The distinctiveness effect in forenames: The role of subjective experiences and recognition memory

K R Brandt, J M Gardiner, Neil Macrae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe two experiments that tested the prediction that distinctive forenames would be better recognized than typical forenames and which investigated whether this distinctiveness effect, if obtained, occurred in subjective experiences of the recollective or familiarity components of recognition memory. To that end, the remember-know paradigm was used to measure people's experiences of recollection or familiarity. The results revealed that distinctive forenames were more memorable than typical forenames and that that this distinctiveness effect was present only in the subjective experience of remembering. Additionally, the present research showed that these distinctiveness effects were present after retention intervals of both I and 7 days. These results replicate and extend past research on distinctiveness effects and also provide support for Rajaram's (1996) distinctiveness-fluency account of the 2 states of subjective awareness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-280
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume97
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Keywords

  • recollective experience
  • word-frequency
  • free-recall
  • familiarity
  • novelty
  • retrieval
  • knowledge
  • awareness
  • pictures
  • models

Cite this

The distinctiveness effect in forenames : The role of subjective experiences and recognition memory. / Brandt, K R ; Gardiner, J M ; Macrae, Neil.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 269-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a8c145fa436497c93afafa865af2ce8,
title = "The distinctiveness effect in forenames: The role of subjective experiences and recognition memory",
abstract = "We describe two experiments that tested the prediction that distinctive forenames would be better recognized than typical forenames and which investigated whether this distinctiveness effect, if obtained, occurred in subjective experiences of the recollective or familiarity components of recognition memory. To that end, the remember-know paradigm was used to measure people's experiences of recollection or familiarity. The results revealed that distinctive forenames were more memorable than typical forenames and that that this distinctiveness effect was present only in the subjective experience of remembering. Additionally, the present research showed that these distinctiveness effects were present after retention intervals of both I and 7 days. These results replicate and extend past research on distinctiveness effects and also provide support for Rajaram's (1996) distinctiveness-fluency account of the 2 states of subjective awareness.",
keywords = "recollective experience, word-frequency, free-recall, familiarity, novelty, retrieval, knowledge, awareness, pictures, models",
author = "Brandt, {K R} and Gardiner, {J M} and Neil Macrae",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1348/000712605X73685",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "269--280",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The distinctiveness effect in forenames

T2 - The role of subjective experiences and recognition memory

AU - Brandt, K R

AU - Gardiner, J M

AU - Macrae, Neil

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - We describe two experiments that tested the prediction that distinctive forenames would be better recognized than typical forenames and which investigated whether this distinctiveness effect, if obtained, occurred in subjective experiences of the recollective or familiarity components of recognition memory. To that end, the remember-know paradigm was used to measure people's experiences of recollection or familiarity. The results revealed that distinctive forenames were more memorable than typical forenames and that that this distinctiveness effect was present only in the subjective experience of remembering. Additionally, the present research showed that these distinctiveness effects were present after retention intervals of both I and 7 days. These results replicate and extend past research on distinctiveness effects and also provide support for Rajaram's (1996) distinctiveness-fluency account of the 2 states of subjective awareness.

AB - We describe two experiments that tested the prediction that distinctive forenames would be better recognized than typical forenames and which investigated whether this distinctiveness effect, if obtained, occurred in subjective experiences of the recollective or familiarity components of recognition memory. To that end, the remember-know paradigm was used to measure people's experiences of recollection or familiarity. The results revealed that distinctive forenames were more memorable than typical forenames and that that this distinctiveness effect was present only in the subjective experience of remembering. Additionally, the present research showed that these distinctiveness effects were present after retention intervals of both I and 7 days. These results replicate and extend past research on distinctiveness effects and also provide support for Rajaram's (1996) distinctiveness-fluency account of the 2 states of subjective awareness.

KW - recollective experience

KW - word-frequency

KW - free-recall

KW - familiarity

KW - novelty

KW - retrieval

KW - knowledge

KW - awareness

KW - pictures

KW - models

U2 - 10.1348/000712605X73685

DO - 10.1348/000712605X73685

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 269

EP - 280

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 2

ER -