The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings

a systematic review

Jim McCambridge, Marijn de Bruin, John Witton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

The concept of demand characteristics, which involves research participants being aware of what the researcher is investigating, is well known and widely used within psychology, particularly in laboratory-based studies. Studies of this phenomenon may make a useful contribution to broader consideration of the effects of taking part in research on participant behaviour. This systematic review seeks to summarise data from studies of the effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. These had to be purposely designed to evaluate possible effects of demand characteristics on at least one behavioural outcome under the autonomous control of the participants and use longitudinal study designs. Only 7 studies were included, 6 providing observational data and 1 experimental study, with 5 studies involving examination of possible effects on health behaviours. Although studies provided some evidence of effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviour, heterogeneous operationalisation of the construct, the limited number of studies and poor quality of study designs made synthesis and interpretation of study findings challenging.

Conclusions/Significance

Although widely accepted as important in psychology, there have been few dedicated studies of the effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours outside laboratory settings. This body of literature does not currently contribute to the wider study of research participation effects. A systematic review of data from laboratory-based studies is needed, as are high-quality primary studies in non-laboratory settings. We suggest that unqualified use of the term demand characteristics should be abandoned.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere39116
Number of pages6
JournalPloS ONE
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2012

Fingerprint

systematic review
psychology
Research
experimental design
Psychology
Health Behavior
longitudinal studies
Longitudinal Studies
researchers
Research Personnel
Health
Databases
synthesis
methodology

Keywords

  • behavioral research
  • health behavior
  • humans
  • longitudinal studies

Cite this

The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings : a systematic review. / McCambridge, Jim; de Bruin, Marijn; Witton, John.

In: PloS ONE, Vol. 7, No. 6, e39116, 19.06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7dca15e1c7bf460c9a07f37305d4a239,
title = "The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic review",
abstract = "BackgroundThe concept of demand characteristics, which involves research participants being aware of what the researcher is investigating, is well known and widely used within psychology, particularly in laboratory-based studies. Studies of this phenomenon may make a useful contribution to broader consideration of the effects of taking part in research on participant behaviour. This systematic review seeks to summarise data from studies of the effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings.Methodology/Principal FindingsElectronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. These had to be purposely designed to evaluate possible effects of demand characteristics on at least one behavioural outcome under the autonomous control of the participants and use longitudinal study designs. Only 7 studies were included, 6 providing observational data and 1 experimental study, with 5 studies involving examination of possible effects on health behaviours. Although studies provided some evidence of effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviour, heterogeneous operationalisation of the construct, the limited number of studies and poor quality of study designs made synthesis and interpretation of study findings challenging.Conclusions/SignificanceAlthough widely accepted as important in psychology, there have been few dedicated studies of the effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours outside laboratory settings. This body of literature does not currently contribute to the wider study of research participation effects. A systematic review of data from laboratory-based studies is needed, as are high-quality primary studies in non-laboratory settings. We suggest that unqualified use of the term demand characteristics should be abandoned.",
keywords = "behavioral research, health behavior, humans, longitudinal studies",
author = "Jim McCambridge and {de Bruin}, Marijn and John Witton",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0039116",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PloS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings

T2 - a systematic review

AU - McCambridge, Jim

AU - de Bruin, Marijn

AU - Witton, John

PY - 2012/6/19

Y1 - 2012/6/19

N2 - BackgroundThe concept of demand characteristics, which involves research participants being aware of what the researcher is investigating, is well known and widely used within psychology, particularly in laboratory-based studies. Studies of this phenomenon may make a useful contribution to broader consideration of the effects of taking part in research on participant behaviour. This systematic review seeks to summarise data from studies of the effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings.Methodology/Principal FindingsElectronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. These had to be purposely designed to evaluate possible effects of demand characteristics on at least one behavioural outcome under the autonomous control of the participants and use longitudinal study designs. Only 7 studies were included, 6 providing observational data and 1 experimental study, with 5 studies involving examination of possible effects on health behaviours. Although studies provided some evidence of effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviour, heterogeneous operationalisation of the construct, the limited number of studies and poor quality of study designs made synthesis and interpretation of study findings challenging.Conclusions/SignificanceAlthough widely accepted as important in psychology, there have been few dedicated studies of the effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours outside laboratory settings. This body of literature does not currently contribute to the wider study of research participation effects. A systematic review of data from laboratory-based studies is needed, as are high-quality primary studies in non-laboratory settings. We suggest that unqualified use of the term demand characteristics should be abandoned.

AB - BackgroundThe concept of demand characteristics, which involves research participants being aware of what the researcher is investigating, is well known and widely used within psychology, particularly in laboratory-based studies. Studies of this phenomenon may make a useful contribution to broader consideration of the effects of taking part in research on participant behaviour. This systematic review seeks to summarise data from studies of the effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings.Methodology/Principal FindingsElectronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. These had to be purposely designed to evaluate possible effects of demand characteristics on at least one behavioural outcome under the autonomous control of the participants and use longitudinal study designs. Only 7 studies were included, 6 providing observational data and 1 experimental study, with 5 studies involving examination of possible effects on health behaviours. Although studies provided some evidence of effects of demand characteristics on participant behaviour, heterogeneous operationalisation of the construct, the limited number of studies and poor quality of study designs made synthesis and interpretation of study findings challenging.Conclusions/SignificanceAlthough widely accepted as important in psychology, there have been few dedicated studies of the effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours outside laboratory settings. This body of literature does not currently contribute to the wider study of research participation effects. A systematic review of data from laboratory-based studies is needed, as are high-quality primary studies in non-laboratory settings. We suggest that unqualified use of the term demand characteristics should be abandoned.

KW - behavioral research

KW - health behavior

KW - humans

KW - longitudinal studies

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0039116

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0039116

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - PloS ONE

JF - PloS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e39116

ER -