The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women

Helen Cheyne, Dawn Dowding, Vanora Hundley, Lorna Aucott, Maggie Styles, Jill Mollison, Ian Greer, Catherine Niven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: to describe the development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active tabour in primiparous women.

Design: qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A literature review was first conducted to identify the key cues for inclusion in the algorithm. Focus groups of midwives were then conducted to assess content validity, finally a vignette study assessed the inter-rater reliability of the algorithm.

Setting: midwives from two study sites were invited to participate. Data were collected during 2002 and 2003.

Participants: midwives from the first site took part in the focus groups (n = 13), completed vignettes (n = 19), or both. Midwives from the second site then completed vignettes (n = 17). Findings: an algorithm, developed from the key informational cues reported in the literature, was validated in relation to content validity by the findings from the focus groups. Inter-rater reliability was tested using vignettes of admission case histories and was found to be moderate in the first test (K = 0.45). However, after modifying the algorithm the kappa score was 0.86, indicating a high level of agreement.

Key conclusions: diagnosis of tabour may be straightforward on paper but is frequently problematic in practice. This may be because the diagnosis of tabour is made in a high pressured environment where conflicting pressures of workload, limited resources and emotional pressures add to the complexity of the judgement.

Implications for practice: we offer a valid and reliable decision-support toot as an aid for diagnosis of tabour. The evaluation of the implementation of this tool is under way and will determine whether it is effective in reducing unnecessary admissions and improving clinical outcomes for women. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-213
Number of pages15
JournalMidwifery
Volume24
Issue number2
Early online date2 Mar 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Great Britain
  • Health Services Research
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Labor Onset
  • Midwifery
  • Nurse's Role
  • Nursing Diagnosis
  • Nursing Evaluation Research
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Pregnancy
  • Psychometrics

Cite this

Cheyne, H., Dowding, D., Hundley, V., Aucott, L., Styles, M., Mollison, J., ... Niven, C. (2008). The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women. Midwifery, 24(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.005

The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women. / Cheyne, Helen; Dowding, Dawn; Hundley, Vanora; Aucott, Lorna; Styles, Maggie; Mollison, Jill; Greer, Ian; Niven, Catherine.

In: Midwifery, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 199-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheyne, H, Dowding, D, Hundley, V, Aucott, L, Styles, M, Mollison, J, Greer, I & Niven, C 2008, 'The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women', Midwifery, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.005
Cheyne, Helen ; Dowding, Dawn ; Hundley, Vanora ; Aucott, Lorna ; Styles, Maggie ; Mollison, Jill ; Greer, Ian ; Niven, Catherine. / The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women. In: Midwifery. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 199-213.
@article{acbbd8c76462423190b87fad31a59769,
title = "The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women",
abstract = "Objectives: to describe the development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active tabour in primiparous women.Design: qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A literature review was first conducted to identify the key cues for inclusion in the algorithm. Focus groups of midwives were then conducted to assess content validity, finally a vignette study assessed the inter-rater reliability of the algorithm.Setting: midwives from two study sites were invited to participate. Data were collected during 2002 and 2003.Participants: midwives from the first site took part in the focus groups (n = 13), completed vignettes (n = 19), or both. Midwives from the second site then completed vignettes (n = 17). Findings: an algorithm, developed from the key informational cues reported in the literature, was validated in relation to content validity by the findings from the focus groups. Inter-rater reliability was tested using vignettes of admission case histories and was found to be moderate in the first test (K = 0.45). However, after modifying the algorithm the kappa score was 0.86, indicating a high level of agreement.Key conclusions: diagnosis of tabour may be straightforward on paper but is frequently problematic in practice. This may be because the diagnosis of tabour is made in a high pressured environment where conflicting pressures of workload, limited resources and emotional pressures add to the complexity of the judgement.Implications for practice: we offer a valid and reliable decision-support toot as an aid for diagnosis of tabour. The evaluation of the implementation of this tool is under way and will determine whether it is effective in reducing unnecessary admissions and improving clinical outcomes for women. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.",
keywords = "Adult, Algorithms, Female, Focus Groups, Great Britain, Health Services Research, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor Onset, Midwifery, Nurse's Role, Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Evaluation Research, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Pregnancy, Psychometrics",
author = "Helen Cheyne and Dawn Dowding and Vanora Hundley and Lorna Aucott and Maggie Styles and Jill Mollison and Ian Greer and Catherine Niven",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.005",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "199--213",
journal = "Midwifery",
issn = "0266-6138",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women

