The evolution of flight and echolocation in bats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The earliest known complete bats, from the Eocene (49-53 Mya), were already capable of flapping flight and echolocation. In the absence of direct fossil evidence there have been many speculative scenarios advanced to explain the evolution of these behaviours and their distributions in extant bats. Theories assuming chiropteran monophyly have generally presumed the ancestral pre-bat was nocturnal, arboreal and insectivorous. Following this assumption hypotheses can be divided into the echolocation first, flight first and tandem development hypotheses, all of which assume that flight evolved only once in the lineage. In contrast, the chiropteran diphyly hypothesis suggests that flight evolved twice. Evidence supporting and refuting the different hypotheses are reviewed. It is concluded that there are significant problems attached to all the current models. A novel hypothesis is advanced, which starts from the assumption that bats are monophyletic and the ancestral pre-bat was arboreal, but diurnal and frugivorous. After the evolution of flight it is suggested that these animals were driven into the nocturnal niche by the evolution of raptorial birds, and different groups evolved either specialised nocturnal vision (megachiropterans) or echolocation (microchiropterans). A block on sensory modality transfer has retained this distribution of perceptual capabilities ever since, despite some Megachiroptera evolving rudimentary echolocation, and the dietary convergence of some Microchiroptera with the Megachiroptera. The new hypothesis overcomes many of the problems identified in previous treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-130
Number of pages19
JournalMammal Review
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • evolution
  • flight
  • echolocation
  • Chiroptera
  • BASE-COMPOSITIONAL BIASES
  • FORAGING BEHAVIOR
  • INSECTIVOROUS BATS
  • PIPISTRELLUS-PIPISTRELLUS
  • MYOTIS-LUCIFUGUS
  • NYCTERIS-GRANDIS
  • ENRICHED TRACERS
  • FLYING PRIMATES
  • HOVERING FLIGHT
  • GLIDING FLIGHT

Cite this

The evolution of flight and echolocation in bats. / Speakman, John Roger.

In: Mammal Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2001, p. 111-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec909f33ab3d4716acd6507a6dc8b15c,
title = "The evolution of flight and echolocation in bats",
abstract = "The earliest known complete bats, from the Eocene (49-53 Mya), were already capable of flapping flight and echolocation. In the absence of direct fossil evidence there have been many speculative scenarios advanced to explain the evolution of these behaviours and their distributions in extant bats. Theories assuming chiropteran monophyly have generally presumed the ancestral pre-bat was nocturnal, arboreal and insectivorous. Following this assumption hypotheses can be divided into the echolocation first, flight first and tandem development hypotheses, all of which assume that flight evolved only once in the lineage. In contrast, the chiropteran diphyly hypothesis suggests that flight evolved twice. Evidence supporting and refuting the different hypotheses are reviewed. It is concluded that there are significant problems attached to all the current models. A novel hypothesis is advanced, which starts from the assumption that bats are monophyletic and the ancestral pre-bat was arboreal, but diurnal and frugivorous. After the evolution of flight it is suggested that these animals were driven into the nocturnal niche by the evolution of raptorial birds, and different groups evolved either specialised nocturnal vision (megachiropterans) or echolocation (microchiropterans). A block on sensory modality transfer has retained this distribution of perceptual capabilities ever since, despite some Megachiroptera evolving rudimentary echolocation, and the dietary convergence of some Microchiroptera with the Megachiroptera. The new hypothesis overcomes many of the problems identified in previous treatments.",
keywords = "evolution, flight, echolocation, Chiroptera, BASE-COMPOSITIONAL BIASES, FORAGING BEHAVIOR, INSECTIVOROUS BATS, PIPISTRELLUS-PIPISTRELLUS, MYOTIS-LUCIFUGUS, NYCTERIS-GRANDIS, ENRICHED TRACERS, FLYING PRIMATES, HOVERING FLIGHT, GLIDING FLIGHT",
author = "Speakman, {John Roger}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00082.x",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "111--130",
journal = "Mammal Review",
issn = "0305-1838",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolution of flight and echolocation in bats

AU - Speakman, John Roger

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The earliest known complete bats, from the Eocene (49-53 Mya), were already capable of flapping flight and echolocation. In the absence of direct fossil evidence there have been many speculative scenarios advanced to explain the evolution of these behaviours and their distributions in extant bats. Theories assuming chiropteran monophyly have generally presumed the ancestral pre-bat was nocturnal, arboreal and insectivorous. Following this assumption hypotheses can be divided into the echolocation first, flight first and tandem development hypotheses, all of which assume that flight evolved only once in the lineage. In contrast, the chiropteran diphyly hypothesis suggests that flight evolved twice. Evidence supporting and refuting the different hypotheses are reviewed. It is concluded that there are significant problems attached to all the current models. A novel hypothesis is advanced, which starts from the assumption that bats are monophyletic and the ancestral pre-bat was arboreal, but diurnal and frugivorous. After the evolution of flight it is suggested that these animals were driven into the nocturnal niche by the evolution of raptorial birds, and different groups evolved either specialised nocturnal vision (megachiropterans) or echolocation (microchiropterans). A block on sensory modality transfer has retained this distribution of perceptual capabilities ever since, despite some Megachiroptera evolving rudimentary echolocation, and the dietary convergence of some Microchiroptera with the Megachiroptera. The new hypothesis overcomes many of the problems identified in previous treatments.

AB - The earliest known complete bats, from the Eocene (49-53 Mya), were already capable of flapping flight and echolocation. In the absence of direct fossil evidence there have been many speculative scenarios advanced to explain the evolution of these behaviours and their distributions in extant bats. Theories assuming chiropteran monophyly have generally presumed the ancestral pre-bat was nocturnal, arboreal and insectivorous. Following this assumption hypotheses can be divided into the echolocation first, flight first and tandem development hypotheses, all of which assume that flight evolved only once in the lineage. In contrast, the chiropteran diphyly hypothesis suggests that flight evolved twice. Evidence supporting and refuting the different hypotheses are reviewed. It is concluded that there are significant problems attached to all the current models. A novel hypothesis is advanced, which starts from the assumption that bats are monophyletic and the ancestral pre-bat was arboreal, but diurnal and frugivorous. After the evolution of flight it is suggested that these animals were driven into the nocturnal niche by the evolution of raptorial birds, and different groups evolved either specialised nocturnal vision (megachiropterans) or echolocation (microchiropterans). A block on sensory modality transfer has retained this distribution of perceptual capabilities ever since, despite some Megachiroptera evolving rudimentary echolocation, and the dietary convergence of some Microchiroptera with the Megachiroptera. The new hypothesis overcomes many of the problems identified in previous treatments.

KW - evolution

KW - flight

KW - echolocation

KW - Chiroptera

KW - BASE-COMPOSITIONAL BIASES

KW - FORAGING BEHAVIOR

KW - INSECTIVOROUS BATS

KW - PIPISTRELLUS-PIPISTRELLUS

KW - MYOTIS-LUCIFUGUS

KW - NYCTERIS-GRANDIS

KW - ENRICHED TRACERS

KW - FLYING PRIMATES

KW - HOVERING FLIGHT

KW - GLIDING FLIGHT

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00082.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00082.x

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 111

EP - 130

JO - Mammal Review

JF - Mammal Review

SN - 0305-1838

IS - 2

ER -