The cost of microwave endometrial ablation under different anaesthetic and clinical settings

J Seymour, Sarah Wallage, Wendy Jane Graham, David Parkin, K. Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To compare the costs of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic and general anaesthetic in an operating theatre and to estimate the cost of performing treatment under local anaesthetic in a dedicated clinic setting.

Design The costing study was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing the acceptability of microwave endometrial ablation using local versus general anaesthetic in a theatre setting.

Setting Department of Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland.

Sample One hundred and twenty-seven women undergoing microwave endometrial ablation who had been randomly allocated to general or local anaesthetic.

Methods Health and non-health service resource use was recorded prospectively. Data on resource use were combined with unit costs estimated using standardised methods to determine the cost per patient for microwave endometrial ablation under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. A model was developed to estimate the health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic in a clinic setting.

Main outcome measures Health and non-health service costs.

Results There was little difference in cost when treatments were performed under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. The median health and non-health cost of microwave endometrial ablation was pound440 and pound120, respectively, under general anaesthetic and pound428 and pound125 per women under local anaesthetic. The health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation using local anaesthetic in a clinic setting was estimated to be pound432 per treatment; however, this varied from pound389 to pound491 in the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion There are minimal cost savings to the patient or health service from using local rather than general anaesthetic for microwave endometrial ablation in a theatre setting. Cost modelling suggests that in a clinic setting microwave endometrial ablation has a similar cost to theatre based treatment once re-admissions for treatment under general anaesthetic are considered. Sensitivity analysis indicated that these findings were sensitive to assumptions in the model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)922-926
Number of pages4
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume110
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
  • ECONOMIC-EVALUATION
  • GENERAL-ANESTHESIA
  • HYSTERECTOMY
  • MENORRHAGIA
  • RESECTION
  • SURGERY

Cite this

The cost of microwave endometrial ablation under different anaesthetic and clinical settings. / Seymour, J; Wallage, Sarah; Graham, Wendy Jane; Parkin, David; Cooper, K.

In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 110, No. 10, 2003, p. 922-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seymour, J ; Wallage, Sarah ; Graham, Wendy Jane ; Parkin, David ; Cooper, K. / The cost of microwave endometrial ablation under different anaesthetic and clinical settings. In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003 ; Vol. 110, No. 10. pp. 922-926.
@article{249d20af16444c3ea2273c3c892a7bf5,
title = "The cost of microwave endometrial ablation under different anaesthetic and clinical settings",
abstract = "Objective To compare the costs of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic and general anaesthetic in an operating theatre and to estimate the cost of performing treatment under local anaesthetic in a dedicated clinic setting.Design The costing study was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing the acceptability of microwave endometrial ablation using local versus general anaesthetic in a theatre setting.Setting Department of Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland.Sample One hundred and twenty-seven women undergoing microwave endometrial ablation who had been randomly allocated to general or local anaesthetic.Methods Health and non-health service resource use was recorded prospectively. Data on resource use were combined with unit costs estimated using standardised methods to determine the cost per patient for microwave endometrial ablation under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. A model was developed to estimate the health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic in a clinic setting.Main outcome measures Health and non-health service costs.Results There was little difference in cost when treatments were performed under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. The median health and non-health cost of microwave endometrial ablation was pound440 and pound120, respectively, under general anaesthetic and pound428 and pound125 per women under local anaesthetic. The health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation using local anaesthetic in a clinic setting was estimated to be pound432 per treatment; however, this varied from pound389 to pound491 in the sensitivity analysis.Conclusion There are minimal cost savings to the patient or health service from using local rather than general anaesthetic for microwave endometrial ablation in a theatre setting. Cost modelling suggests that in a clinic setting microwave endometrial ablation has a similar cost to theatre based treatment once re-admissions for treatment under general anaesthetic are considered. Sensitivity analysis indicated that these findings were sensitive to assumptions in the model.",
keywords = "QUALITY-OF-LIFE, RANDOMIZED-TRIAL, ECONOMIC-EVALUATION, GENERAL-ANESTHESIA, HYSTERECTOMY, MENORRHAGIA, RESECTION, SURGERY",
author = "J Seymour and Sarah Wallage and Graham, {Wendy Jane} and David Parkin and K. Cooper",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02179.x",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "922--926",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cost of microwave endometrial ablation under different anaesthetic and clinical settings

