The importance of propolis in patch testing

a multicentre survey

Sanjay Rajpara, Mark S Wilkinson, Claudah M. King, David J Gawkrodger, John S C English, Barry N Statham, Cathy Green, Jane E Sansom, Mabs M U Chowdhury, Helen L Horne, Anthony Ormerod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Propolis is widely used in 'natural' cosmetics, remedies, and over-the-counter products. The incidence of propolis allergy is increasing, and cross-reaction with fragrance mix I (FMII), colophonium, and Myroxylon pereirae can occur. OBJECTIVES: To find out the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive patch tests to propolis and assess cross-reactions with Myroxylon pereirae, colophonium, FMI, and beeswax. METHODS: Two thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight subjects in 10 UK centres were patch tested with propolis and beeswax. Generic data were acquired from British Contact Dermatology Society (BCDS) database and further relevant information was requested by survey of participating centres. RESULTS: The prevalence of propolis allergy was 1.9% (55/2828). Out of these 55 subjects, only 4 (7.2%) were allergic to beeswax, 22 (40%) to Myroxylon pereirae, 15 (27.2%) to colophonium, and 6 (10.9%) to FMI. Additional data for 41 propolis allergic subjects were collected by questionnaire. Hands were the most common sites of involvement, and cosmetics were the most common source of contact. Eight out of 12 subjects reported improvement in eczema following avoidance of propolis. CONCLUSIONS: Propolis is an important allergen of increasing frequency and its inclusion in BCDS baseline series is appropriate. Cross-sensitivity to beeswax is rare.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-290
Number of pages4
JournalContact Dermatitis
Volume61
Issue number5
Early online date28 Oct 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Propolis
Myroxylon
Cross Reactions
Dermatology
Cosmetics
Hypersensitivity
Patch Tests
Surveys and Questionnaires
Eczema
Allergens
Hand
Databases
beeswax
Incidence

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • adult
  • aged
  • aged, 80 and over
  • anti-infective agents
  • child
  • cosmetics
  • cross reactions
  • dermatitis, contact
  • female
  • Great Britain
  • hand dermatoses
  • humans
  • male
  • middle aged
  • myroxylon
  • patch tests
  • perfume
  • phytotherapy
  • propolis
  • resins, plant
  • waxes
  • young adult

Cite this

Rajpara, S., Wilkinson, M. S., King, C. M., Gawkrodger, D. J., English, J. S. C., Statham, B. N., ... Ormerod, A. (2009). The importance of propolis in patch testing: a multicentre survey. Contact Dermatitis, 61(5), 287-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01629.x

The importance of propolis in patch testing : a multicentre survey. / Rajpara, Sanjay; Wilkinson, Mark S; King, Claudah M. ; Gawkrodger, David J; English, John S C; Statham, Barry N; Green, Cathy; Sansom, Jane E; Chowdhury, Mabs M U; Horne, Helen L; Ormerod, Anthony.

In: Contact Dermatitis, Vol. 61, No. 5, 01.11.2009, p. 287-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rajpara, S, Wilkinson, MS, King, CM, Gawkrodger, DJ, English, JSC, Statham, BN, Green, C, Sansom, JE, Chowdhury, MMU, Horne, HL & Ormerod, A 2009, 'The importance of propolis in patch testing: a multicentre survey', Contact Dermatitis, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 287-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01629.x
Rajpara S, Wilkinson MS, King CM, Gawkrodger DJ, English JSC, Statham BN et al. The importance of propolis in patch testing: a multicentre survey. Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Nov 1;61(5):287-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01629.x
Rajpara, Sanjay ; Wilkinson, Mark S ; King, Claudah M. ; Gawkrodger, David J ; English, John S C ; Statham, Barry N ; Green, Cathy ; Sansom, Jane E ; Chowdhury, Mabs M U ; Horne, Helen L ; Ormerod, Anthony. / The importance of propolis in patch testing : a multicentre survey. In: Contact Dermatitis. 2009 ; Vol. 61, No. 5. pp. 287-290.
@article{d517cd2e13ac4be29d3487845d73cc0b,
title = "The importance of propolis in patch testing: a multicentre survey",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Propolis is widely used in 'natural' cosmetics, remedies, and over-the-counter products. The incidence of propolis allergy is increasing, and cross-reaction with fragrance mix I (FMII), colophonium, and Myroxylon pereirae can occur. OBJECTIVES: To find out the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive patch tests to propolis and assess cross-reactions with Myroxylon pereirae, colophonium, FMI, and beeswax. METHODS: Two thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight subjects in 10 UK centres were patch tested with propolis and beeswax. Generic data were acquired from British Contact Dermatology Society (BCDS) database and further relevant information was requested by survey of participating centres. RESULTS: The prevalence of propolis allergy was 1.9{\%} (55/2828). Out of these 55 subjects, only 4 (7.2{\%}) were allergic to beeswax, 22 (40{\%}) to Myroxylon pereirae, 15 (27.2{\%}) to colophonium, and 6 (10.9{\%}) to FMI. Additional data for 41 propolis allergic subjects were collected by questionnaire. Hands were the most common sites of involvement, and cosmetics were the most common source of contact. Eight out of 12 subjects reported improvement in eczema following avoidance of propolis. CONCLUSIONS: Propolis is an important allergen of increasing frequency and its inclusion in BCDS baseline series is appropriate. Cross-sensitivity to beeswax is rare.",
keywords = "adolescent, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, anti-infective agents, child, cosmetics, cross reactions, dermatitis, contact, female, Great Britain, hand dermatoses, humans, male, middle aged, myroxylon, patch tests, perfume, phytotherapy, propolis, resins, plant, waxes, young adult",
author = "Sanjay Rajpara and Wilkinson, {Mark S} and King, {Claudah M.} and Gawkrodger, {David J} and English, {John S C} and Statham, {Barry N} and Cathy Green and Sansom, {Jane E} and Chowdhury, {Mabs M U} and Horne, {Helen L} and Anthony Ormerod",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01629.x",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "287--290",
journal = "Contact Dermatitis",
issn = "0105-1873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of propolis in patch testing

