The EU Renewables Directive - What is the fuss about trading?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerable argument about trading in green electricity certificates (GECs) preceded the publication of the proposed EU Renewables Directive in early 2008. The proposed Directive set a binding target of 20 per cent of EU energy to be derived from renewable energy by 2020 broken down into targets for each member state. Those arguing for trade in green certificates, called certificates of guaranteed origin (GO), included major electricity companies. However, the idea of mandatory trading was opposed by the main renewable energy industry lobby groups. The proposed Directive limited trading in accordance with the demands of the renewables industry pressure groups. Analysis suggests that if member states were forced to trade to achieve a mandatory target of 20 per cent target, then GEC prices would rise to high levels because the demand for tradeable certificates would be much higher than their supply. Trading is unlikely to improve the prospects for meeting the targets. A system of nationally based ‘feed-in tariff’ systems would not face the problems of uncertain certificate prices faced by compulsory trading in GECs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3001-3008
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume36
Issue number8
Early online date2 Jun 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

electricity
Electricity
Industry
energy
industry
directive
price
demand
energy industry
electricity company
analysis
tariff
pressure group

Keywords

  • EU Renewables Directive
  • green electricity certificates
  • trading

Cite this

The EU Renewables Directive - What is the fuss about trading? / Toke, David.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 3001-3008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{292d40b4c11c4faab3d9a7e7977e0b17,
title = "The EU Renewables Directive - What is the fuss about trading?",
abstract = "Considerable argument about trading in green electricity certificates (GECs) preceded the publication of the proposed EU Renewables Directive in early 2008. The proposed Directive set a binding target of 20 per cent of EU energy to be derived from renewable energy by 2020 broken down into targets for each member state. Those arguing for trade in green certificates, called certificates of guaranteed origin (GO), included major electricity companies. However, the idea of mandatory trading was opposed by the main renewable energy industry lobby groups. The proposed Directive limited trading in accordance with the demands of the renewables industry pressure groups. Analysis suggests that if member states were forced to trade to achieve a mandatory target of 20 per cent target, then GEC prices would rise to high levels because the demand for tradeable certificates would be much higher than their supply. Trading is unlikely to improve the prospects for meeting the targets. A system of nationally based ‘feed-in tariff’ systems would not face the problems of uncertain certificate prices faced by compulsory trading in GECs.",
keywords = "EU Renewables Directive, green electricity certificates, trading",
author = "David Toke",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.008",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "3001--3008",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EU Renewables Directive - What is the fuss about trading?

AU - Toke, David

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Considerable argument about trading in green electricity certificates (GECs) preceded the publication of the proposed EU Renewables Directive in early 2008. The proposed Directive set a binding target of 20 per cent of EU energy to be derived from renewable energy by 2020 broken down into targets for each member state. Those arguing for trade in green certificates, called certificates of guaranteed origin (GO), included major electricity companies. However, the idea of mandatory trading was opposed by the main renewable energy industry lobby groups. The proposed Directive limited trading in accordance with the demands of the renewables industry pressure groups. Analysis suggests that if member states were forced to trade to achieve a mandatory target of 20 per cent target, then GEC prices would rise to high levels because the demand for tradeable certificates would be much higher than their supply. Trading is unlikely to improve the prospects for meeting the targets. A system of nationally based ‘feed-in tariff’ systems would not face the problems of uncertain certificate prices faced by compulsory trading in GECs.

AB - Considerable argument about trading in green electricity certificates (GECs) preceded the publication of the proposed EU Renewables Directive in early 2008. The proposed Directive set a binding target of 20 per cent of EU energy to be derived from renewable energy by 2020 broken down into targets for each member state. Those arguing for trade in green certificates, called certificates of guaranteed origin (GO), included major electricity companies. However, the idea of mandatory trading was opposed by the main renewable energy industry lobby groups. The proposed Directive limited trading in accordance with the demands of the renewables industry pressure groups. Analysis suggests that if member states were forced to trade to achieve a mandatory target of 20 per cent target, then GEC prices would rise to high levels because the demand for tradeable certificates would be much higher than their supply. Trading is unlikely to improve the prospects for meeting the targets. A system of nationally based ‘feed-in tariff’ systems would not face the problems of uncertain certificate prices faced by compulsory trading in GECs.

KW - EU Renewables Directive

KW - green electricity certificates

KW - trading

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.008

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 3001

EP - 3008

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 8

ER -