The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers

Andrew Jones, Ramona Guerrieri, Gordon Fernie, Jon Cole, Andrew Goudie, Matt Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Deficient response inhibition (disinhibition) may play a causal role in alcohol abuse, with impaired inhibition occurring prior to, and acting as a risk factor for, subsequent alcohol problems. We experimentally primed either disinhibited or restrained behaviour while participants completed a Stop-Signal task, before examining the effects on alcohol-seeking behaviour. Methods: Fifty three social drinkers completed a Stop-Signal task following instructions that either emphasised rapid responding at the expense of successful inhibition (Disinhibition group) or vice versa (Restrained group). Subsequent ad lib alcohol-seeking was measured with a bogus taste test. Results: As predicted, participants in the Disinhibition group consumed more beer during the taste test compared to participants in the Restrained group. Furthermore, within the Restrained group only, correlations indicated that those participants who responded more cautiously during the Stop-Signal task subsequently consumed less beer. Conclusions: An experimental manipulation of response set during a response inhibition task, emphasising either restrained or disinhibited responding, has a causal influence on alcohol-seeking behaviour in social drinkers. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-61
Number of pages7
JournalDrug and Alcohol Dependence
Volume113
Issue number1
Early online date17 Aug 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Beer
Ireland
Alcoholism
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • alcohol
  • impulsivity
  • response inhibition
  • stop-signal task

Cite this

The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers. / Jones, Andrew; Guerrieri, Ramona; Fernie, Gordon; Cole, Jon; Goudie, Andrew; Field, Matt.

In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 55-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jones, Andrew ; Guerrieri, Ramona ; Fernie, Gordon ; Cole, Jon ; Goudie, Andrew ; Field, Matt. / The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2011 ; Vol. 113, No. 1. pp. 55-61.
@article{d642579706db48588c042fcba09ad4fc,
title = "The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers",
abstract = "Background: Deficient response inhibition (disinhibition) may play a causal role in alcohol abuse, with impaired inhibition occurring prior to, and acting as a risk factor for, subsequent alcohol problems. We experimentally primed either disinhibited or restrained behaviour while participants completed a Stop-Signal task, before examining the effects on alcohol-seeking behaviour. Methods: Fifty three social drinkers completed a Stop-Signal task following instructions that either emphasised rapid responding at the expense of successful inhibition (Disinhibition group) or vice versa (Restrained group). Subsequent ad lib alcohol-seeking was measured with a bogus taste test. Results: As predicted, participants in the Disinhibition group consumed more beer during the taste test compared to participants in the Restrained group. Furthermore, within the Restrained group only, correlations indicated that those participants who responded more cautiously during the Stop-Signal task subsequently consumed less beer. Conclusions: An experimental manipulation of response set during a response inhibition task, emphasising either restrained or disinhibited responding, has a causal influence on alcohol-seeking behaviour in social drinkers. {\circledC} 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.",
keywords = "alcohol, impulsivity, response inhibition, stop-signal task",
author = "Andrew Jones and Ramona Guerrieri and Gordon Fernie and Jon Cole and Andrew Goudie and Matt Field",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.006",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "55--61",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers

AU - Jones, Andrew

AU - Guerrieri, Ramona

AU - Fernie, Gordon

AU - Cole, Jon

AU - Goudie, Andrew

AU - Field, Matt

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Background: Deficient response inhibition (disinhibition) may play a causal role in alcohol abuse, with impaired inhibition occurring prior to, and acting as a risk factor for, subsequent alcohol problems. We experimentally primed either disinhibited or restrained behaviour while participants completed a Stop-Signal task, before examining the effects on alcohol-seeking behaviour. Methods: Fifty three social drinkers completed a Stop-Signal task following instructions that either emphasised rapid responding at the expense of successful inhibition (Disinhibition group) or vice versa (Restrained group). Subsequent ad lib alcohol-seeking was measured with a bogus taste test. Results: As predicted, participants in the Disinhibition group consumed more beer during the taste test compared to participants in the Restrained group. Furthermore, within the Restrained group only, correlations indicated that those participants who responded more cautiously during the Stop-Signal task subsequently consumed less beer. Conclusions: An experimental manipulation of response set during a response inhibition task, emphasising either restrained or disinhibited responding, has a causal influence on alcohol-seeking behaviour in social drinkers. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

AB - Background: Deficient response inhibition (disinhibition) may play a causal role in alcohol abuse, with impaired inhibition occurring prior to, and acting as a risk factor for, subsequent alcohol problems. We experimentally primed either disinhibited or restrained behaviour while participants completed a Stop-Signal task, before examining the effects on alcohol-seeking behaviour. Methods: Fifty three social drinkers completed a Stop-Signal task following instructions that either emphasised rapid responding at the expense of successful inhibition (Disinhibition group) or vice versa (Restrained group). Subsequent ad lib alcohol-seeking was measured with a bogus taste test. Results: As predicted, participants in the Disinhibition group consumed more beer during the taste test compared to participants in the Restrained group. Furthermore, within the Restrained group only, correlations indicated that those participants who responded more cautiously during the Stop-Signal task subsequently consumed less beer. Conclusions: An experimental manipulation of response set during a response inhibition task, emphasising either restrained or disinhibited responding, has a causal influence on alcohol-seeking behaviour in social drinkers. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

KW - alcohol

KW - impulsivity

KW - response inhibition

KW - stop-signal task

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.006

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 55

EP - 61

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

IS - 1

ER -