The influence of forestry on acidification and recovery

insights from long-term hydrochemical and invertebrate data

I A Malcolm, C N Gibbins, R J Fryer, J Keay, D Tetzlaff, C Soulsby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The profile of acidification has declined markedly in recent years, despite significant impacts remaining across large areas of Europe and North America. While evidence of chemical recovery has been reported, the apparent magnitude of improvements depend on the indicator(s) used, the quality of data and length of time series. Evidence of biological recovery is more elusive and questions remain as to the historical and contemporary effects of forestry on acid impacts and recovery.

This study uses long term data (1976–2009) of unusually high quality and consistency to assess evidence of chemical and biological recovery in eight streams with contrasting landuse. Streams ranged from highly acidic (median annual pH 4.1) to circum-neutral (pH 7.1). Significant reductions in non-marine sulphate (NM-SO4) concentrations closely followed reported trends in deposition. Reductions in NMSO4 delivered significant increases in pH and ANC, and reductions in toxic inorganic labile aluminium (L-Al). Significant non-linear increases in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were also observed, potentially offsetting some of the improvements in acid status associated with reductions in NM-SO4. Streams draining large areas of mature or 2nd phase forestry were characterised by greater NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations, and lower pH and ANC than sites with a more modest forestryinfluence or moorland vegetation. Recovery (reductions in NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations and increases in pH and ANC) at sites with a strong forestryinfluence was greater than observed for the moorland catchment. Nonetheless, relative inter-site differences persisted, indicating the continued influence of forestry on hydochemical conditions under contemporary conditions and the legacy of forestry effects from previous decades.

Invertebrate assemblages showed strong relationships with acidification gradients. Constrained ordination indicated that both spatial differences and temporal trends in community structure were strongly associated with pH (and other correlated variables such as ANC) and L-AL. Despite their geographic proximity, there was complete turnover of species between some of the streams, reflecting differences in acid status. Non-linear temporal trends consistent with ecological recovery from acidification were detected in all streams, regardless of their absolute chemical status.

Important questions remain as to the most appropriate way to assess biological recovery given the complicated chemical and biological interactions, the often non-linear nature of change, the potential for chemical and biological hysteresis associated with acidification and recovery, and ongoing debates over recovery endpoints. Consequently, the definition of appropriate recovery endpoints required for the management of landuse and freshwaters remains a significant challenge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-329
Number of pages13
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume37
Issue numberPart B
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

acidification
forestry
invertebrate
invertebrates
aluminum
heathlands
endpoints
acids
land use
moorland
hysteresis
acid
dissolved organic carbon
Forestry
Acidification
time series analysis
sulfates
community structure
vegetation
ordination

Keywords

  • acidification
  • invertebrates
  • chemistry
  • freshwater
  • recovery
  • temporal trends

Cite this

The influence of forestry on acidification and recovery : insights from long-term hydrochemical and invertebrate data. / Malcolm, I A; Gibbins, C N; Fryer, R J; Keay, J; Tetzlaff, D; Soulsby, C.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 37, No. Part B, 02.2014, p. 317-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3346ab61c00c4163b3f3c0211b06f554,
title = "The influence of forestry on acidification and recovery: insights from long-term hydrochemical and invertebrate data",
abstract = "The profile of acidification has declined markedly in recent years, despite significant impacts remaining across large areas of Europe and North America. While evidence of chemical recovery has been reported, the apparent magnitude of improvements depend on the indicator(s) used, the quality of data and length of time series. Evidence of biological recovery is more elusive and questions remain as to the historical and contemporary effects of forestry on acid impacts and recovery.This study uses long term data (1976–2009) of unusually high quality and consistency to assess evidence of chemical and biological recovery in eight streams with contrasting landuse. Streams ranged from highly acidic (median annual pH 4.1) to circum-neutral (pH 7.1). Significant reductions in non-marine sulphate (NM-SO4) concentrations closely followed reported trends in deposition. Reductions in NMSO4 delivered significant increases in pH and ANC, and reductions in toxic inorganic labile aluminium (L-Al). Significant non-linear increases in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were also observed, potentially offsetting some of the improvements in acid status associated with reductions in NM-SO4. Streams draining large areas of mature or 2nd phase forestry were characterised by greater NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations, and lower pH and ANC than sites with a more modest forestryinfluence or moorland vegetation. Recovery (reductions in NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations and increases in pH and ANC) at sites with a strong forestryinfluence was greater than observed for the moorland catchment. Nonetheless, relative inter-site differences persisted, indicating the continued influence of forestry on hydochemical conditions under contemporary conditions and the legacy of forestry effects from previous decades.Invertebrate assemblages showed strong relationships with acidification gradients. Constrained ordination indicated that both spatial differences and temporal trends in community structure were strongly associated with pH (and other correlated variables such as ANC) and L-AL. Despite their geographic proximity, there was complete turnover of species between some of the streams, reflecting differences in acid status. Non-linear temporal trends consistent with ecological recovery from acidification were detected in all streams, regardless of their absolute chemical status.Important questions remain as to the most appropriate way to assess biological recovery given the complicated chemical and biological interactions, the often non-linear nature of change, the potential for chemical and biological hysteresis associated with acidification and recovery, and ongoing debates over recovery endpoints. Consequently, the definition of appropriate recovery endpoints required for the management of landuse and freshwaters remains a significant challenge.",
keywords = "acidification, invertebrates, chemistry, freshwater, recovery, temporal trends",
author = "Malcolm, {I A} and Gibbins, {C N} and Fryer, {R J} and J Keay and D Tetzlaff and C Soulsby",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.011",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "317--329",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part B",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of forestry on acidification and recovery