T2 - a multicentre survey

AU - Rajpara, Sanjay

AU - Wilkinson, Mark S

AU - King, Claudah M.

AU - Gawkrodger, David J

AU - English, John S C

AU - Statham, Barry N

AU - Green, Cathy

AU - Sansom, Jane E

AU - Chowdhury, Mabs M U

AU - Horne, Helen L

AU - Ormerod, Anthony

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Propolis is widely used in 'natural' cosmetics, remedies, and over-the-counter products. The incidence of propolis allergy is increasing, and cross-reaction with fragrance mix I (FMII), colophonium, and Myroxylon pereirae can occur. OBJECTIVES: To find out the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive patch tests to propolis and assess cross-reactions with Myroxylon pereirae, colophonium, FMI, and beeswax. METHODS: Two thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight subjects in 10 UK centres were patch tested with propolis and beeswax. Generic data were acquired from British Contact Dermatology Society (BCDS) database and further relevant information was requested by survey of participating centres. RESULTS: The prevalence of propolis allergy was 1.9% (55/2828). Out of these 55 subjects, only 4 (7.2%) were allergic to beeswax, 22 (40%) to Myroxylon pereirae, 15 (27.2%) to colophonium, and 6 (10.9%) to FMI. Additional data for 41 propolis allergic subjects were collected by questionnaire. Hands were the most common sites of involvement, and cosmetics were the most common source of contact. Eight out of 12 subjects reported improvement in eczema following avoidance of propolis. CONCLUSIONS: Propolis is an important allergen of increasing frequency and its inclusion in BCDS baseline series is appropriate. Cross-sensitivity to beeswax is rare.

AB - BACKGROUND: Propolis is widely used in 'natural' cosmetics, remedies, and over-the-counter products. The incidence of propolis allergy is increasing, and cross-reaction with fragrance mix I (FMII), colophonium, and Myroxylon pereirae can occur. OBJECTIVES: To find out the prevalence and clinical relevance of positive patch tests to propolis and assess cross-reactions with Myroxylon pereirae, colophonium, FMI, and beeswax. METHODS: Two thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight subjects in 10 UK centres were patch tested with propolis and beeswax. Generic data were acquired from British Contact Dermatology Society (BCDS) database and further relevant information was requested by survey of participating centres. RESULTS: The prevalence of propolis allergy was 1.9% (55/2828). Out of these 55 subjects, only 4 (7.2%) were allergic to beeswax, 22 (40%) to Myroxylon pereirae, 15 (27.2%) to colophonium, and 6 (10.9%) to FMI. Additional data for 41 propolis allergic subjects were collected by questionnaire. Hands were the most common sites of involvement, and cosmetics were the most common source of contact. Eight out of 12 subjects reported improvement in eczema following avoidance of propolis. CONCLUSIONS: Propolis is an important allergen of increasing frequency and its inclusion in BCDS baseline series is appropriate. Cross-sensitivity to beeswax is rare.

KW - adolescent

KW - adult

KW - aged

KW - aged, 80 and over

KW - anti-infective agents

KW - child

KW - cosmetics

KW - cross reactions

KW - dermatitis, contact

KW - female

KW - Great Britain

KW - hand dermatoses

KW - humans

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - myroxylon

KW - patch tests

KW - perfume

KW - phytotherapy

KW - propolis

KW - resins, plant

KW - waxes

KW - young adult

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01629.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01629.x

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 287

EP - 290

JO - Contact Dermatitis

JF - Contact Dermatitis

SN - 0105-1873

IS - 5

ER -