The DAMASK trial protocol: a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee

Stephen D Brealey (Corresponding Author), Christine Atwell, Stirling Bryan, Simon Coulton, Helen Cox, Ben Cross, Fiona Fylan, Andrew Garratt, Fiona J Gilbert, Maureen G C Gillan, Maggie Hendry, Kerenza Hood, Helen Houston, David King, Veronica Morton, Jo Orchard, Michael Robling, Ian T Russell, David Torgerson, Valerie WadsworthClare Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Though new technologies like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be accurate, they often diffuse into practice before thorough assessment of their value in diagnosis and management, and of their effects on patient outcome and costs. MRI of the knee is a common investigation despite concern that it is not always appropriate. There is wide variation in general practitioners (GPs) access to, and use of MRI, and in the associated costs. The objective of this study was to resolve uncertainty whether GPs should refer patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee for MRI or to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care.
Methods/Design: The design consisted of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial with two parallel groups and concomitant economic evaluation. Patients presenting in general practice with suspected internal derangement of the knee and for whom their GP was considering referral to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care were eligible for inclusion. Within practices, GPs or practice nurses randomised eligible and consenting participants to the local radiology department for an MRI examination, or for consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. To ensure that the waiting time from GP consultation to orthopaedic appointment was similar for both trial arms, GPs made a provisional referral to orthopaedics when requesting the MRI examination. Thus we evaluated the more appropriate sequence of events independent of variations in waiting times. Follow up of participants was by postal questionnaires at six, twelve and 24 months after randomisation. This was to ensure that the evaluation covered all events up to and including arthroscopy.
Discussion: The DAMASK trial should make a major contribution to the development of evidence-based partnerships between primary and secondary care professionals and inform the debate when MRI should enter the diagnostic pathway.

Original languageEnglish
Article number133
Number of pages9
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2006

Keywords

  • general practitioners
  • primary care
  • lumbar spine
  • arthroscopy
  • management
  • quality
  • SF-36

Cite this

The DAMASK trial protocol : a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee. / Brealey, Stephen D (Corresponding Author); Atwell, Christine; Bryan, Stirling; Coulton, Simon; Cox, Helen; Cross, Ben; Fylan, Fiona; Garratt, Andrew; Gilbert, Fiona J; Gillan, Maureen G C; Hendry, Maggie; Hood, Kerenza; Houston, Helen; King, David; Morton, Veronica; Orchard, Jo; Robling, Michael; T Russell, Ian; Torgerson, David; Wadsworth, Valerie; Wilkinson, Clare.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 6, 133, 13.10.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brealey, SD, Atwell, C, Bryan, S, Coulton, S, Cox, H, Cross, B, Fylan, F, Garratt, A, Gilbert, FJ, Gillan, MGC, Hendry, M, Hood, K, Houston, H, King, D, Morton, V, Orchard, J, Robling, M, T Russell, I, Torgerson, D, Wadsworth, V & Wilkinson, C 2006, 'The DAMASK trial protocol: a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee', BMC Health Services Research, vol. 6, 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-133
Brealey, Stephen D ; Atwell, Christine ; Bryan, Stirling ; Coulton, Simon ; Cox, Helen ; Cross, Ben ; Fylan, Fiona ; Garratt, Andrew ; Gilbert, Fiona J ; Gillan, Maureen G C ; Hendry, Maggie ; Hood, Kerenza ; Houston, Helen ; King, David ; Morton, Veronica ; Orchard, Jo ; Robling, Michael ; T Russell, Ian ; Torgerson, David ; Wadsworth, Valerie ; Wilkinson, Clare. / The DAMASK trial protocol : a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2006 ; Vol. 6.
@article{09327a1a092649c988ecaaedf9a5b37e,
title = "The DAMASK trial protocol: a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee",
abstract = "Background: Though new technologies like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be accurate, they often diffuse into practice before thorough assessment of their value in diagnosis and management, and of their effects on patient outcome and costs. MRI of the knee is a common investigation despite concern that it is not always appropriate. There is wide variation in general practitioners (GPs) access to, and use of MRI, and in the associated costs. The objective of this study was to resolve uncertainty whether GPs should refer patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee for MRI or to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care.Methods/Design: The design consisted of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial with two parallel groups and concomitant economic evaluation. Patients presenting in general practice with suspected internal derangement of the knee and for whom their GP was considering referral to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care were eligible for inclusion. Within practices, GPs or practice nurses randomised eligible and consenting participants to the local radiology department for an MRI examination, or for consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. To ensure that the waiting time from GP consultation to orthopaedic appointment was similar for both trial arms, GPs made a provisional referral to orthopaedics when requesting the MRI examination. Thus we evaluated the more appropriate sequence of events independent of variations in waiting times. Follow up of participants was by postal questionnaires at six, twelve and 24 months after randomisation. This was to ensure that the evaluation covered all events up to and including arthroscopy.Discussion: The DAMASK trial should make a major contribution to the development of evidence-based partnerships between primary and secondary care professionals and inform the debate when MRI should enter the diagnostic pathway.",
keywords = "general practitioners, primary care , lumbar spine, arthroscopy, management, quality, SF-36",
author = "Brealey, {Stephen D} and Christine Atwell and Stirling Bryan and Simon Coulton and Helen Cox and Ben Cross and Fiona Fylan and Andrew Garratt and Gilbert, {Fiona J} and Gillan, {Maureen G C} and Maggie Hendry and Kerenza Hood and Helen Houston and David King and Veronica Morton and Jo Orchard and Michael Robling and {T Russell}, Ian and David Torgerson and Valerie Wadsworth and Clare Wilkinson",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-6-133",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The DAMASK trial protocol

