The identification in primary care of patients who have been repeatedly referred to hospital for medically unexplained symptoms: a pilot study

Benjamin J Smith, Kelly J McGorm, David Weller, Christopher Burton, Michael Sharpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives
The study aimed (a) to test a method of identifying patients who have been repeatedly referred (RR) from primary care to medical outpatient clinics where they have received multiple diagnoses of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and (b) to describe the prevalence and characteristics of these patients.

Methods
RR patients with MUS (RRMUS) were arbitrarily defined as those with (a) five or more referrals in a 5-year period and (b) a specialist final diagnosis of MUS for at least three of these referrals. A two-stage method of identifying these patients was piloted in one primary care practice: Stage 1 used computerized health service data to identify RR; Stage 2 used manual case note review to identify referrals that ended with specialist diagnoses of MUS. The RRMUS patients identified were asked to complete a questionnaire, a psychiatric diagnostic interview, and their GPs were asked to rate how “difficult to manage” they were.

Results
The process was feasible and reasonably accurate. From 6770 registered patients aged 18 to 65 years, 23 (0.3%) were identified as RRMUS. They accounted for 157 referrals over the 5-year period. Sixteen agreed to further assessment, and 8 (50%) had a current anxiety or depressive disorder. GPs rated only 8 (50%) as “difficult to manage.”

Conclusion
This two-stage procedure offers a practical method of identifying RRMUS patients in primary care as a first step in achieving more cost-effective care. These patients have substantial psychiatric morbidity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-211
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Referral and Consultation
Psychiatry
Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Depressive Disorder
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Anxiety Disorders
Health Services
Interviews
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • case identification
  • health care utilization
  • medically unexplained symptoms
  • primary care
  • depression
  • referral

Cite this

The identification in primary care of patients who have been repeatedly referred to hospital for medically unexplained symptoms : a pilot study. / Smith, Benjamin J; McGorm, Kelly J; Weller, David; Burton, Christopher; Sharpe, Michael.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 67, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 207-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a20dac758c4a48d4a4f2cc1849423acf,
title = "The identification in primary care of patients who have been repeatedly referred to hospital for medically unexplained symptoms: a pilot study",
abstract = "ObjectivesThe study aimed (a) to test a method of identifying patients who have been repeatedly referred (RR) from primary care to medical outpatient clinics where they have received multiple diagnoses of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and (b) to describe the prevalence and characteristics of these patients.MethodsRR patients with MUS (RRMUS) were arbitrarily defined as those with (a) five or more referrals in a 5-year period and (b) a specialist final diagnosis of MUS for at least three of these referrals. A two-stage method of identifying these patients was piloted in one primary care practice: Stage 1 used computerized health service data to identify RR; Stage 2 used manual case note review to identify referrals that ended with specialist diagnoses of MUS. The RRMUS patients identified were asked to complete a questionnaire, a psychiatric diagnostic interview, and their GPs were asked to rate how “difficult to manage” they were.ResultsThe process was feasible and reasonably accurate. From 6770 registered patients aged 18 to 65 years, 23 (0.3{\%}) were identified as RRMUS. They accounted for 157 referrals over the 5-year period. Sixteen agreed to further assessment, and 8 (50{\%}) had a current anxiety or depressive disorder. GPs rated only 8 (50{\%}) as “difficult to manage.”ConclusionThis two-stage procedure offers a practical method of identifying RRMUS patients in primary care as a first step in achieving more cost-effective care. These patients have substantial psychiatric morbidity.",
keywords = "case identification, health care utilization, medically unexplained symptoms, primary care , depression, referral",
author = "Smith, {Benjamin J} and McGorm, {Kelly J} and David Weller and Christopher Burton and Michael Sharpe",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "207--211",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The identification in primary care of patients who have been repeatedly referred to hospital for medically unexplained symptoms

T2 - a pilot study

AU - Smith, Benjamin J

AU - McGorm, Kelly J

AU - Weller, David

AU - Burton, Christopher

AU - Sharpe, Michael

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - ObjectivesThe study aimed (a) to test a method of identifying patients who have been repeatedly referred (RR) from primary care to medical outpatient clinics where they have received multiple diagnoses of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and (b) to describe the prevalence and characteristics of these patients.MethodsRR patients with MUS (RRMUS) were arbitrarily defined as those with (a) five or more referrals in a 5-year period and (b) a specialist final diagnosis of MUS for at least three of these referrals. A two-stage method of identifying these patients was piloted in one primary care practice: Stage 1 used computerized health service data to identify RR; Stage 2 used manual case note review to identify referrals that ended with specialist diagnoses of MUS. The RRMUS patients identified were asked to complete a questionnaire, a psychiatric diagnostic interview, and their GPs were asked to rate how “difficult to manage” they were.ResultsThe process was feasible and reasonably accurate. From 6770 registered patients aged 18 to 65 years, 23 (0.3%) were identified as RRMUS. They accounted for 157 referrals over the 5-year period. Sixteen agreed to further assessment, and 8 (50%) had a current anxiety or depressive disorder. GPs rated only 8 (50%) as “difficult to manage.”ConclusionThis two-stage procedure offers a practical method of identifying RRMUS patients in primary care as a first step in achieving more cost-effective care. These patients have substantial psychiatric morbidity.

AB - ObjectivesThe study aimed (a) to test a method of identifying patients who have been repeatedly referred (RR) from primary care to medical outpatient clinics where they have received multiple diagnoses of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and (b) to describe the prevalence and characteristics of these patients.MethodsRR patients with MUS (RRMUS) were arbitrarily defined as those with (a) five or more referrals in a 5-year period and (b) a specialist final diagnosis of MUS for at least three of these referrals. A two-stage method of identifying these patients was piloted in one primary care practice: Stage 1 used computerized health service data to identify RR; Stage 2 used manual case note review to identify referrals that ended with specialist diagnoses of MUS. The RRMUS patients identified were asked to complete a questionnaire, a psychiatric diagnostic interview, and their GPs were asked to rate how “difficult to manage” they were.ResultsThe process was feasible and reasonably accurate. From 6770 registered patients aged 18 to 65 years, 23 (0.3%) were identified as RRMUS. They accounted for 157 referrals over the 5-year period. Sixteen agreed to further assessment, and 8 (50%) had a current anxiety or depressive disorder. GPs rated only 8 (50%) as “difficult to manage.”ConclusionThis two-stage procedure offers a practical method of identifying RRMUS patients in primary care as a first step in achieving more cost-effective care. These patients have substantial psychiatric morbidity.

KW - case identification

KW - health care utilization

KW - medically unexplained symptoms

KW - primary care

KW - depression

KW - referral

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19686876

VL - 67

SP - 207

EP - 211

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

IS - 3

ER -