The development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the impact of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia

a questionnaire study

J Lockhart, NM Gray, ME Cruickshank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a questionnaire to assess the burden of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in women. DESIGN: A questionnaire development study. SETTING: Vulval Disorders Clinic serving a regional population. SAMPLE: Fifty-eight women with a histological diagnosis of VIN registered with the Vulval Disorders Clinic. METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review, consultation with specialist clinicians and pretesting to assess the burden experienced by women. The questionnaire was assessed for validity and reliability against existing questionnaires used in related disease areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman correlations were calculated between items in the VIN questionnaire with the scores of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Sabbatsberg Sexual Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) and the Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM) to assess the new questionnaire's validity. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was calculated using quadratic weighted kappa. RESULTS: The VIN questionnaire had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.89). Test-retest reliability was assessed, with most questions showing a quadratic weighted kappa value of 0.5 or above. Most questions showed a stronger correlation with the corrected total VIN score than with HADS anxiety and depression subscales and the SSRS, indicating discriminant validity. Most questions correlated significantly with the DLQI and POSM scores, indicating convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of the VIN questionnaire demonstrated that it is a valid and reliable measure of the burden of disease for women. The questionnaire could be used to compare new and existing treatments for VIN or to assess or monitor the impact of care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1133-1143
Number of pages11
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume120
Issue number9
Early online date10 Apr 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Reproducibility of Results
Anxiety
Depression
Dermatology
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Referral and Consultation
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • questionnaire
  • vulva disorders
  • vulval intraepithelial neoplasia

Cite this

The development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the impact of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia : a questionnaire study. / Lockhart, J; Gray, NM; Cruickshank, ME.

In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 120, No. 9, 08.2013, p. 1133-1143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7a765bd624d43d6aa5fe7323aad66f3,
title = "The development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the impact of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia: a questionnaire study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a questionnaire to assess the burden of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in women. DESIGN: A questionnaire development study. SETTING: Vulval Disorders Clinic serving a regional population. SAMPLE: Fifty-eight women with a histological diagnosis of VIN registered with the Vulval Disorders Clinic. METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review, consultation with specialist clinicians and pretesting to assess the burden experienced by women. The questionnaire was assessed for validity and reliability against existing questionnaires used in related disease areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman correlations were calculated between items in the VIN questionnaire with the scores of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Sabbatsberg Sexual Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) and the Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM) to assess the new questionnaire's validity. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was calculated using quadratic weighted kappa. RESULTS: The VIN questionnaire had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.89). Test-retest reliability was assessed, with most questions showing a quadratic weighted kappa value of 0.5 or above. Most questions showed a stronger correlation with the corrected total VIN score than with HADS anxiety and depression subscales and the SSRS, indicating discriminant validity. Most questions correlated significantly with the DLQI and POSM scores, indicating convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of the VIN questionnaire demonstrated that it is a valid and reliable measure of the burden of disease for women. The questionnaire could be used to compare new and existing treatments for VIN or to assess or monitor the impact of care.",
keywords = "questionnaire, vulva disorders, vulval intraepithelial neoplasia",
author = "J Lockhart and NM Gray and ME Cruickshank",
note = "{\circledC} 2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology {\circledC} 2013 RCOG.",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.12229",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "1133--1143",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess the impact of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia

T2 - a questionnaire study

AU - Lockhart, J

AU - Gray, NM

AU - Cruickshank, ME

N1 - © 2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2013 RCOG.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a questionnaire to assess the burden of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in women. DESIGN: A questionnaire development study. SETTING: Vulval Disorders Clinic serving a regional population. SAMPLE: Fifty-eight women with a histological diagnosis of VIN registered with the Vulval Disorders Clinic. METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review, consultation with specialist clinicians and pretesting to assess the burden experienced by women. The questionnaire was assessed for validity and reliability against existing questionnaires used in related disease areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman correlations were calculated between items in the VIN questionnaire with the scores of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Sabbatsberg Sexual Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) and the Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM) to assess the new questionnaire's validity. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was calculated using quadratic weighted kappa. RESULTS: The VIN questionnaire had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.89). Test-retest reliability was assessed, with most questions showing a quadratic weighted kappa value of 0.5 or above. Most questions showed a stronger correlation with the corrected total VIN score than with HADS anxiety and depression subscales and the SSRS, indicating discriminant validity. Most questions correlated significantly with the DLQI and POSM scores, indicating convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of the VIN questionnaire demonstrated that it is a valid and reliable measure of the burden of disease for women. The questionnaire could be used to compare new and existing treatments for VIN or to assess or monitor the impact of care.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a questionnaire to assess the burden of vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in women. DESIGN: A questionnaire development study. SETTING: Vulval Disorders Clinic serving a regional population. SAMPLE: Fifty-eight women with a histological diagnosis of VIN registered with the Vulval Disorders Clinic. METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review, consultation with specialist clinicians and pretesting to assess the burden experienced by women. The questionnaire was assessed for validity and reliability against existing questionnaires used in related disease areas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman correlations were calculated between items in the VIN questionnaire with the scores of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Sabbatsberg Sexual Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) and the Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM) to assess the new questionnaire's validity. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was calculated using quadratic weighted kappa. RESULTS: The VIN questionnaire had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.89). Test-retest reliability was assessed, with most questions showing a quadratic weighted kappa value of 0.5 or above. Most questions showed a stronger correlation with the corrected total VIN score than with HADS anxiety and depression subscales and the SSRS, indicating discriminant validity. Most questions correlated significantly with the DLQI and POSM scores, indicating convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of the VIN questionnaire demonstrated that it is a valid and reliable measure of the burden of disease for women. The questionnaire could be used to compare new and existing treatments for VIN or to assess or monitor the impact of care.

KW - questionnaire

KW - vulva disorders

KW - vulval intraepithelial neoplasia

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.12229

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.12229

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 1133

EP - 1143

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 9

ER -