The EU Civil Justice Framework and Private Law ‘Integration through (Private International) Law’

Paul Reid Beaumont, Mihail Danov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The diverse nature of substantive private law systems across Europe has amplified the development of an EU Civil Justice system based on harmonized EU private international law (PIL) mechanisms. The authors argue that the problems of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments will be recurrent for courts and litigants in a cross-border context, which may adversely affect the level of litigiousness. After analysing several types of PIL cases brought before the English courts, the authors make the case that there is a need for an appropriately conducted comparative study to collect empirical evidence which explains the cross-border litigation pattern and assesses the effectiveness of the EU PIL instruments. It is concluded that devising an appropriate institutional architecture for the interpretation and application of PIL legislative instruments is key to the creation of a genuine European area of justice as there cannot be rights without appropriate remedies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-731
Number of pages26
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume22
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

framework law
private law
international law
EU
justice
remedies
jurisdiction
interpretation
Law
evidence

Keywords

  • EU law
  • cross-border litigation
  • civil and commercial matters
  • family matters

Cite this

The EU Civil Justice Framework and Private Law ‘Integration through (Private International) Law’. / Beaumont, Paul Reid; Danov, Mihail.

In: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 22, No. 5, 10.12.2015, p. 706-731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b46c255fdbd4feb94dace4def59ec96,
title = "The EU Civil Justice Framework and Private Law ‘Integration through (Private International) Law’",
abstract = "The diverse nature of substantive private law systems across Europe has amplified the development of an EU Civil Justice system based on harmonized EU private international law (PIL) mechanisms. The authors argue that the problems of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments will be recurrent for courts and litigants in a cross-border context, which may adversely affect the level of litigiousness. After analysing several types of PIL cases brought before the English courts, the authors make the case that there is a need for an appropriately conducted comparative study to collect empirical evidence which explains the cross-border litigation pattern and assesses the effectiveness of the EU PIL instruments. It is concluded that devising an appropriate institutional architecture for the interpretation and application of PIL legislative instruments is key to the creation of a genuine European area of justice as there cannot be rights without appropriate remedies.",
keywords = "EU law, cross-border litigation, civil and commercial matters, family matters",
author = "Beaumont, {Paul Reid} and Mihail Danov",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "706--731",
journal = "Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EU Civil Justice Framework and Private Law ‘Integration through (Private International) Law’

AU - Beaumont, Paul Reid

AU - Danov, Mihail

PY - 2015/12/10

Y1 - 2015/12/10

N2 - The diverse nature of substantive private law systems across Europe has amplified the development of an EU Civil Justice system based on harmonized EU private international law (PIL) mechanisms. The authors argue that the problems of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments will be recurrent for courts and litigants in a cross-border context, which may adversely affect the level of litigiousness. After analysing several types of PIL cases brought before the English courts, the authors make the case that there is a need for an appropriately conducted comparative study to collect empirical evidence which explains the cross-border litigation pattern and assesses the effectiveness of the EU PIL instruments. It is concluded that devising an appropriate institutional architecture for the interpretation and application of PIL legislative instruments is key to the creation of a genuine European area of justice as there cannot be rights without appropriate remedies.

AB - The diverse nature of substantive private law systems across Europe has amplified the development of an EU Civil Justice system based on harmonized EU private international law (PIL) mechanisms. The authors argue that the problems of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments will be recurrent for courts and litigants in a cross-border context, which may adversely affect the level of litigiousness. After analysing several types of PIL cases brought before the English courts, the authors make the case that there is a need for an appropriately conducted comparative study to collect empirical evidence which explains the cross-border litigation pattern and assesses the effectiveness of the EU PIL instruments. It is concluded that devising an appropriate institutional architecture for the interpretation and application of PIL legislative instruments is key to the creation of a genuine European area of justice as there cannot be rights without appropriate remedies.

KW - EU law

KW - cross-border litigation

KW - civil and commercial matters

KW - family matters

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 706

EP - 731

JO - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

JF - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

IS - 5

ER -