AU - Seymour, J

AU - Wallage, Sarah

AU - Graham, Wendy Jane

AU - Parkin, David

AU - Cooper, K.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Objective To compare the costs of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic and general anaesthetic in an operating theatre and to estimate the cost of performing treatment under local anaesthetic in a dedicated clinic setting.Design The costing study was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing the acceptability of microwave endometrial ablation using local versus general anaesthetic in a theatre setting.Setting Department of Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland.Sample One hundred and twenty-seven women undergoing microwave endometrial ablation who had been randomly allocated to general or local anaesthetic.Methods Health and non-health service resource use was recorded prospectively. Data on resource use were combined with unit costs estimated using standardised methods to determine the cost per patient for microwave endometrial ablation under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. A model was developed to estimate the health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic in a clinic setting.Main outcome measures Health and non-health service costs.Results There was little difference in cost when treatments were performed under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. The median health and non-health cost of microwave endometrial ablation was pound440 and pound120, respectively, under general anaesthetic and pound428 and pound125 per women under local anaesthetic. The health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation using local anaesthetic in a clinic setting was estimated to be pound432 per treatment; however, this varied from pound389 to pound491 in the sensitivity analysis.Conclusion There are minimal cost savings to the patient or health service from using local rather than general anaesthetic for microwave endometrial ablation in a theatre setting. Cost modelling suggests that in a clinic setting microwave endometrial ablation has a similar cost to theatre based treatment once re-admissions for treatment under general anaesthetic are considered. Sensitivity analysis indicated that these findings were sensitive to assumptions in the model.

AB - Objective To compare the costs of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic and general anaesthetic in an operating theatre and to estimate the cost of performing treatment under local anaesthetic in a dedicated clinic setting.Design The costing study was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing the acceptability of microwave endometrial ablation using local versus general anaesthetic in a theatre setting.Setting Department of Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland.Sample One hundred and twenty-seven women undergoing microwave endometrial ablation who had been randomly allocated to general or local anaesthetic.Methods Health and non-health service resource use was recorded prospectively. Data on resource use were combined with unit costs estimated using standardised methods to determine the cost per patient for microwave endometrial ablation under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. A model was developed to estimate the health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation under local anaesthetic in a clinic setting.Main outcome measures Health and non-health service costs.Results There was little difference in cost when treatments were performed under local or general anaesthetic in theatre. The median health and non-health cost of microwave endometrial ablation was pound440 and pound120, respectively, under general anaesthetic and pound428 and pound125 per women under local anaesthetic. The health service cost of microwave endometrial ablation using local anaesthetic in a clinic setting was estimated to be pound432 per treatment; however, this varied from pound389 to pound491 in the sensitivity analysis.Conclusion There are minimal cost savings to the patient or health service from using local rather than general anaesthetic for microwave endometrial ablation in a theatre setting. Cost modelling suggests that in a clinic setting microwave endometrial ablation has a similar cost to theatre based treatment once re-admissions for treatment under general anaesthetic are considered. Sensitivity analysis indicated that these findings were sensitive to assumptions in the model.

KW - QUALITY-OF-LIFE

KW - RANDOMIZED-TRIAL

KW - ECONOMIC-EVALUATION

KW - GENERAL-ANESTHESIA

KW - HYSTERECTOMY

KW - MENORRHAGIA

KW - RESECTION

KW - SURGERY

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02179.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02179.x

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 922

EP - 926

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 10

ER -