The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries: What are the odds for success?

Pedro Veiga*, Cristina Pita, Mafalda Rangel, Jorge M S Gonçalves, Aida Campos, Paul G. Fernandes, Antonello Sala, Massimo Virgili, Alessandro Lucchetti, Jure Brčić, Sebastian Villasante, Marta A. Ballesteros, Rosa Chapela, José L. Santiago, Sveinn Agnarsson, Ólafur Ögmundarson, Karim Erzini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A landing obligation was formally implemented in the European Union (EU) for the first time, as part of the recent reform of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). Given the reasonable success of the landing obligation in some countries such as the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Norway, this policy is seen as a viable approach to tackle the long-recognized discarding problem in EU waters. However, there has been some debate on whether there is sufficient evidence to support the feasibility of such a measure in the EU-CFP. The EU landing obligation will implicitly include all small-scale fisheries (SSF) provided the species captured are subject to catch limits or minimum sizes (in the case of the Mediterranean). SSF were included irrespective of the fact that the discarding problem in the EU has been historically associated with medium- to large-scale fleets (in particular largely mixed species trawl fisheries). Additionally, past experiences with a discard ban policy are still limited to specific countries and/or specific fisheries. This paper examined the appropriateness and feasibility of the recently implemented EU landing obligation in SSF. The effects in the long-term are unpredictable, but available evidence suggests that in the short to medium-term a landing obligation is likely to bring more negative social, economic and ecological impacts than benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-71
Number of pages8
JournalMarine Policy
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

fishery
European Union
obligation
fisheries
Common Fisheries Policy
Faroe Islands
Iceland
social impact
ecological impact
ban
Obligation
Small-scale fisheries
economic impact
social economics
Norway
evidence
long term effects
socioeconomics
water
reform

Keywords

  • Bycatch reduction
  • Common Fisheries Policy
  • Discard ban
  • Europe
  • Small-scale fisheries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Cite this

The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries : What are the odds for success? / Veiga, Pedro; Pita, Cristina; Rangel, Mafalda; Gonçalves, Jorge M S; Campos, Aida; Fernandes, Paul G.; Sala, Antonello; Virgili, Massimo; Lucchetti, Alessandro; Brčić, Jure; Villasante, Sebastian; Ballesteros, Marta A.; Chapela, Rosa; Santiago, José L.; Agnarsson, Sveinn; Ögmundarson, Ólafur; Erzini, Karim.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 64, 01.02.2016, p. 64-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Veiga, P, Pita, C, Rangel, M, Gonçalves, JMS, Campos, A, Fernandes, PG, Sala, A, Virgili, M, Lucchetti, A, Brčić, J, Villasante, S, Ballesteros, MA, Chapela, R, Santiago, JL, Agnarsson, S, Ögmundarson, Ó & Erzini, K 2016, 'The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries: What are the odds for success?', Marine Policy, vol. 64, pp. 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.008
Veiga, Pedro ; Pita, Cristina ; Rangel, Mafalda ; Gonçalves, Jorge M S ; Campos, Aida ; Fernandes, Paul G. ; Sala, Antonello ; Virgili, Massimo ; Lucchetti, Alessandro ; Brčić, Jure ; Villasante, Sebastian ; Ballesteros, Marta A. ; Chapela, Rosa ; Santiago, José L. ; Agnarsson, Sveinn ; Ögmundarson, Ólafur ; Erzini, Karim. / The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries : What are the odds for success?. In: Marine Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 64. pp. 64-71.
@article{6694ad9bbfbb45039b23eaa7980c688b,
title = "The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries: What are the odds for success?",
abstract = "A landing obligation was formally implemented in the European Union (EU) for the first time, as part of the recent reform of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). Given the reasonable success of the landing obligation in some countries such as the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Norway, this policy is seen as a viable approach to tackle the long-recognized discarding problem in EU waters. However, there has been some debate on whether there is sufficient evidence to support the feasibility of such a measure in the EU-CFP. The EU landing obligation will implicitly include all small-scale fisheries (SSF) provided the species captured are subject to catch limits or minimum sizes (in the case of the Mediterranean). SSF were included irrespective of the fact that the discarding problem in the EU has been historically associated with medium- to large-scale fleets (in particular largely mixed species trawl fisheries). Additionally, past experiences with a discard ban policy are still limited to specific countries and/or specific fisheries. This paper examined the appropriateness and feasibility of the recently implemented EU landing obligation in SSF. The effects in the long-term are unpredictable, but available evidence suggests that in the short to medium-term a landing obligation is likely to bring more negative social, economic and ecological impacts than benefits.",
keywords = "Bycatch reduction, Common Fisheries Policy, Discard ban, Europe, Small-scale fisheries",
author = "Pedro Veiga and Cristina Pita and Mafalda Rangel and Gon{\cc}alves, {Jorge M S} and Aida Campos and Fernandes, {Paul G.} and Antonello Sala and Massimo Virgili and Alessandro Lucchetti and Jure Brčić and Sebastian Villasante and Ballesteros, {Marta A.} and Rosa Chapela and Santiago, {Jos{\'e} L.} and Sveinn Agnarsson and {\'O}lafur {\"O}gmundarson and Karim Erzini",
note = "Acknowledgments The research leading to this paper was funded by “EcoFishMan – Ecosystem-based Responsive Fisheries Management in Europe”, Project co-financed by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7–265401).",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.008",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "64--71",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries

