The Implementation of Resource Accounting in UK Central Government

David Albert Heald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

At the end of a long process of transition from cash accounting, UK central government departments discharged their public accountability in 2001–02 by presenting Departmental Resource Accounts (DRAs) to Parliament. This article assesses the implementation of Resource Accounting, focusing on timeliness (measured by certification lags) and accounts quality (measured by the property of not being qualified). The descriptive statistics indicate substantial variation in certification lag. The estimated OLS regression model has strong explanatory power. Explanatory variables include those that can be regarded as enduring and those that are attributable to the transition process. The enduring variables are: new DRA, consolidation, audit qualification and pension scheme (whose statistically significant positive coefficients show that these are associated with longer certification lags) and percentage of Appropriations-in-Aid (statistically significant negative coefficient). The transitional variables are Executive Agency and a dummy for 2001–02 (whose statistically significant negative coefficients show that these are associated with shorter certification lags). Potential for shorter certification lags is identified, as are administrative deficiencies that delay the arrival of some certified DRAs into the public domain. Accounts quality improved during the transition period, though problems still occur in some departments that are important in terms of expenditure and assets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-190
Number of pages28
JournalFinancial Accountability & Management
Volume21
Issue number2
Early online date21 Apr 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Resources
Lag
Central government
Certification
Coefficients
Regression model
Parliament
Pension scheme
Audit qualifications
Assets
Timeliness
Statistics
Appropriation
Consolidation
Transition process
Cash
Accountability
Expenditure

Keywords

  • resource accounting
  • audit lags
  • timeliness
  • central government accounting reform

Cite this

The Implementation of Resource Accounting in UK Central Government. / Heald, David Albert.

In: Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, 05.2005, p. 163-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e5ffd2e40bf945cc8677ffc2e583cd75,
title = "The Implementation of Resource Accounting in UK Central Government",
abstract = "At the end of a long process of transition from cash accounting, UK central government departments discharged their public accountability in 2001–02 by presenting Departmental Resource Accounts (DRAs) to Parliament. This article assesses the implementation of Resource Accounting, focusing on timeliness (measured by certification lags) and accounts quality (measured by the property of not being qualified). The descriptive statistics indicate substantial variation in certification lag. The estimated OLS regression model has strong explanatory power. Explanatory variables include those that can be regarded as enduring and those that are attributable to the transition process. The enduring variables are: new DRA, consolidation, audit qualification and pension scheme (whose statistically significant positive coefficients show that these are associated with longer certification lags) and percentage of Appropriations-in-Aid (statistically significant negative coefficient). The transitional variables are Executive Agency and a dummy for 2001–02 (whose statistically significant negative coefficients show that these are associated with shorter certification lags). Potential for shorter certification lags is identified, as are administrative deficiencies that delay the arrival of some certified DRAs into the public domain. Accounts quality improved during the transition period, though problems still occur in some departments that are important in terms of expenditure and assets.",
keywords = "resource accounting, audit lags, timeliness, central government accounting reform",
author = "Heald, {David Albert}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00214.x",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "163--190",
journal = "Financial Accountability & Management",
issn = "0267-4424",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Implementation of Resource Accounting in UK Central Government

AU - Heald, David Albert

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - At the end of a long process of transition from cash accounting, UK central government departments discharged their public accountability in 2001–02 by presenting Departmental Resource Accounts (DRAs) to Parliament. This article assesses the implementation of Resource Accounting, focusing on timeliness (measured by certification lags) and accounts quality (measured by the property of not being qualified). The descriptive statistics indicate substantial variation in certification lag. The estimated OLS regression model has strong explanatory power. Explanatory variables include those that can be regarded as enduring and those that are attributable to the transition process. The enduring variables are: new DRA, consolidation, audit qualification and pension scheme (whose statistically significant positive coefficients show that these are associated with longer certification lags) and percentage of Appropriations-in-Aid (statistically significant negative coefficient). The transitional variables are Executive Agency and a dummy for 2001–02 (whose statistically significant negative coefficients show that these are associated with shorter certification lags). Potential for shorter certification lags is identified, as are administrative deficiencies that delay the arrival of some certified DRAs into the public domain. Accounts quality improved during the transition period, though problems still occur in some departments that are important in terms of expenditure and assets.

AB - At the end of a long process of transition from cash accounting, UK central government departments discharged their public accountability in 2001–02 by presenting Departmental Resource Accounts (DRAs) to Parliament. This article assesses the implementation of Resource Accounting, focusing on timeliness (measured by certification lags) and accounts quality (measured by the property of not being qualified). The descriptive statistics indicate substantial variation in certification lag. The estimated OLS regression model has strong explanatory power. Explanatory variables include those that can be regarded as enduring and those that are attributable to the transition process. The enduring variables are: new DRA, consolidation, audit qualification and pension scheme (whose statistically significant positive coefficients show that these are associated with longer certification lags) and percentage of Appropriations-in-Aid (statistically significant negative coefficient). The transitional variables are Executive Agency and a dummy for 2001–02 (whose statistically significant negative coefficients show that these are associated with shorter certification lags). Potential for shorter certification lags is identified, as are administrative deficiencies that delay the arrival of some certified DRAs into the public domain. Accounts quality improved during the transition period, though problems still occur in some departments that are important in terms of expenditure and assets.

KW - resource accounting

KW - audit lags

KW - timeliness

KW - central government accounting reform

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00214.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2005.00214.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 163

EP - 190

JO - Financial Accountability & Management

JF - Financial Accountability & Management

SN - 0267-4424

IS - 2

ER -