The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services

Sam Philip, L M Cowie, J. A. Olson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aim: To ascertain the impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services.
    Methods: An analysis was performed of the screening outcomes of 5575 consecutive patients, who were screened by the Grampian Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme between March and September 2003 according to the recommendations of the Health Technology Board and the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Grading Scheme 2003.
    Results: 3066 (55%) were male. The median age was 65 years. 5.4% were passed on to the level 3 grader and 3.4% were finally referred to ophthalmology services. 2.3% required re- screening in 6 months; 85% were screened without mydriasis; 11.9% had ungradeable images despite a staged mydriasis protocol. Time to complete grading was 32 days ( 22 - 45).
    Conclusion: The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's recommendations on referrals to ophthalmology services is modest and should be containable within existing resources.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)891-896
    Number of pages6
    JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
    Volume89
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2005

    Fingerprint

    Biomedical Technology
    Scotland
    Ophthalmology
    Mydriasis
    Referral and Consultation
    Diabetic Retinopathy

    Keywords

    • aged
    • diabetic retinopathy
    • female
    • governing board
    • government
    • humans
    • male
    • mass screening
    • middle aged
    • organizational models
    • referral and consultation
    • Scotland
    • South Asians
    • eye disease
    • photography
    • prevalence
    • camera
    • age

    Cite this

    The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services. / Philip, Sam; Cowie, L M; Olson, J. A.

    In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 89, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 891-896.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{04c7346cb6404a22a091c0ef9ef9f763,
    title = "The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services",
    abstract = "Aim: To ascertain the impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services. Methods: An analysis was performed of the screening outcomes of 5575 consecutive patients, who were screened by the Grampian Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme between March and September 2003 according to the recommendations of the Health Technology Board and the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Grading Scheme 2003. Results: 3066 (55{\%}) were male. The median age was 65 years. 5.4{\%} were passed on to the level 3 grader and 3.4{\%} were finally referred to ophthalmology services. 2.3{\%} required re- screening in 6 months; 85{\%} were screened without mydriasis; 11.9{\%} had ungradeable images despite a staged mydriasis protocol. Time to complete grading was 32 days ( 22 - 45). Conclusion: The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's recommendations on referrals to ophthalmology services is modest and should be containable within existing resources.",
    keywords = "aged, diabetic retinopathy, female, governing board, government, humans, male, mass screening, middle aged, organizational models, referral and consultation, Scotland, South Asians, eye disease, photography, prevalence, camera, age",
    author = "Sam Philip and Cowie, {L M} and Olson, {J. A.}",
    year = "2005",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1136/bjo.2004.051334",
    language = "English",
    volume = "89",
    pages = "891--896",
    journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
    issn = "0007-1161",
    publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services

    AU - Philip, Sam

    AU - Cowie, L M

    AU - Olson, J. A.

    PY - 2005/7

    Y1 - 2005/7

    N2 - Aim: To ascertain the impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services. Methods: An analysis was performed of the screening outcomes of 5575 consecutive patients, who were screened by the Grampian Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme between March and September 2003 according to the recommendations of the Health Technology Board and the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Grading Scheme 2003. Results: 3066 (55%) were male. The median age was 65 years. 5.4% were passed on to the level 3 grader and 3.4% were finally referred to ophthalmology services. 2.3% required re- screening in 6 months; 85% were screened without mydriasis; 11.9% had ungradeable images despite a staged mydriasis protocol. Time to complete grading was 32 days ( 22 - 45). Conclusion: The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's recommendations on referrals to ophthalmology services is modest and should be containable within existing resources.

    AB - Aim: To ascertain the impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services. Methods: An analysis was performed of the screening outcomes of 5575 consecutive patients, who were screened by the Grampian Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme between March and September 2003 according to the recommendations of the Health Technology Board and the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Grading Scheme 2003. Results: 3066 (55%) were male. The median age was 65 years. 5.4% were passed on to the level 3 grader and 3.4% were finally referred to ophthalmology services. 2.3% required re- screening in 6 months; 85% were screened without mydriasis; 11.9% had ungradeable images despite a staged mydriasis protocol. Time to complete grading was 32 days ( 22 - 45). Conclusion: The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland's recommendations on referrals to ophthalmology services is modest and should be containable within existing resources.

    KW - aged

    KW - diabetic retinopathy

    KW - female

    KW - governing board

    KW - government

    KW - humans

    KW - male

    KW - mass screening

    KW - middle aged

    KW - organizational models

    KW - referral and consultation

    KW - Scotland

    KW - South Asians

    KW - eye disease

    KW - photography

    KW - prevalence

    KW - camera

    KW - age

    U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2004.051334

    DO - 10.1136/bjo.2004.051334

    M3 - Article

    VL - 89

    SP - 891

    EP - 896

    JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

    JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

    SN - 0007-1161

    IS - 7

    ER -