The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units: a systematic review

Lindsay E.M. Reid (Corresponding Author), Lotte C. Dinesen, Michael C. Jones, Zoe Jane Morrison, Christopher J Weir, Nazir I. Lone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of acute medical units (AMUs) compared with other models of care and compare the components of AMU models.
Data sources
Six electronic databases and grey literature sources searched between 1990 and 2014.
Study selection
Studies reporting on AMUs as an intervention for unplanned medical presentations to hospital with the inclusion of all outcome measures/study designs/comparators.
Data extraction
Data on study characteristics/outcomes/AMU components were extracted by one author and confirmed by a second.
Data synthesis
Seventeen studies of 12 AMUs across five countries were included. The AMU model was associated with a reduction in-hospital length of stay (LOS) in all analyses ranging from 0.3 to 2.6 days; and a reduction in mortality in 12 of the 14 analyses with the change ranging from a 0.1% increase to a 8.8% reduction. Evidence relating to readmissions and patient/staff satisfaction was less conclusive. There was variation in the following components of AMUs: admission criteria, entry sources, functions and consultant work patterns.
Conclusion
This review provides evidence that AMUs are associated with reductions in-hospital LOS and, less convincingly, mortality compared with other models of care when implemented in European and Australasian settings. Reported estimates may be affected by residual confounding. This review reports heterogeneity in components of the AMU model. Further work to identify what constitutes the key components of an AMU is needed to improve the quality and effectiveness of acute medical care. This is of particular importance given the escalating demand on acute services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-446
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date16 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Length of Stay
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Literature
Mortality
Consultants
Patient Satisfaction
Databases

Keywords

  • Acute medical unit
  • Systematic review
  • Variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Reid, L. E. M., Dinesen, L. C., Jones, M. C., Morrison, Z. J., Weir, C. J., & Lone, N. I. (2016). The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 28(4), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw056

The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units : a systematic review. / Reid, Lindsay E.M. (Corresponding Author); Dinesen, Lotte C.; Jones, Michael C.; Morrison, Zoe Jane; Weir, Christopher J; Lone, Nazir I.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 28, No. 4, 12.09.2016, p. 433-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reid, LEM, Dinesen, LC, Jones, MC, Morrison, ZJ, Weir, CJ & Lone, NI 2016, 'The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units: a systematic review', International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw056
Reid, Lindsay E.M. ; Dinesen, Lotte C. ; Jones, Michael C. ; Morrison, Zoe Jane ; Weir, Christopher J ; Lone, Nazir I. / The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units : a systematic review. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 433-446.
@article{31dd93d40acb439aa1e6712aa49513fb,
title = "The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units: a systematic review",
abstract = "PurposeTo evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of acute medical units (AMUs) compared with other models of care and compare the components of AMU models.Data sourcesSix electronic databases and grey literature sources searched between 1990 and 2014.Study selectionStudies reporting on AMUs as an intervention for unplanned medical presentations to hospital with the inclusion of all outcome measures/study designs/comparators.Data extractionData on study characteristics/outcomes/AMU components were extracted by one author and confirmed by a second.Data synthesisSeventeen studies of 12 AMUs across five countries were included. The AMU model was associated with a reduction in-hospital length of stay (LOS) in all analyses ranging from 0.3 to 2.6 days; and a reduction in mortality in 12 of the 14 analyses with the change ranging from a 0.1{\%} increase to a 8.8{\%} reduction. Evidence relating to readmissions and patient/staff satisfaction was less conclusive. There was variation in the following components of AMUs: admission criteria, entry sources, functions and consultant work patterns.ConclusionThis review provides evidence that AMUs are associated with reductions in-hospital LOS and, less convincingly, mortality compared with other models of care when implemented in European and Australasian settings. Reported estimates may be affected by residual confounding. This review reports heterogeneity in components of the AMU model. Further work to identify what constitutes the key components of an AMU is needed to improve the quality and effectiveness of acute medical care. This is of particular importance given the escalating demand on acute services.",
keywords = "Acute medical unit, Systematic review, Variation",
author = "Reid, {Lindsay E.M.} and Dinesen, {Lotte C.} and Jones, {Michael C.} and Morrison, {Zoe Jane} and Weir, {Christopher J} and Lone, {Nazir I.}",
note = "This work was supported by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh and the Health and Social Care Directorates at the Scottish Government. C.J.W. was supported in this work by NHS Lothian via the Edinburgh Health Services Research Unit.",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzw056",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "433--446",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness and variation of acute medical units