T2 - insights from long-term hydrochemical and invertebrate data

AU - Malcolm, I A

AU - Gibbins, C N

AU - Fryer, R J

AU - Keay, J

AU - Tetzlaff, D

AU - Soulsby, C

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - The profile of acidification has declined markedly in recent years, despite significant impacts remaining across large areas of Europe and North America. While evidence of chemical recovery has been reported, the apparent magnitude of improvements depend on the indicator(s) used, the quality of data and length of time series. Evidence of biological recovery is more elusive and questions remain as to the historical and contemporary effects of forestry on acid impacts and recovery.This study uses long term data (1976–2009) of unusually high quality and consistency to assess evidence of chemical and biological recovery in eight streams with contrasting landuse. Streams ranged from highly acidic (median annual pH 4.1) to circum-neutral (pH 7.1). Significant reductions in non-marine sulphate (NM-SO4) concentrations closely followed reported trends in deposition. Reductions in NMSO4 delivered significant increases in pH and ANC, and reductions in toxic inorganic labile aluminium (L-Al). Significant non-linear increases in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were also observed, potentially offsetting some of the improvements in acid status associated with reductions in NM-SO4. Streams draining large areas of mature or 2nd phase forestry were characterised by greater NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations, and lower pH and ANC than sites with a more modest forestryinfluence or moorland vegetation. Recovery (reductions in NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations and increases in pH and ANC) at sites with a strong forestryinfluence was greater than observed for the moorland catchment. Nonetheless, relative inter-site differences persisted, indicating the continued influence of forestry on hydochemical conditions under contemporary conditions and the legacy of forestry effects from previous decades.Invertebrate assemblages showed strong relationships with acidification gradients. Constrained ordination indicated that both spatial differences and temporal trends in community structure were strongly associated with pH (and other correlated variables such as ANC) and L-AL. Despite their geographic proximity, there was complete turnover of species between some of the streams, reflecting differences in acid status. Non-linear temporal trends consistent with ecological recovery from acidification were detected in all streams, regardless of their absolute chemical status.Important questions remain as to the most appropriate way to assess biological recovery given the complicated chemical and biological interactions, the often non-linear nature of change, the potential for chemical and biological hysteresis associated with acidification and recovery, and ongoing debates over recovery endpoints. Consequently, the definition of appropriate recovery endpoints required for the management of landuse and freshwaters remains a significant challenge.

AB - The profile of acidification has declined markedly in recent years, despite significant impacts remaining across large areas of Europe and North America. While evidence of chemical recovery has been reported, the apparent magnitude of improvements depend on the indicator(s) used, the quality of data and length of time series. Evidence of biological recovery is more elusive and questions remain as to the historical and contemporary effects of forestry on acid impacts and recovery.This study uses long term data (1976–2009) of unusually high quality and consistency to assess evidence of chemical and biological recovery in eight streams with contrasting landuse. Streams ranged from highly acidic (median annual pH 4.1) to circum-neutral (pH 7.1). Significant reductions in non-marine sulphate (NM-SO4) concentrations closely followed reported trends in deposition. Reductions in NMSO4 delivered significant increases in pH and ANC, and reductions in toxic inorganic labile aluminium (L-Al). Significant non-linear increases in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were also observed, potentially offsetting some of the improvements in acid status associated with reductions in NM-SO4. Streams draining large areas of mature or 2nd phase forestry were characterised by greater NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations, and lower pH and ANC than sites with a more modest forestryinfluence or moorland vegetation. Recovery (reductions in NM-SO4 and L-Al concentrations and increases in pH and ANC) at sites with a strong forestryinfluence was greater than observed for the moorland catchment. Nonetheless, relative inter-site differences persisted, indicating the continued influence of forestry on hydochemical conditions under contemporary conditions and the legacy of forestry effects from previous decades.Invertebrate assemblages showed strong relationships with acidification gradients. Constrained ordination indicated that both spatial differences and temporal trends in community structure were strongly associated with pH (and other correlated variables such as ANC) and L-AL. Despite their geographic proximity, there was complete turnover of species between some of the streams, reflecting differences in acid status. Non-linear temporal trends consistent with ecological recovery from acidification were detected in all streams, regardless of their absolute chemical status.Important questions remain as to the most appropriate way to assess biological recovery given the complicated chemical and biological interactions, the often non-linear nature of change, the potential for chemical and biological hysteresis associated with acidification and recovery, and ongoing debates over recovery endpoints. Consequently, the definition of appropriate recovery endpoints required for the management of landuse and freshwaters remains a significant challenge.

KW - acidification

KW - invertebrates

KW - chemistry

KW - freshwater

KW - recovery

KW - temporal trends

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.011

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 317

EP - 329

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

IS - Part B

ER -