The global subject of precarity

Ritu Vij (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores the universalizing logic of precarity and precariousness in global studies discourse. Originally articulated in the work of Guy Standing and Judith Butler, this logic presupposes a possibility for a global politics of equality between precarious subjects in the North and South based on an emergent shared horizon of suffering. In a close reading of Standing and Butler, I challenge claims about equivalence by calling attention to the liberal analytics that inform their work. Drawing on a postcolonial attunement to historically constituted exclusions, I argue that precarity is better understood as a dis-ordering experience of sovereign subjectivity whose principal referent is the liberal not global subject of precarity. Globalizing the liberal subject of precarity entails the recuperation of its constitutive outside, namely the Third World, as the original site of abjection. The de-politicizing implications of attempts to universalize the subject of precarity are briefly outlined in conclusion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)506-524
Number of pages19
JournalGlobalizations
Volume16
Issue number4
Early online date17 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Precarity
  • globalization
  • liberal subject
  • Judith Butler
  • abjection
  • precariat
  • CRITIQUE
  • LABOR
  • ETHICS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this