The evaluation of an electronic visual analogue scale system for appetite and mood

Stephen Whybrow, J R Stephen, R J Stubbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate a new electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) system for logging subjective motivation to eat ratings. In total, 10 men and 10 women completed both electronic and traditional pen and paper versions of the questionnaire every hour of the waking day. Subjects consumed a standard medium-fat diet, which was fixed at 1.6.BMR. Correlation coefficients for scores obtained by both methods were significant for all questions, with R(2) values ranging from 67 to 87%. However, Bland and Altman plots and paired t-tests identified significant bias between the two methods for five of the nine individual questions. These were questions that tended to be scored more towards the ends of the VAS. The new electronic VAS produces comparable, but not interchangeable, results to the traditional pen and paper method in the study of appetite and mood, while offering advantages of improved reliability in data collection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)558-60
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Appetite
Visual Analog Scale
Motivation
Fats
Diet

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Affect
  • Appetite
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microcomputers
  • Paper
  • Questionnaires
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Cite this

The evaluation of an electronic visual analogue scale system for appetite and mood. / Whybrow, Stephen; Stephen, J R; Stubbs, R J.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 60, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 558-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac13e866c67b4a549b53e749f4fec213,
title = "The evaluation of an electronic visual analogue scale system for appetite and mood",
abstract = "Our objective was to evaluate a new electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) system for logging subjective motivation to eat ratings. In total, 10 men and 10 women completed both electronic and traditional pen and paper versions of the questionnaire every hour of the waking day. Subjects consumed a standard medium-fat diet, which was fixed at 1.6.BMR. Correlation coefficients for scores obtained by both methods were significant for all questions, with R(2) values ranging from 67 to 87{\%}. However, Bland and Altman plots and paired t-tests identified significant bias between the two methods for five of the nine individual questions. These were questions that tended to be scored more towards the ends of the VAS. The new electronic VAS produces comparable, but not interchangeable, results to the traditional pen and paper method in the study of appetite and mood, while offering advantages of improved reliability in data collection.",
keywords = "Adult, Affect, Appetite, Cross-Over Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Microcomputers, Paper, Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity",
author = "Stephen Whybrow and Stephen, {J R} and Stubbs, {R J}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602342",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "558--60",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
publisher = "NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of an electronic visual analogue scale system for appetite and mood

AU - Whybrow, Stephen

AU - Stephen, J R

AU - Stubbs, R J

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Our objective was to evaluate a new electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) system for logging subjective motivation to eat ratings. In total, 10 men and 10 women completed both electronic and traditional pen and paper versions of the questionnaire every hour of the waking day. Subjects consumed a standard medium-fat diet, which was fixed at 1.6.BMR. Correlation coefficients for scores obtained by both methods were significant for all questions, with R(2) values ranging from 67 to 87%. However, Bland and Altman plots and paired t-tests identified significant bias between the two methods for five of the nine individual questions. These were questions that tended to be scored more towards the ends of the VAS. The new electronic VAS produces comparable, but not interchangeable, results to the traditional pen and paper method in the study of appetite and mood, while offering advantages of improved reliability in data collection.

AB - Our objective was to evaluate a new electronic visual analogue scale (VAS) system for logging subjective motivation to eat ratings. In total, 10 men and 10 women completed both electronic and traditional pen and paper versions of the questionnaire every hour of the waking day. Subjects consumed a standard medium-fat diet, which was fixed at 1.6.BMR. Correlation coefficients for scores obtained by both methods were significant for all questions, with R(2) values ranging from 67 to 87%. However, Bland and Altman plots and paired t-tests identified significant bias between the two methods for five of the nine individual questions. These were questions that tended to be scored more towards the ends of the VAS. The new electronic VAS produces comparable, but not interchangeable, results to the traditional pen and paper method in the study of appetite and mood, while offering advantages of improved reliability in data collection.

KW - Adult

KW - Affect

KW - Appetite

KW - Cross-Over Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Microcomputers

KW - Paper

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602342

DO - 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602342

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 558

EP - 560

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

IS - 4

ER -