AU - Cheyne, Helen

AU - Dowding, Dawn

AU - Hundley, Vanora

AU - Aucott, Lorna

AU - Styles, Maggie

AU - Mollison, Jill

AU - Greer, Ian

AU - Niven, Catherine

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Objectives: to describe the development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active tabour in primiparous women.Design: qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A literature review was first conducted to identify the key cues for inclusion in the algorithm. Focus groups of midwives were then conducted to assess content validity, finally a vignette study assessed the inter-rater reliability of the algorithm.Setting: midwives from two study sites were invited to participate. Data were collected during 2002 and 2003.Participants: midwives from the first site took part in the focus groups (n = 13), completed vignettes (n = 19), or both. Midwives from the second site then completed vignettes (n = 17). Findings: an algorithm, developed from the key informational cues reported in the literature, was validated in relation to content validity by the findings from the focus groups. Inter-rater reliability was tested using vignettes of admission case histories and was found to be moderate in the first test (K = 0.45). However, after modifying the algorithm the kappa score was 0.86, indicating a high level of agreement.Key conclusions: diagnosis of tabour may be straightforward on paper but is frequently problematic in practice. This may be because the diagnosis of tabour is made in a high pressured environment where conflicting pressures of workload, limited resources and emotional pressures add to the complexity of the judgement.Implications for practice: we offer a valid and reliable decision-support toot as an aid for diagnosis of tabour. The evaluation of the implementation of this tool is under way and will determine whether it is effective in reducing unnecessary admissions and improving clinical outcomes for women. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.

AB - Objectives: to describe the development and testing of an algorithm for diagnosis of active tabour in primiparous women.Design: qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A literature review was first conducted to identify the key cues for inclusion in the algorithm. Focus groups of midwives were then conducted to assess content validity, finally a vignette study assessed the inter-rater reliability of the algorithm.Setting: midwives from two study sites were invited to participate. Data were collected during 2002 and 2003.Participants: midwives from the first site took part in the focus groups (n = 13), completed vignettes (n = 19), or both. Midwives from the second site then completed vignettes (n = 17). Findings: an algorithm, developed from the key informational cues reported in the literature, was validated in relation to content validity by the findings from the focus groups. Inter-rater reliability was tested using vignettes of admission case histories and was found to be moderate in the first test (K = 0.45). However, after modifying the algorithm the kappa score was 0.86, indicating a high level of agreement.Key conclusions: diagnosis of tabour may be straightforward on paper but is frequently problematic in practice. This may be because the diagnosis of tabour is made in a high pressured environment where conflicting pressures of workload, limited resources and emotional pressures add to the complexity of the judgement.Implications for practice: we offer a valid and reliable decision-support toot as an aid for diagnosis of tabour. The evaluation of the implementation of this tool is under way and will determine whether it is effective in reducing unnecessary admissions and improving clinical outcomes for women. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.

KW - Adult

KW - Algorithms

KW - Female

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Great Britain

KW - Health Services Research

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Labor Onset

KW - Midwifery

KW - Nurse's Role

KW - Nursing Diagnosis

KW - Nursing Evaluation Research

KW - Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Psychometrics

U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.005

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 199

EP - 213

JO - Midwifery

JF - Midwifery

SN - 0266-6138

IS - 2

ER -