The economics of alternative crop production systems in the context of farmer participation in carbon trading markets

Yakubu Abdul-Salam (Corresponding Author), Cathy Hawes, Deborah Roberts, Mark Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using scaled up data from an experimental farm platform in Scotland, we examined the relative economics of a conventional and a low-carbon integrated management system for two (otherwise identical) farms. By employing a novel market-based approach, we factored the market costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the relative economics of both systems. Specifically, farmers are considered to be awarded emission credits in accordance with Scotland?s agricultural emissions reduction targets. Farmers are then considered to trade their net GHG emissions in an emissions trading scheme, with the integrated system expected to benefit from this arrangement due to its lower emissions. In further sensitivity analyses, we also considered the effect of premium pricing of integrated system crops on the relative economics of both systems. We find that in both the status quo and emissions trading scenarios, the conventional system is significantly more profitable. In the emissions trading scenario, an emissions price roughly three times the reported median prices over the last five years is required for the integrated system?s profitability to break-even with the conventional system. However, even at prevailing emissions prices, a 20% premium pricing of the integrated system crops enables near parity in the profitability of both systems. We conclude that in order to facilitate greater adoption of low-carbon systems, policies may be needed to encourage farmers? realization of the cost of their externalities, in particular GHG emissions. At the same time, support should be given to a market system that recognizes premium prices for low-carbon system products.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-91
Number of pages25
JournalAgroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date26 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

alternative crops
carbon markets
crop production
production technology
environmental markets
farmers
markets
economics
greenhouse gas emissions
economic systems
profitability
Scotland
carbon
demonstration farms
credit
crops
management systems
farms

Keywords

  • conventional agriculture
  • integrated agriculture
  • economics
  • carbon emissions trade
  • premium prices

Cite this

@article{d3cf95c3ea2940c1aaa33192ba8761e4,
title = "The economics of alternative crop production systems in the context of farmer participation in carbon trading markets",
abstract = "Using scaled up data from an experimental farm platform in Scotland, we examined the relative economics of a conventional and a low-carbon integrated management system for two (otherwise identical) farms. By employing a novel market-based approach, we factored the market costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the relative economics of both systems. Specifically, farmers are considered to be awarded emission credits in accordance with Scotland?s agricultural emissions reduction targets. Farmers are then considered to trade their net GHG emissions in an emissions trading scheme, with the integrated system expected to benefit from this arrangement due to its lower emissions. In further sensitivity analyses, we also considered the effect of premium pricing of integrated system crops on the relative economics of both systems. We find that in both the status quo and emissions trading scenarios, the conventional system is significantly more profitable. In the emissions trading scenario, an emissions price roughly three times the reported median prices over the last five years is required for the integrated system?s profitability to break-even with the conventional system. However, even at prevailing emissions prices, a 20{\%} premium pricing of the integrated system crops enables near parity in the profitability of both systems. We conclude that in order to facilitate greater adoption of low-carbon systems, policies may be needed to encourage farmers? realization of the cost of their externalities, in particular GHG emissions. At the same time, support should be given to a market system that recognizes premium prices for low-carbon system products.",
keywords = "conventional agriculture, integrated agriculture, economics, carbon emissions trade, premium prices",
author = "Yakubu Abdul-Salam and Cathy Hawes and Deborah Roberts and Mark Young",
note = "This work is funded through the Scottish Government Underpinning Capacity and Strategic Research Programme under the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division (RESAS 2.3.9). For running the Centre for Sustainable Cropping platform, thanks go to Euan Caldwell, David Young and Andrew Christie (field/crop management), Andy Steven (agronomy), Gillian Banks, Paul Neave, and Linda Nell (field surveys). All usual caveats apply.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/21683565.2018.1537986",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "67--91",
journal = "Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems",
issn = "2168-3565",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The economics of alternative crop production systems in the context of farmer participation in carbon trading markets

AU - Abdul-Salam, Yakubu

AU - Hawes, Cathy

AU - Roberts, Deborah

AU - Young, Mark

N1 - This work is funded through the Scottish Government Underpinning Capacity and Strategic Research Programme under the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division (RESAS 2.3.9). For running the Centre for Sustainable Cropping platform, thanks go to Euan Caldwell, David Young and Andrew Christie (field/crop management), Andy Steven (agronomy), Gillian Banks, Paul Neave, and Linda Nell (field surveys). All usual caveats apply.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Using scaled up data from an experimental farm platform in Scotland, we examined the relative economics of a conventional and a low-carbon integrated management system for two (otherwise identical) farms. By employing a novel market-based approach, we factored the market costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the relative economics of both systems. Specifically, farmers are considered to be awarded emission credits in accordance with Scotland?s agricultural emissions reduction targets. Farmers are then considered to trade their net GHG emissions in an emissions trading scheme, with the integrated system expected to benefit from this arrangement due to its lower emissions. In further sensitivity analyses, we also considered the effect of premium pricing of integrated system crops on the relative economics of both systems. We find that in both the status quo and emissions trading scenarios, the conventional system is significantly more profitable. In the emissions trading scenario, an emissions price roughly three times the reported median prices over the last five years is required for the integrated system?s profitability to break-even with the conventional system. However, even at prevailing emissions prices, a 20% premium pricing of the integrated system crops enables near parity in the profitability of both systems. We conclude that in order to facilitate greater adoption of low-carbon systems, policies may be needed to encourage farmers? realization of the cost of their externalities, in particular GHG emissions. At the same time, support should be given to a market system that recognizes premium prices for low-carbon system products.

AB - Using scaled up data from an experimental farm platform in Scotland, we examined the relative economics of a conventional and a low-carbon integrated management system for two (otherwise identical) farms. By employing a novel market-based approach, we factored the market costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on the relative economics of both systems. Specifically, farmers are considered to be awarded emission credits in accordance with Scotland?s agricultural emissions reduction targets. Farmers are then considered to trade their net GHG emissions in an emissions trading scheme, with the integrated system expected to benefit from this arrangement due to its lower emissions. In further sensitivity analyses, we also considered the effect of premium pricing of integrated system crops on the relative economics of both systems. We find that in both the status quo and emissions trading scenarios, the conventional system is significantly more profitable. In the emissions trading scenario, an emissions price roughly three times the reported median prices over the last five years is required for the integrated system?s profitability to break-even with the conventional system. However, even at prevailing emissions prices, a 20% premium pricing of the integrated system crops enables near parity in the profitability of both systems. We conclude that in order to facilitate greater adoption of low-carbon systems, policies may be needed to encourage farmers? realization of the cost of their externalities, in particular GHG emissions. At the same time, support should be given to a market system that recognizes premium prices for low-carbon system products.

KW - conventional agriculture

KW - integrated agriculture

KW - economics

KW - carbon emissions trade

KW - premium prices

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/economics-alternative-crop-production-systems-context-farmer-participation-carbon-trading-markets

U2 - 10.1080/21683565.2018.1537986

DO - 10.1080/21683565.2018.1537986

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 67

EP - 91

JO - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

JF - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

SN - 2168-3565

IS - 1

ER -