Abstract
Objectives
Current serological methods cannot distinguish active from past infection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. The aim of this study was to develop an IgG avidity Western blot and assess its potential to differentiate patients with early and late Lyme borreliosis (LB) i.e. active disease, from those infected in the past.
Methods
An IgG avidity Western blot was developed. Penalized linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) was employed to compare the Western blot/avidity Western blot profiles of an evaluation panel consisting of 75 sera from patients with early (n = 26) and late (n = 24) LB and past infection (n = 25). The PLDA models produced were used to predict infection stage for 20 well characterised sera from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Lyme disease serum repository and 112 routine seropositive sera (disease stage unknown), to validate and assess the usefulness of the avidity Western blot/avidity Western blot and PLDA approach.
Results
PLDA correctly classified 40/51 (78%) of patients when early LB and past infection groups in the evaluation panel were compared. Likewise, when late LB and past infection groups were compared, 34/49 (69%) were correct. The resultant PLDA models correctly predicted infection stage for 18/20 (90%) of the CDC sera, validating the use of the avidity Western blot/avidity Western blot and PLDA approach. When tested with the routine sera, 21/29 (72%) tested with the early LB vs. past infection model were correct but only 32/83 (39%) with the late LB vs. past infection model. Past infection was predicted for 40/112 (35%) of the routine sera, 80% of which correlated with the clinical picture.
Conclusion
The Western blot/avidity Western blot with PLDA approach shows exciting potential for being able to predict disease stage in some patients with LB, which could improve patient management.
Current serological methods cannot distinguish active from past infection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. The aim of this study was to develop an IgG avidity Western blot and assess its potential to differentiate patients with early and late Lyme borreliosis (LB) i.e. active disease, from those infected in the past.
Methods
An IgG avidity Western blot was developed. Penalized linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) was employed to compare the Western blot/avidity Western blot profiles of an evaluation panel consisting of 75 sera from patients with early (n = 26) and late (n = 24) LB and past infection (n = 25). The PLDA models produced were used to predict infection stage for 20 well characterised sera from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Lyme disease serum repository and 112 routine seropositive sera (disease stage unknown), to validate and assess the usefulness of the avidity Western blot/avidity Western blot and PLDA approach.
Results
PLDA correctly classified 40/51 (78%) of patients when early LB and past infection groups in the evaluation panel were compared. Likewise, when late LB and past infection groups were compared, 34/49 (69%) were correct. The resultant PLDA models correctly predicted infection stage for 18/20 (90%) of the CDC sera, validating the use of the avidity Western blot/avidity Western blot and PLDA approach. When tested with the routine sera, 21/29 (72%) tested with the early LB vs. past infection model were correct but only 32/83 (39%) with the late LB vs. past infection model. Past infection was predicted for 40/112 (35%) of the routine sera, 80% of which correlated with the clinical picture.
Conclusion
The Western blot/avidity Western blot with PLDA approach shows exciting potential for being able to predict disease stage in some patients with LB, which could improve patient management.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 71-76 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Microbiological Methods |
Volume | 146 |
Early online date | 6 Feb 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2018 |
Bibliographical note
We would like to thank all the users of the National Lyme Borreliosis Testing Laboratory for their help and support and Rachel Milner, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK for her invaluable technical expertise. We would also like to thank Martin Schriefer and Claudia Mollins at CDC for providing their serum samples. Part of this research was funded by the Chief Scientist Office for Scotland (CZG/2/561). Preliminary results from this study were presented at the 14th International Conference on Lyme borreliosis and other tick-borne diseases ICLB, September 27-30, 2015, Vienna, Austria.Keywords
- Borrelia burgdorferi
- IgG avidity
- laboratory diagnosis
- lyme borreliosis
- western blot