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Reid, Lindsay E.M.

AU - Dinesen, Lotte C.

AU - Jones, Michael C.

AU - Morrison, Zoe Jane

AU - Weir, Christopher J

AU - Lone, Nazir I.

N1 - This work was supported by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh and the Health and Social Care Directorates at the Scottish Government. C.J.W. was supported in this work by NHS Lothian via the Edinburgh Health Services Research Unit.

PY - 2016/9/12

Y1 - 2016/9/12

N2 - PurposeTo evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of acute medical units (AMUs) compared with other models of care and compare the components of AMU models.Data sourcesSix electronic databases and grey literature sources searched between 1990 and 2014.Study selectionStudies reporting on AMUs as an intervention for unplanned medical presentations to hospital with the inclusion of all outcome measures/study designs/comparators.Data extractionData on study characteristics/outcomes/AMU components were extracted by one author and confirmed by a second.Data synthesisSeventeen studies of 12 AMUs across five countries were included. The AMU model was associated with a reduction in-hospital length of stay (LOS) in all analyses ranging from 0.3 to 2.6 days; and a reduction in mortality in 12 of the 14 analyses with the change ranging from a 0.1% increase to a 8.8% reduction. Evidence relating to readmissions and patient/staff satisfaction was less conclusive. There was variation in the following components of AMUs: admission criteria, entry sources, functions and consultant work patterns.ConclusionThis review provides evidence that AMUs are associated with reductions in-hospital LOS and, less convincingly, mortality compared with other models of care when implemented in European and Australasian settings. Reported estimates may be affected by residual confounding. This review reports heterogeneity in components of the AMU model. Further work to identify what constitutes the key components of an AMU is needed to improve the quality and effectiveness of acute medical care. This is of particular importance given the escalating demand on acute services.

AB - PurposeTo evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of acute medical units (AMUs) compared with other models of care and compare the components of AMU models.Data sourcesSix electronic databases and grey literature sources searched between 1990 and 2014.Study selectionStudies reporting on AMUs as an intervention for unplanned medical presentations to hospital with the inclusion of all outcome measures/study designs/comparators.Data extractionData on study characteristics/outcomes/AMU components were extracted by one author and confirmed by a second.Data synthesisSeventeen studies of 12 AMUs across five countries were included. The AMU model was associated with a reduction in-hospital length of stay (LOS) in all analyses ranging from 0.3 to 2.6 days; and a reduction in mortality in 12 of the 14 analyses with the change ranging from a 0.1% increase to a 8.8% reduction. Evidence relating to readmissions and patient/staff satisfaction was less conclusive. There was variation in the following components of AMUs: admission criteria, entry sources, functions and consultant work patterns.ConclusionThis review provides evidence that AMUs are associated with reductions in-hospital LOS and, less convincingly, mortality compared with other models of care when implemented in European and Australasian settings. Reported estimates may be affected by residual confounding. This review reports heterogeneity in components of the AMU model. Further work to identify what constitutes the key components of an AMU is needed to improve the quality and effectiveness of acute medical care. This is of particular importance given the escalating demand on acute services.

KW - Acute medical unit

KW - Systematic review

KW - Variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991810135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw056

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw056

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991810135

VL - 28

SP - 433

EP - 446

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 4

ER -