The Contested Constitution: An Analysis of the Competing Models of British Constitutionalism

Robert Brett Taylor

The Contested Constitution: An Analysis of the Competing Models of British Constitutionalism

Robert Brett Taylor

Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

155 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Examines the debate over the meaning of British constitutionalism, and analyses key features of its three competing models. Reviews the elements of legal constitutionalism, common law constitutionalism and political constitutionalism, and suggests why an appropriate view of such constitutionalism requires a combination of elements from all three theories.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	500-522
Number of pages	23
Journal	Public Law
Volume	July
Publication status	Published - 31 Jul 2018

Keywords

common law
constitutional law
Jurisprudence
politics and law

Access to Document

Accepted Manuscript
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Law following peer review. The definitive published version [R.B. Taylor, ‘The Contested Constitution: An Analysis of the Competing Models of British Constitutionalism’ [2018] P.L. 500] is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .
Accepted author manuscript, 616 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IBE6315B0698D11E8BC8BED74AF6BBCBC/View/FullText.htmlLicence: Unspecified

Robert Taylor
- School of Law, Law - Senior Lecturer
Person: Academic

Cite this

@article{66455e560d7440249de65becf383efcc,

title = "The Contested Constitution: An Analysis of the Competing Models of British Constitutionalism",

abstract = "Examines the debate over the meaning of British constitutionalism, and analyses key features of its three competing models. Reviews the elements of legal constitutionalism, common law constitutionalism and political constitutionalism, and suggests why an appropriate view of such constitutionalism requires a combination of elements from all three theories.",

keywords = "common law, constitutional law, Jurisprudence, politics and law",

author = "Taylor, {Robert Brett}",

note = "Available on Westlaw UK. I am grateful to the anonymous reviewer and to Adelyn Wilson and Mike Radford for their comments on an earlier draft.",

year = "2018",

month = jul,

day = "31",

language = "English",

volume = "July",

pages = "500--522",

journal = "Public Law",

issn = "0033-3565",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Contested Constitution

T2 - An Analysis of the Competing Models of British Constitutionalism

AU - Taylor, Robert Brett

N1 - Available on Westlaw UK. I am grateful to the anonymous reviewer and to Adelyn Wilson and Mike Radford for their comments on an earlier draft.

PY - 2018/7/31

Y1 - 2018/7/31

N2 - Examines the debate over the meaning of British constitutionalism, and analyses key features of its three competing models. Reviews the elements of legal constitutionalism, common law constitutionalism and political constitutionalism, and suggests why an appropriate view of such constitutionalism requires a combination of elements from all three theories.

AB - Examines the debate over the meaning of British constitutionalism, and analyses key features of its three competing models. Reviews the elements of legal constitutionalism, common law constitutionalism and political constitutionalism, and suggests why an appropriate view of such constitutionalism requires a combination of elements from all three theories.

KW - common law

KW - constitutional law

KW - Jurisprudence

KW - politics and law

M3 - Article

VL - July

SP - 500

EP - 522

JO - Public Law

JF - Public Law

SN - 0033-3565

ER -

The Contested Constitution: An Analysis of the Competing Models of British Constitutionalism

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Profiles

Robert Taylor

Cite this