The friends and family test

a qualitative study of concerns that influence the willingness of English National Health Service staff to recommend their organisation

Mary Dixon-Woods, Joel T Minion, Lorna McKee, Janet Willars, Graham Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives:The views of practitioners at the 'sharp end' of care provision are increasingly recognised as important indicators of quality of care. The National Health Service (NHS) Staff Survey in England has quantified employees' views on how far they would be happy with the standard of care provided by their organisation if a friend or family member needed treatment. We aimed to characterise the concerns that might affect the willingness of staff to recommend their own organisations.Design:Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Data analysis based on the constant comparative method.Participants:Members of clinical and managerial staff in four NHS organisations (n = 70), and senior stakeholders across the NHS including clinicians, managers and others with a strategic or senior-level perspective (n = 98).Setting:One hundred and sixty-eight interviews were conducted: 70 in four case study organisations and 98 across the wider English NHS.Main outcome measures:Not applicable.Results:Asking study participants the 'if a friend…' question offered insider views on the quality of care. Some staff had no concerns, but others, identified significant problems with consistency, reliability and behaviour of staff. Participants identified reasons for poor care that included inadequate organisational systems; structural problems of understaffing and under-resourcing; weaknesses in professional cultures and professional competence and failure to deal with problems such as unacceptable conduct. Participants emphasised that staff were not always able to deliver high-quality care because they worked in difficult conditions.Conclusions:Asking staff to give accounts of their willingness to recommend their organisation to family and friends elicits important insights into quality and safety of care. Such accounts might be able to provide warning signs that could signal organisational decline and avert healthcare scandals, but use outside a research context requires further evaluation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-325
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Volume107
Issue number8
Early online date29 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

National Health Programs
Quality of Health Care
Organizations
Interviews
Professional Competence
Standard of Care
England
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Research

Keywords

  • quality of care
  • net promoter
  • staff concerns
  • soft intelligence
  • National Health Service

Cite this

The friends and family test : a qualitative study of concerns that influence the willingness of English National Health Service staff to recommend their organisation. / Dixon-Woods, Mary; Minion, Joel T; McKee, Lorna; Willars, Janet; Martin, Graham.

In: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 107, No. 8, 08.2014, p. 318-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4965587b54d54d44aa3d20477ef07e0a,
title = "The friends and family test: a qualitative study of concerns that influence the willingness of English National Health Service staff to recommend their organisation",
abstract = "Objectives:The views of practitioners at the 'sharp end' of care provision are increasingly recognised as important indicators of quality of care. The National Health Service (NHS) Staff Survey in England has quantified employees' views on how far they would be happy with the standard of care provided by their organisation if a friend or family member needed treatment. We aimed to characterise the concerns that might affect the willingness of staff to recommend their own organisations.Design:Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Data analysis based on the constant comparative method.Participants:Members of clinical and managerial staff in four NHS organisations (n = 70), and senior stakeholders across the NHS including clinicians, managers and others with a strategic or senior-level perspective (n = 98).Setting:One hundred and sixty-eight interviews were conducted: 70 in four case study organisations and 98 across the wider English NHS.Main outcome measures:Not applicable.Results:Asking study participants the 'if a friend…' question offered insider views on the quality of care. Some staff had no concerns, but others, identified significant problems with consistency, reliability and behaviour of staff. Participants identified reasons for poor care that included inadequate organisational systems; structural problems of understaffing and under-resourcing; weaknesses in professional cultures and professional competence and failure to deal with problems such as unacceptable conduct. Participants emphasised that staff were not always able to deliver high-quality care because they worked in difficult conditions.Conclusions:Asking staff to give accounts of their willingness to recommend their organisation to family and friends elicits important insights into quality and safety of care. Such accounts might be able to provide warning signs that could signal organisational decline and avert healthcare scandals, but use outside a research context requires further evaluation.",
keywords = "quality of care, net promoter, staff concerns, soft intelligence, National Health Service",
author = "Mary Dixon-Woods and Minion, {Joel T} and Lorna McKee and Janet Willars and Graham Martin",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0141076814532392",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "318--325",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine",
issn = "0141-0768",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The friends and family test

T2 - a qualitative study of concerns that influence the willingness of English National Health Service staff to recommend their organisation

AU - Dixon-Woods, Mary

AU - Minion, Joel T

AU - McKee, Lorna

AU - Willars, Janet

AU - Martin, Graham

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Objectives:The views of practitioners at the 'sharp end' of care provision are increasingly recognised as important indicators of quality of care. The National Health Service (NHS) Staff Survey in England has quantified employees' views on how far they would be happy with the standard of care provided by their organisation if a friend or family member needed treatment. We aimed to characterise the concerns that might affect the willingness of staff to recommend their own organisations.Design:Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Data analysis based on the constant comparative method.Participants:Members of clinical and managerial staff in four NHS organisations (n = 70), and senior stakeholders across the NHS including clinicians, managers and others with a strategic or senior-level perspective (n = 98).Setting:One hundred and sixty-eight interviews were conducted: 70 in four case study organisations and 98 across the wider English NHS.Main outcome measures:Not applicable.Results:Asking study participants the 'if a friend…' question offered insider views on the quality of care. Some staff had no concerns, but others, identified significant problems with consistency, reliability and behaviour of staff. Participants identified reasons for poor care that included inadequate organisational systems; structural problems of understaffing and under-resourcing; weaknesses in professional cultures and professional competence and failure to deal with problems such as unacceptable conduct. Participants emphasised that staff were not always able to deliver high-quality care because they worked in difficult conditions.Conclusions:Asking staff to give accounts of their willingness to recommend their organisation to family and friends elicits important insights into quality and safety of care. Such accounts might be able to provide warning signs that could signal organisational decline and avert healthcare scandals, but use outside a research context requires further evaluation.

AB - Objectives:The views of practitioners at the 'sharp end' of care provision are increasingly recognised as important indicators of quality of care. The National Health Service (NHS) Staff Survey in England has quantified employees' views on how far they would be happy with the standard of care provided by their organisation if a friend or family member needed treatment. We aimed to characterise the concerns that might affect the willingness of staff to recommend their own organisations.Design:Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Data analysis based on the constant comparative method.Participants:Members of clinical and managerial staff in four NHS organisations (n = 70), and senior stakeholders across the NHS including clinicians, managers and others with a strategic or senior-level perspective (n = 98).Setting:One hundred and sixty-eight interviews were conducted: 70 in four case study organisations and 98 across the wider English NHS.Main outcome measures:Not applicable.Results:Asking study participants the 'if a friend…' question offered insider views on the quality of care. Some staff had no concerns, but others, identified significant problems with consistency, reliability and behaviour of staff. Participants identified reasons for poor care that included inadequate organisational systems; structural problems of understaffing and under-resourcing; weaknesses in professional cultures and professional competence and failure to deal with problems such as unacceptable conduct. Participants emphasised that staff were not always able to deliver high-quality care because they worked in difficult conditions.Conclusions:Asking staff to give accounts of their willingness to recommend their organisation to family and friends elicits important insights into quality and safety of care. Such accounts might be able to provide warning signs that could signal organisational decline and avert healthcare scandals, but use outside a research context requires further evaluation.

KW - quality of care

KW - net promoter

KW - staff concerns

KW - soft intelligence

KW - National Health Service

U2 - 10.1177/0141076814532392

DO - 10.1177/0141076814532392

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 318

EP - 325

JO - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

JF - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

SN - 0141-0768

IS - 8

ER -