sexuality, Foucault maintains that “Western man has become a confessing animal” (1990, 59), thus implying that “man” was not always such a creature. On a related point, Wittgenstein suggests that “man is a ceremonial animal” (1996, 67); here the suggestion is that human beings are, by their very nature, ritualistically inclined. In this paper I examine this crucial difference in emphasis, first by reconstructing Foucault's “genealogy” of confession, and subsequently by exploring relevant facets of Wittgenstein's later thinking. While there are significant correlations between Foucault and Wittgenstein, an important disparity emerges in relation to the question of the “natural.” By critically analyzing this, I show how Wittgenstein's minimal naturalism provides an important corrective to Foucault's more extravagant claims. By implication, we see why any radical relativist, historicist, and/or constructivist position becomes untenable on Wittgensteinian grounds, even though Wittgenstein himself is often read as promoting such views.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-559
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Religious Ethics
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Ludwig Wittgenstein
Animals
Naturalism
Relativist
Creatures
Ceremonial
Human Being
History of Sexuality
Genealogy
Constructivist

Keywords

  • Foucault
  • Wittgenstein
  • genealogy
  • confession
  • historicism
  • naturalism

Cite this

The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein. / Plant, Robert Christopher.

In: Journal of Religious Ethics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 12.2006, p. 533-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Plant, Robert Christopher. / The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein. In: Journal of Religious Ethics. 2006 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 533-559.
@article{db79a30c89e442f2847a2811bdef9144,
title = "The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein",
abstract = "In The History of Sexuality, Foucault maintains that “Western man has become a confessing animal” (1990, 59), thus implying that “man” was not always such a creature. On a related point, Wittgenstein suggests that “man is a ceremonial animal” (1996, 67); here the suggestion is that human beings are, by their very nature, ritualistically inclined. In this paper I examine this crucial difference in emphasis, first by reconstructing Foucault's “genealogy” of confession, and subsequently by exploring relevant facets of Wittgenstein's later thinking. While there are significant correlations between Foucault and Wittgenstein, an important disparity emerges in relation to the question of the “natural.” By critically analyzing this, I show how Wittgenstein's minimal naturalism provides an important corrective to Foucault's more extravagant claims. By implication, we see why any radical relativist, historicist, and/or constructivist position becomes untenable on Wittgensteinian grounds, even though Wittgenstein himself is often read as promoting such views.",
keywords = "Foucault, Wittgenstein, genealogy, confession, historicism, naturalism",
author = "Plant, {Robert Christopher}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00284.x",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "533--559",
journal = "Journal of Religious Ethics",
issn = "0384-9694",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein

AU - Plant, Robert Christopher

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - In The History of Sexuality, Foucault maintains that “Western man has become a confessing animal” (1990, 59), thus implying that “man” was not always such a creature. On a related point, Wittgenstein suggests that “man is a ceremonial animal” (1996, 67); here the suggestion is that human beings are, by their very nature, ritualistically inclined. In this paper I examine this crucial difference in emphasis, first by reconstructing Foucault's “genealogy” of confession, and subsequently by exploring relevant facets of Wittgenstein's later thinking. While there are significant correlations between Foucault and Wittgenstein, an important disparity emerges in relation to the question of the “natural.” By critically analyzing this, I show how Wittgenstein's minimal naturalism provides an important corrective to Foucault's more extravagant claims. By implication, we see why any radical relativist, historicist, and/or constructivist position becomes untenable on Wittgensteinian grounds, even though Wittgenstein himself is often read as promoting such views.

AB - In The History of Sexuality, Foucault maintains that “Western man has become a confessing animal” (1990, 59), thus implying that “man” was not always such a creature. On a related point, Wittgenstein suggests that “man is a ceremonial animal” (1996, 67); here the suggestion is that human beings are, by their very nature, ritualistically inclined. In this paper I examine this crucial difference in emphasis, first by reconstructing Foucault's “genealogy” of confession, and subsequently by exploring relevant facets of Wittgenstein's later thinking. While there are significant correlations between Foucault and Wittgenstein, an important disparity emerges in relation to the question of the “natural.” By critically analyzing this, I show how Wittgenstein's minimal naturalism provides an important corrective to Foucault's more extravagant claims. By implication, we see why any radical relativist, historicist, and/or constructivist position becomes untenable on Wittgensteinian grounds, even though Wittgenstein himself is often read as promoting such views.

KW - Foucault

KW - Wittgenstein

KW - genealogy

KW - confession

KW - historicism

KW - naturalism

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00284.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00284.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 533

EP - 559

JO - Journal of Religious Ethics

JF - Journal of Religious Ethics

SN - 0384-9694

IS - 4

ER -