The influence of social capital on health in eight former Soviet Countries

why does it differ?

Beatrice d'Hombres, Lorenzo Rocco, Marc Suhrcke, Christian W. Haerpfer, Martin McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Previous research has identified the role of social capital in explaining variations in health in the countries of the former Soviet Union. This study explores whether the benefits of social capital vary among these countries and why.

Methods The impact of micro social capital (trust, membership and social isolation) on individual health was estimated in each of eight former Soviet republics using instrumental variables to overcome methodological hazards such as endogeneity and reverse causality. Interactions with institutional variables (voice and accountability, effectiveness of the legal system, informal economy) and social protection variables (employment protection, old age and disability benefits, sickness and health benefits) were examined.

Results Most social capital indicators, in most countries, are associated with better health but the magnitude and significance of the impact differ between countries. Some of this variation can be explained by interacting social capital indicators with measures of institutional quality, with membership of organisations bringing greater benefit for health in countries where civil liberties are stronger, whereas social isolation has more adverse consequences where there is a large informal economy. A lesser amount is explained by the interaction of social capital indicators with selected measures of social protection.

Conclusion When considering interventions to improve social capital as a means of improving population health, it seems advisable to take into account the influence of macrocontextual variables, in order not to overstate or understate the likely impact of the intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-50
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume65
Issue number1
Early online date26 Oct 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Health
Social Isolation
Insurance Benefits
Public Policy
USSR
Social Responsibility
Social Capital
Causality
Organizations
Research
Population

Keywords

  • mortality crisis
  • union

Cite this

The influence of social capital on health in eight former Soviet Countries : why does it differ? / d'Hombres, Beatrice; Rocco, Lorenzo; Suhrcke, Marc; Haerpfer, Christian W.; McKee, Martin.

In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 44-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

d'Hombres, Beatrice ; Rocco, Lorenzo ; Suhrcke, Marc ; Haerpfer, Christian W. ; McKee, Martin. / The influence of social capital on health in eight former Soviet Countries : why does it differ?. In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2011 ; Vol. 65, No. 1. pp. 44-50.
@article{24ab733669164401a7e6f535d1d59ec9,
title = "The influence of social capital on health in eight former Soviet Countries: why does it differ?",
abstract = "Background Previous research has identified the role of social capital in explaining variations in health in the countries of the former Soviet Union. This study explores whether the benefits of social capital vary among these countries and why.Methods The impact of micro social capital (trust, membership and social isolation) on individual health was estimated in each of eight former Soviet republics using instrumental variables to overcome methodological hazards such as endogeneity and reverse causality. Interactions with institutional variables (voice and accountability, effectiveness of the legal system, informal economy) and social protection variables (employment protection, old age and disability benefits, sickness and health benefits) were examined.Results Most social capital indicators, in most countries, are associated with better health but the magnitude and significance of the impact differ between countries. Some of this variation can be explained by interacting social capital indicators with measures of institutional quality, with membership of organisations bringing greater benefit for health in countries where civil liberties are stronger, whereas social isolation has more adverse consequences where there is a large informal economy. A lesser amount is explained by the interaction of social capital indicators with selected measures of social protection.Conclusion When considering interventions to improve social capital as a means of improving population health, it seems advisable to take into account the influence of macrocontextual variables, in order not to overstate or understate the likely impact of the intervention.",
keywords = "mortality crisis, union",
author = "Beatrice d'Hombres and Lorenzo Rocco and Marc Suhrcke and Haerpfer, {Christian W.} and Martin McKee",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jech.2009.097592",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "44--50",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health",
issn = "0143-005X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of social capital on health in eight former Soviet Countries

T2 - why does it differ?

AU - d'Hombres, Beatrice

AU - Rocco, Lorenzo

AU - Suhrcke, Marc

AU - Haerpfer, Christian W.

AU - McKee, Martin

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background Previous research has identified the role of social capital in explaining variations in health in the countries of the former Soviet Union. This study explores whether the benefits of social capital vary among these countries and why.Methods The impact of micro social capital (trust, membership and social isolation) on individual health was estimated in each of eight former Soviet republics using instrumental variables to overcome methodological hazards such as endogeneity and reverse causality. Interactions with institutional variables (voice and accountability, effectiveness of the legal system, informal economy) and social protection variables (employment protection, old age and disability benefits, sickness and health benefits) were examined.Results Most social capital indicators, in most countries, are associated with better health but the magnitude and significance of the impact differ between countries. Some of this variation can be explained by interacting social capital indicators with measures of institutional quality, with membership of organisations bringing greater benefit for health in countries where civil liberties are stronger, whereas social isolation has more adverse consequences where there is a large informal economy. A lesser amount is explained by the interaction of social capital indicators with selected measures of social protection.Conclusion When considering interventions to improve social capital as a means of improving population health, it seems advisable to take into account the influence of macrocontextual variables, in order not to overstate or understate the likely impact of the intervention.

AB - Background Previous research has identified the role of social capital in explaining variations in health in the countries of the former Soviet Union. This study explores whether the benefits of social capital vary among these countries and why.Methods The impact of micro social capital (trust, membership and social isolation) on individual health was estimated in each of eight former Soviet republics using instrumental variables to overcome methodological hazards such as endogeneity and reverse causality. Interactions with institutional variables (voice and accountability, effectiveness of the legal system, informal economy) and social protection variables (employment protection, old age and disability benefits, sickness and health benefits) were examined.Results Most social capital indicators, in most countries, are associated with better health but the magnitude and significance of the impact differ between countries. Some of this variation can be explained by interacting social capital indicators with measures of institutional quality, with membership of organisations bringing greater benefit for health in countries where civil liberties are stronger, whereas social isolation has more adverse consequences where there is a large informal economy. A lesser amount is explained by the interaction of social capital indicators with selected measures of social protection.Conclusion When considering interventions to improve social capital as a means of improving population health, it seems advisable to take into account the influence of macrocontextual variables, in order not to overstate or understate the likely impact of the intervention.

KW - mortality crisis

KW - union

U2 - 10.1136/jech.2009.097592

DO - 10.1136/jech.2009.097592

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 44

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 0143-005X

IS - 1

ER -