The dogmatist, Moore's proof and transmission failure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to Jim Pryor’s dogmatism, if you have an experience as if P, you acquire immediate prima facie justification for believing P. Pryor contends that dogmatism validates Moore’s infamous proof of a material world. Against Pryor, I argue that if dogmatism is true, Moore’s proof turns out to be non-transmissive of justification according to one of the senses of non-transmissivity defined by Crispin Wright. This type of non-transmissivity doesn’t deprive dogmatism of its apparent antisceptical bite.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-389
Number of pages8
JournalAnalysis
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Dogmatism
Justification
Crispin Wright
Material World

Keywords

  • dogmatism
  • Moore's proof
  • immediate justification
  • direct justification
  • transmission failure
  • perceptual scepticism
  • Jim Pryor
  • Crispin Wright

Cite this

The dogmatist, Moore's proof and transmission failure. / Moretti, Luca.

In: Analysis, Vol. 74, No. 3, 01.07.2014, p. 382-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdf1a0988b4245c2baa9155b0885afa9,
title = "The dogmatist, Moore's proof and transmission failure",
abstract = "According to Jim Pryor’s dogmatism, if you have an experience as if P, you acquire immediate prima facie justification for believing P. Pryor contends that dogmatism validates Moore’s infamous proof of a material world. Against Pryor, I argue that if dogmatism is true, Moore’s proof turns out to be non-transmissive of justification according to one of the senses of non-transmissivity defined by Crispin Wright. This type of non-transmissivity doesn’t deprive dogmatism of its apparent antisceptical bite.",
keywords = "dogmatism, Moore's proof, immediate justification, direct justification, transmission failure, perceptual scepticism, Jim Pryor, Crispin Wright",
author = "Luca Moretti",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/analys/anu060",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "382--389",
journal = "Analysis",
issn = "0003-2638",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dogmatist, Moore's proof and transmission failure

AU - Moretti, Luca

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - According to Jim Pryor’s dogmatism, if you have an experience as if P, you acquire immediate prima facie justification for believing P. Pryor contends that dogmatism validates Moore’s infamous proof of a material world. Against Pryor, I argue that if dogmatism is true, Moore’s proof turns out to be non-transmissive of justification according to one of the senses of non-transmissivity defined by Crispin Wright. This type of non-transmissivity doesn’t deprive dogmatism of its apparent antisceptical bite.

AB - According to Jim Pryor’s dogmatism, if you have an experience as if P, you acquire immediate prima facie justification for believing P. Pryor contends that dogmatism validates Moore’s infamous proof of a material world. Against Pryor, I argue that if dogmatism is true, Moore’s proof turns out to be non-transmissive of justification according to one of the senses of non-transmissivity defined by Crispin Wright. This type of non-transmissivity doesn’t deprive dogmatism of its apparent antisceptical bite.

KW - dogmatism

KW - Moore's proof

KW - immediate justification

KW - direct justification

KW - transmission failure

KW - perceptual scepticism

KW - Jim Pryor

KW - Crispin Wright

U2 - 10.1093/analys/anu060

DO - 10.1093/analys/anu060

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 382

EP - 389

JO - Analysis

JF - Analysis

SN - 0003-2638

IS - 3

ER -