The Debate About the Justification of Constitutional Review: Six Theses

Tamas Gyorfi^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The paper puts forward six theses about the nature, the state and the relevance of the debate on constitutional review.

@article{924f7ab39c3242ddbc8914340618d9a3,

title = "The Debate About the Justification of Constitutional Review: Six Theses",

abstract = "The paper puts forward six theses about the nature, the state and the relevance of the debate on constitutional review.",

keywords = "judicial review, constitutional review, human rights",

author = "Tamas Gyorfi",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

day = "15",

doi = "10.2139/ssrn.2986016",

language = "English",

journal = "SSRN Electronic Journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Debate About the Justification of Constitutional Review

T2 - Six Theses

AU - Gyorfi, Tamas

PY - 2017/6/15

Y1 - 2017/6/15

N2 - The paper puts forward six theses about the nature, the state and the relevance of the debate on constitutional review.

AB - The paper puts forward six theses about the nature, the state and the relevance of the debate on constitutional review.

KW - judicial review

KW - constitutional review

KW - human rights

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.2986016

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.2986016

M3 - Article

JO - SSRN Electronic Journal

JF - SSRN Electronic Journal

ER -