The Difficulty of Justifying European Integration as a Consequence of Depoliticization

Evidence from the 2005 French Referendum

Andrew Glencross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses the 2005 French referendum debate on the EU Constitutional Treaty as an instance of depoliticization. Particular emphasis is placed on the argumentative strategy of President Chirac as, despite the treaty's focus on institutional reform, he eventually chose to justify the document in terms of social policy: an ultimately unconvincing strategy because voters believed it was contradicted by current EU policy priorities. On this evidence, pace Glyn Morgan, prioritizing a justification of EU finality over that of institutions and policies does not seem appropriate. Rather, the priority for integration is to overcome elites' strategies of depoliticization during referendum campaigns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-261
Number of pages19
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

referendum
European integration
treaty
EU
finality
evidence
EU policy
president
elite
campaign
reform

Keywords

  • depoliticization
  • EU constitution
  • French referendum

Cite this

The Difficulty of Justifying European Integration as a Consequence of Depoliticization : Evidence from the 2005 French Referendum. / Glencross, Andrew.

In: Government and Opposition, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.2009, p. 243-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{596ce3baec044c4bb769fc73a27c9cf9,
title = "The Difficulty of Justifying European Integration as a Consequence of Depoliticization: Evidence from the 2005 French Referendum",
abstract = "This article analyses the 2005 French referendum debate on the EU Constitutional Treaty as an instance of depoliticization. Particular emphasis is placed on the argumentative strategy of President Chirac as, despite the treaty's focus on institutional reform, he eventually chose to justify the document in terms of social policy: an ultimately unconvincing strategy because voters believed it was contradicted by current EU policy priorities. On this evidence, pace Glyn Morgan, prioritizing a justification of EU finality over that of institutions and policies does not seem appropriate. Rather, the priority for integration is to overcome elites' strategies of depoliticization during referendum campaigns.",
keywords = "depoliticization, EU constitution, French referendum",
author = "Andrew Glencross",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01287.x",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "243--261",
journal = "Government and Opposition",
issn = "0017-257X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Difficulty of Justifying European Integration as a Consequence of Depoliticization

T2 - Evidence from the 2005 French Referendum

AU - Glencross, Andrew

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - This article analyses the 2005 French referendum debate on the EU Constitutional Treaty as an instance of depoliticization. Particular emphasis is placed on the argumentative strategy of President Chirac as, despite the treaty's focus on institutional reform, he eventually chose to justify the document in terms of social policy: an ultimately unconvincing strategy because voters believed it was contradicted by current EU policy priorities. On this evidence, pace Glyn Morgan, prioritizing a justification of EU finality over that of institutions and policies does not seem appropriate. Rather, the priority for integration is to overcome elites' strategies of depoliticization during referendum campaigns.

AB - This article analyses the 2005 French referendum debate on the EU Constitutional Treaty as an instance of depoliticization. Particular emphasis is placed on the argumentative strategy of President Chirac as, despite the treaty's focus on institutional reform, he eventually chose to justify the document in terms of social policy: an ultimately unconvincing strategy because voters believed it was contradicted by current EU policy priorities. On this evidence, pace Glyn Morgan, prioritizing a justification of EU finality over that of institutions and policies does not seem appropriate. Rather, the priority for integration is to overcome elites' strategies of depoliticization during referendum campaigns.

KW - depoliticization

KW - EU constitution

KW - French referendum

U2 - 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01287.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01287.x

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 243

EP - 261

JO - Government and Opposition

JF - Government and Opposition

SN - 0017-257X

IS - 3

ER -