The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict

Chris R. J. Pollard (Corresponding Author), Steve Redpath, Luc F. Bussière, Aidan Keane, Des B. A. Thompson, Juliette C. Young, Nils Bunnefeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Stakeholder cooperation can be vital in managing conservation conflicts. Laboratory experiments show cooperation is less likely in the presence of uncertainty. Much less is known about how stakeholders in real‐life conservation conflicts respond to different types of uncertainty.

We tested the effects of different sources of uncertainty on cooperative behaviour using a framed field experiment and interviews. The experiment compared a baseline scenario of perfect certainty with scenarios including either: i) scientific uncertainty about the effectiveness of a conflict‐reduction intervention; ii) administrative uncertainty about intervention funding; or iii) political uncertainty about the extent of community support. We applied these scenarios to a conservation conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland, involving the management of geese to simultaneously meet both conservation and farming objectives. We asked 149 crofters (small scale farmers) if they would commit to cooperate with others by helping fund a goose management plan given the three sources of uncertainty.

On average, intention to cooperate was highest (99%) in scenarios without uncertainty, and lowest under administrative uncertainty (77%). Scientific uncertainty and political uncertainty both had less of an effect, with over 95% of crofters predicted to be willing to cooperate in these scenarios. Crofters who indicated concern for other crofters suffering the impact of geese were more likely to cooperate. The longer an individual had been a crofter, the less likely they were to cooperate.

Synthesis and applications. Crofters’ intention to cooperate is high but lessened by uncertainty, especially over the commitment from other stakeholders such as government, to cooperate on goose management. Existing cooperation on goose management may be at risk if uncertainty isn't reduced outright or commitments between parties are not strengthened. This has wide applicability, supporting the need for researchers and government advisers to: i) determine how uncertainty will impact intention of stakeholders to cooperate; and ii) take steps (such as uncertainty reduction, communication, or acceptance) to reduce the negative impact of uncertainty on cooperation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1278-1288
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume56
Issue number5
Early online date14 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

stakeholder
cooperative behavior
communication
co-operation
conflict
experiment
effect

Keywords

  • conflict
  • conservation management
  • experimental economics
  • goose
  • uncertainty
  • public-goods game
  • decision making
  • decision-making
  • public goods game

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Pollard, C. R. J., Redpath, S., Bussière, L. F., Keane, A., Thompson, D. B. A., Young, J. C., & Bunnefeld, N. (2019). The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(5), 1278-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13361

The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict. / Pollard, Chris R. J. (Corresponding Author); Redpath, Steve; Bussière, Luc F.; Keane, Aidan; Thompson, Des B. A.; Young, Juliette C.; Bunnefeld, Nils.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 56, No. 5, 05.2019, p. 1278-1288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pollard, CRJ, Redpath, S, Bussière, LF, Keane, A, Thompson, DBA, Young, JC & Bunnefeld, N 2019, 'The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1278-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13361
Pollard, Chris R. J. ; Redpath, Steve ; Bussière, Luc F. ; Keane, Aidan ; Thompson, Des B. A. ; Young, Juliette C. ; Bunnefeld, Nils. / The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 5. pp. 1278-1288.
@article{a75c80de1be14efdae127a0c3027f56e,
title = "The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict",
abstract = "Stakeholder cooperation can be vital in managing conservation conflicts. Laboratory experiments show cooperation is less likely in the presence of uncertainty. Much less is known about how stakeholders in real‐life conservation conflicts respond to different types of uncertainty.We tested the effects of different sources of uncertainty on cooperative behaviour using a framed field experiment and interviews. The experiment compared a baseline scenario of perfect certainty with scenarios including either: i) scientific uncertainty about the effectiveness of a conflict‐reduction intervention; ii) administrative uncertainty about intervention funding; or iii) political uncertainty about the extent of community support. We applied these scenarios to a conservation conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland, involving the management of geese to simultaneously meet both conservation and farming objectives. We asked 149 crofters (small scale farmers) if they would commit to cooperate with others by helping fund a goose management plan given the three sources of uncertainty.On average, intention to cooperate was highest (99{\%}) in scenarios without uncertainty, and lowest under administrative uncertainty (77{\%}). Scientific uncertainty and political uncertainty both had less of an effect, with over 95{\%} of crofters predicted to be willing to cooperate in these scenarios. Crofters who indicated concern for other crofters suffering the impact of geese were more likely to cooperate. The longer an individual had been a crofter, the less likely they were to cooperate.Synthesis and applications. Crofters’ intention to cooperate is high but lessened by uncertainty, especially over the commitment from other stakeholders such as government, to cooperate on goose management. Existing cooperation on goose management may be at risk if uncertainty isn't reduced outright or commitments between parties are not strengthened. This has wide applicability, supporting the need for researchers and government advisers to: i) determine how uncertainty will impact intention of stakeholders to cooperate; and ii) take steps (such as uncertainty reduction, communication, or acceptance) to reduce the negative impact of uncertainty on cooperation.",
keywords = "conflict, conservation management, experimental economics, goose, uncertainty, public-goods game, decision making, decision-making, public goods game",
author = "Pollard, {Chris R. J.} and Steve Redpath and Bussi{\`e}re, {Luc F.} and Aidan Keane and Thompson, {Des B. A.} and Young, {Juliette C.} and Nils Bunnefeld",
note = "Acknowledgements The authors thank the crofting communities of the Uists for their participation and local Scottish Natural Heritage staff for fieldwork support and expertise. Two anonymous reviewers are also thanked for their help in improving this paper. CP was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Grant as part of the IAPETUS Doctoral Training Partnership (NE/L002590/1). Data accessibility The data used in this study are available via the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gk44j56 (Pollard et al. 2019).",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13361",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1278--1288",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict

AU - Pollard, Chris R. J.