T2 - What are the odds for success?

AU - Veiga, Pedro

AU - Pita, Cristina

AU - Rangel, Mafalda

AU - Gonçalves, Jorge M S

AU - Campos, Aida

AU - Fernandes, Paul G.

AU - Sala, Antonello

AU - Virgili, Massimo

AU - Lucchetti, Alessandro

AU - Brčić, Jure

AU - Villasante, Sebastian

AU - Ballesteros, Marta A.

AU - Chapela, Rosa

AU - Santiago, José L.

AU - Agnarsson, Sveinn

AU - Ögmundarson, Ólafur

AU - Erzini, Karim

N1 - Acknowledgments The research leading to this paper was funded by “EcoFishMan – Ecosystem-based Responsive Fisheries Management in Europe”, Project co-financed by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7–265401).

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - A landing obligation was formally implemented in the European Union (EU) for the first time, as part of the recent reform of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). Given the reasonable success of the landing obligation in some countries such as the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Norway, this policy is seen as a viable approach to tackle the long-recognized discarding problem in EU waters. However, there has been some debate on whether there is sufficient evidence to support the feasibility of such a measure in the EU-CFP. The EU landing obligation will implicitly include all small-scale fisheries (SSF) provided the species captured are subject to catch limits or minimum sizes (in the case of the Mediterranean). SSF were included irrespective of the fact that the discarding problem in the EU has been historically associated with medium- to large-scale fleets (in particular largely mixed species trawl fisheries). Additionally, past experiences with a discard ban policy are still limited to specific countries and/or specific fisheries. This paper examined the appropriateness and feasibility of the recently implemented EU landing obligation in SSF. The effects in the long-term are unpredictable, but available evidence suggests that in the short to medium-term a landing obligation is likely to bring more negative social, economic and ecological impacts than benefits.

AB - A landing obligation was formally implemented in the European Union (EU) for the first time, as part of the recent reform of the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). Given the reasonable success of the landing obligation in some countries such as the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Norway, this policy is seen as a viable approach to tackle the long-recognized discarding problem in EU waters. However, there has been some debate on whether there is sufficient evidence to support the feasibility of such a measure in the EU-CFP. The EU landing obligation will implicitly include all small-scale fisheries (SSF) provided the species captured are subject to catch limits or minimum sizes (in the case of the Mediterranean). SSF were included irrespective of the fact that the discarding problem in the EU has been historically associated with medium- to large-scale fleets (in particular largely mixed species trawl fisheries). Additionally, past experiences with a discard ban policy are still limited to specific countries and/or specific fisheries. This paper examined the appropriateness and feasibility of the recently implemented EU landing obligation in SSF. The effects in the long-term are unpredictable, but available evidence suggests that in the short to medium-term a landing obligation is likely to bring more negative social, economic and ecological impacts than benefits.

KW - Bycatch reduction

KW - Common Fisheries Policy

KW - Discard ban

KW - Europe

KW - Small-scale fisheries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947983559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.008

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947983559

VL - 64

SP - 64

EP - 71

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -