TY - CHAP
T1 - The geoarchaeological evidence
AU - French, Charles
AU - Milek, Karen
PY - 2012/10/28
Y1 - 2012/10/28
N2 - Eleven soil micromorphology samples and associated samples for magnetic susceptity analysis and ICP-AES were taken from remains of a reconstructed grubenhaus at West Stow Anglo-Saxon Village, which had been burnt down in an arson attack. In thin section it was possible to see that the fire had caused reddening of the sandy substrate around the pit to a depth of 1.5-2 cm due to rubification of iron nodules and the clayey coatings around the sand grains, particularly where the sand had been in direct contact with burning timbers. The primary fill of the building, which had had a trampled cellar while it was in use, was significantly more compacted than the secondary fill, and contained only charred wood fragments, while the secondary fill contained charred wood, wood ash, and grass ash (burnt thatch) in the form of grass phytoliths. The significant difference between the primary and secondary fills of this building, and clear evidence for trampling of the primary fills, differ significantly from the fills of many excavated Anglo-Saxon grubenhauser. This suggests that some grubenhauser, unlike the reconstructed building of this study, may have been constructed with wooden floor boards, which prevented the accumulation of primary floor deposits.
AB - Eleven soil micromorphology samples and associated samples for magnetic susceptity analysis and ICP-AES were taken from remains of a reconstructed grubenhaus at West Stow Anglo-Saxon Village, which had been burnt down in an arson attack. In thin section it was possible to see that the fire had caused reddening of the sandy substrate around the pit to a depth of 1.5-2 cm due to rubification of iron nodules and the clayey coatings around the sand grains, particularly where the sand had been in direct contact with burning timbers. The primary fill of the building, which had had a trampled cellar while it was in use, was significantly more compacted than the secondary fill, and contained only charred wood fragments, while the secondary fill contained charred wood, wood ash, and grass ash (burnt thatch) in the form of grass phytoliths. The significant difference between the primary and secondary fills of this building, and clear evidence for trampling of the primary fills, differ significantly from the fills of many excavated Anglo-Saxon grubenhauser. This suggests that some grubenhauser, unlike the reconstructed building of this study, may have been constructed with wooden floor boards, which prevented the accumulation of primary floor deposits.
KW - geoarchaeology
KW - soil micromorphology
KW - geochemistry
KW - reconstructed buildings
KW - sunken featured buildings
KW - grubenhauser
KW - site formation processes
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 978-0956874733
SN - 0956874738
T3 - East Anglian Archaeology Reports
SP - 77
EP - 89
BT - Experimental Archaeology and Fire
A2 - Tipper, Jess
PB - Suffolk Archaeological Unit
ER -