The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences

Sheila Cunningham, Phil Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-150
Number of pages22
JournalSexualities, Evolution & Gender
Volume6
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

gender role
social attraction
Sex Characteristics
commitment
psychologist
Regression Analysis
Psychology
regression
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • partner preferences
  • sex differences
  • gender roles
  • trade-off threshold model

Cite this

The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences. / Cunningham, Sheila; Russell, Phil.

In: Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, Vol. 6, No. 2-3, 2004, p. 131-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, Sheila ; Russell, Phil. / The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences. In: Sexualities, Evolution & Gender. 2004 ; Vol. 6, No. 2-3. pp. 131-150.
@article{5582af3427aa405b95d2858b51d705ea,
title = "The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences",
abstract = "Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.",
keywords = "partner preferences, sex differences, gender roles, trade-off threshold model",
author = "Sheila Cunningham and Phil Russell",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1080/14616660412331332909",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "131--150",
journal = "Sexualities, Evolution & Gender",
issn = "1479-2508",
publisher = "Brunner - Routledge (US)",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences

AU - Cunningham, Sheila

AU - Russell, Phil

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.

AB - Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.

KW - partner preferences

KW - sex differences

KW - gender roles

KW - trade-off threshold model

U2 - 10.1080/14616660412331332909

DO - 10.1080/14616660412331332909

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 131

EP - 150

JO - Sexualities, Evolution & Gender

JF - Sexualities, Evolution & Gender

SN - 1479-2508

IS - 2-3

ER -