AU - Redpath, Steve

AU - Bussière, Luc F.

AU - Keane, Aidan

AU - Thompson, Des B. A.

AU - Young, Juliette C.

AU - Bunnefeld, Nils

N1 - Acknowledgements The authors thank the crofting communities of the Uists for their participation and local Scottish Natural Heritage staff for fieldwork support and expertise. Two anonymous reviewers are also thanked for their help in improving this paper. CP was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Grant as part of the IAPETUS Doctoral Training Partnership (NE/L002590/1). Data accessibility The data used in this study are available via the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gk44j56 (Pollard et al. 2019).

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Stakeholder cooperation can be vital in managing conservation conflicts. Laboratory experiments show cooperation is less likely in the presence of uncertainty. Much less is known about how stakeholders in real‐life conservation conflicts respond to different types of uncertainty.We tested the effects of different sources of uncertainty on cooperative behaviour using a framed field experiment and interviews. The experiment compared a baseline scenario of perfect certainty with scenarios including either: i) scientific uncertainty about the effectiveness of a conflict‐reduction intervention; ii) administrative uncertainty about intervention funding; or iii) political uncertainty about the extent of community support. We applied these scenarios to a conservation conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland, involving the management of geese to simultaneously meet both conservation and farming objectives. We asked 149 crofters (small scale farmers) if they would commit to cooperate with others by helping fund a goose management plan given the three sources of uncertainty.On average, intention to cooperate was highest (99%) in scenarios without uncertainty, and lowest under administrative uncertainty (77%). Scientific uncertainty and political uncertainty both had less of an effect, with over 95% of crofters predicted to be willing to cooperate in these scenarios. Crofters who indicated concern for other crofters suffering the impact of geese were more likely to cooperate. The longer an individual had been a crofter, the less likely they were to cooperate.Synthesis and applications. Crofters’ intention to cooperate is high but lessened by uncertainty, especially over the commitment from other stakeholders such as government, to cooperate on goose management. Existing cooperation on goose management may be at risk if uncertainty isn't reduced outright or commitments between parties are not strengthened. This has wide applicability, supporting the need for researchers and government advisers to: i) determine how uncertainty will impact intention of stakeholders to cooperate; and ii) take steps (such as uncertainty reduction, communication, or acceptance) to reduce the negative impact of uncertainty on cooperation.

AB - Stakeholder cooperation can be vital in managing conservation conflicts. Laboratory experiments show cooperation is less likely in the presence of uncertainty. Much less is known about how stakeholders in real‐life conservation conflicts respond to different types of uncertainty.We tested the effects of different sources of uncertainty on cooperative behaviour using a framed field experiment and interviews. The experiment compared a baseline scenario of perfect certainty with scenarios including either: i) scientific uncertainty about the effectiveness of a conflict‐reduction intervention; ii) administrative uncertainty about intervention funding; or iii) political uncertainty about the extent of community support. We applied these scenarios to a conservation conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland, involving the management of geese to simultaneously meet both conservation and farming objectives. We asked 149 crofters (small scale farmers) if they would commit to cooperate with others by helping fund a goose management plan given the three sources of uncertainty.On average, intention to cooperate was highest (99%) in scenarios without uncertainty, and lowest under administrative uncertainty (77%). Scientific uncertainty and political uncertainty both had less of an effect, with over 95% of crofters predicted to be willing to cooperate in these scenarios. Crofters who indicated concern for other crofters suffering the impact of geese were more likely to cooperate. The longer an individual had been a crofter, the less likely they were to cooperate.Synthesis and applications. Crofters’ intention to cooperate is high but lessened by uncertainty, especially over the commitment from other stakeholders such as government, to cooperate on goose management. Existing cooperation on goose management may be at risk if uncertainty isn't reduced outright or commitments between parties are not strengthened. This has wide applicability, supporting the need for researchers and government advisers to: i) determine how uncertainty will impact intention of stakeholders to cooperate; and ii) take steps (such as uncertainty reduction, communication, or acceptance) to reduce the negative impact of uncertainty on cooperation.

KW - conflict

KW - conservation management

KW - experimental economics

KW - goose

KW - uncertainty

KW - public-goods game

KW - decision making

KW - decision-making

KW - public goods game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063006567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/impact-uncertainty-cooperation-intent-conservation-conflict

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13361

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13361

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1278

EP - 1288

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 5

ER -