The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: The efficiency of selective inhibition

Julia Louise Hay, Maarten Valentijn Milders, Arash Sahraie, M. Niedeggen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent visual marking studies have shown that the carry-over of distractor inhibition can impair the ability of singletons to capture attention if the singleton and distractors share features. The current study extends this finding to first-order motion targets and distractors, clearly separated in time by a visual cue (the letter X). Target motion discrimination was significantly impaired, a result attributed to the carry-over of distractur inhibition. Increasing the difficulty of cue detection increased the motion target impairment, as distractor inhibition is thought to increase under demanding (high load) conditions in order to maximize selection efficiency. The apparent conflict with studies reporting reduced distractor inhibition under high load conditions was resolved by distinguishing between the effects of "cognitive" and "perceptual" load.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)885-907
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006

Keywords

  • inhibition
  • perceptual load
  • visual marking
  • motion
  • visual amrking
  • top-down
  • preview search
  • capture
  • cortex
  • blink
  • modulation
  • dimension
  • objects
  • vision

Cite this

The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness : The efficiency of selective inhibition. / Hay, Julia Louise; Milders, Maarten Valentijn; Sahraie, Arash; Niedeggen, M.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 32, No. 4, 08.2006, p. 885-907.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46b6b65d2f764c6899039258fae2d1f1,
title = "The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: The efficiency of selective inhibition",
abstract = "Recent visual marking studies have shown that the carry-over of distractor inhibition can impair the ability of singletons to capture attention if the singleton and distractors share features. The current study extends this finding to first-order motion targets and distractors, clearly separated in time by a visual cue (the letter X). Target motion discrimination was significantly impaired, a result attributed to the carry-over of distractur inhibition. Increasing the difficulty of cue detection increased the motion target impairment, as distractor inhibition is thought to increase under demanding (high load) conditions in order to maximize selection efficiency. The apparent conflict with studies reporting reduced distractor inhibition under high load conditions was resolved by distinguishing between the effects of {"}cognitive{"} and {"}perceptual{"} load.",
keywords = "inhibition, perceptual load, visual marking, motion, visual amrking, top-down, preview search, capture, cortex, blink, modulation, dimension, objects, vision",
author = "Hay, {Julia Louise} and Milders, {Maarten Valentijn} and Arash Sahraie and M. Niedeggen",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.885",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "885--907",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness

T2 - The efficiency of selective inhibition

AU - Hay, Julia Louise

AU - Milders, Maarten Valentijn

AU - Sahraie, Arash

AU - Niedeggen, M.

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Recent visual marking studies have shown that the carry-over of distractor inhibition can impair the ability of singletons to capture attention if the singleton and distractors share features. The current study extends this finding to first-order motion targets and distractors, clearly separated in time by a visual cue (the letter X). Target motion discrimination was significantly impaired, a result attributed to the carry-over of distractur inhibition. Increasing the difficulty of cue detection increased the motion target impairment, as distractor inhibition is thought to increase under demanding (high load) conditions in order to maximize selection efficiency. The apparent conflict with studies reporting reduced distractor inhibition under high load conditions was resolved by distinguishing between the effects of "cognitive" and "perceptual" load.

AB - Recent visual marking studies have shown that the carry-over of distractor inhibition can impair the ability of singletons to capture attention if the singleton and distractors share features. The current study extends this finding to first-order motion targets and distractors, clearly separated in time by a visual cue (the letter X). Target motion discrimination was significantly impaired, a result attributed to the carry-over of distractur inhibition. Increasing the difficulty of cue detection increased the motion target impairment, as distractor inhibition is thought to increase under demanding (high load) conditions in order to maximize selection efficiency. The apparent conflict with studies reporting reduced distractor inhibition under high load conditions was resolved by distinguishing between the effects of "cognitive" and "perceptual" load.

KW - inhibition

KW - perceptual load

KW - visual marking

KW - motion

KW - visual amrking

KW - top-down

KW - preview search

KW - capture

KW - cortex

KW - blink

KW - modulation

KW - dimension

KW - objects

KW - vision

U2 - 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.885

DO - 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.885

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 885

EP - 907

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 4

ER -