T2 - a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee

AU - Brealey, Stephen D

AU - Atwell, Christine

AU - Bryan, Stirling

AU - Coulton, Simon

AU - Cox, Helen

AU - Cross, Ben

AU - Fylan, Fiona

AU - Garratt, Andrew

AU - Gilbert, Fiona J

AU - Gillan, Maureen G C

AU - Hendry, Maggie

AU - Hood, Kerenza

AU - Houston, Helen

AU - King, David

AU - Morton, Veronica

AU - Orchard, Jo

AU - Robling, Michael

AU - T Russell, Ian

AU - Torgerson, David

AU - Wadsworth, Valerie

AU - Wilkinson, Clare

PY - 2006/10/13

Y1 - 2006/10/13

N2 - Background: Though new technologies like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be accurate, they often diffuse into practice before thorough assessment of their value in diagnosis and management, and of their effects on patient outcome and costs. MRI of the knee is a common investigation despite concern that it is not always appropriate. There is wide variation in general practitioners (GPs) access to, and use of MRI, and in the associated costs. The objective of this study was to resolve uncertainty whether GPs should refer patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee for MRI or to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care.Methods/Design: The design consisted of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial with two parallel groups and concomitant economic evaluation. Patients presenting in general practice with suspected internal derangement of the knee and for whom their GP was considering referral to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care were eligible for inclusion. Within practices, GPs or practice nurses randomised eligible and consenting participants to the local radiology department for an MRI examination, or for consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. To ensure that the waiting time from GP consultation to orthopaedic appointment was similar for both trial arms, GPs made a provisional referral to orthopaedics when requesting the MRI examination. Thus we evaluated the more appropriate sequence of events independent of variations in waiting times. Follow up of participants was by postal questionnaires at six, twelve and 24 months after randomisation. This was to ensure that the evaluation covered all events up to and including arthroscopy.Discussion: The DAMASK trial should make a major contribution to the development of evidence-based partnerships between primary and secondary care professionals and inform the debate when MRI should enter the diagnostic pathway.

AB - Background: Though new technologies like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be accurate, they often diffuse into practice before thorough assessment of their value in diagnosis and management, and of their effects on patient outcome and costs. MRI of the knee is a common investigation despite concern that it is not always appropriate. There is wide variation in general practitioners (GPs) access to, and use of MRI, and in the associated costs. The objective of this study was to resolve uncertainty whether GPs should refer patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee for MRI or to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care.Methods/Design: The design consisted of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial with two parallel groups and concomitant economic evaluation. Patients presenting in general practice with suspected internal derangement of the knee and for whom their GP was considering referral to an orthopaedic specialist in secondary care were eligible for inclusion. Within practices, GPs or practice nurses randomised eligible and consenting participants to the local radiology department for an MRI examination, or for consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. To ensure that the waiting time from GP consultation to orthopaedic appointment was similar for both trial arms, GPs made a provisional referral to orthopaedics when requesting the MRI examination. Thus we evaluated the more appropriate sequence of events independent of variations in waiting times. Follow up of participants was by postal questionnaires at six, twelve and 24 months after randomisation. This was to ensure that the evaluation covered all events up to and including arthroscopy.Discussion: The DAMASK trial should make a major contribution to the development of evidence-based partnerships between primary and secondary care professionals and inform the debate when MRI should enter the diagnostic pathway.

KW - general practitioners

KW - primary care

KW - lumbar spine

KW - arthroscopy

KW - management

KW - quality

KW - SF-36

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-6-133

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-6-133

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

M1 - 133

ER -