The international mediation of power-sharing settlements

Allison McCulloch (Corresponding Author), Joanne McEvoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Power sharing is largely accepted among scholars and policy-makers as a potentially effective mechanism for building peace in the aftermath of violent ethnic conflicts and self-determination disputes. Although the operation of power sharing may be prone to ongoing challenges and even political crises arising from the legacy of the conflict, international actors continue to promote power-sharing arrangements to manage self-determination and other ethnopolitical conflicts. This article investigates the normative and instrumental reasons why third-party mediators (on behalf of international organizations and/or states) turn to power-sharing strategies during peace negotiations. It considers the reasons why third-party mediators promote power sharing when its maintenance is likely to depend on their ongoing commitment and governance involvement. We argue that mediators draw from four different perspectives in their support of power-sharing settlements: international law, regional and internal security, democracy and minority rights, and a technical approach where mediators focus on the mechanics of power-sharing designs. The article draws on in-depth semi-structured interviews with officials from the United Nations and the European Union working for the organizations’ respective mediation units as well as documentary analysis of official mediation documents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-485
Number of pages19
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume53
Issue number4
Early online date10 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

mediation
self-determination
peace negotiation
minority rights
international conflict
political crisis
ethnic conflict
International Organizations
mechanic
international law
UNO
peace
commitment
governance
democracy
interview

Keywords

  • conflict mediation
  • ethnic conflict
  • external actors
  • power sharing
  • self-determination disputes

Cite this

The international mediation of power-sharing settlements. / McCulloch, Allison (Corresponding Author); McEvoy, Joanne.

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 53, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 467-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCulloch, Allison ; McEvoy, Joanne. / The international mediation of power-sharing settlements. In: Cooperation and Conflict. 2018 ; Vol. 53, No. 4. pp. 467-485.
@article{20a648c55b144c64a05da18838c1ca27,
title = "The international mediation of power-sharing settlements",
abstract = "Power sharing is largely accepted among scholars and policy-makers as a potentially effective mechanism for building peace in the aftermath of violent ethnic conflicts and self-determination disputes. Although the operation of power sharing may be prone to ongoing challenges and even political crises arising from the legacy of the conflict, international actors continue to promote power-sharing arrangements to manage self-determination and other ethnopolitical conflicts. This article investigates the normative and instrumental reasons why third-party mediators (on behalf of international organizations and/or states) turn to power-sharing strategies during peace negotiations. It considers the reasons why third-party mediators promote power sharing when its maintenance is likely to depend on their ongoing commitment and governance involvement. We argue that mediators draw from four different perspectives in their support of power-sharing settlements: international law, regional and internal security, democracy and minority rights, and a technical approach where mediators focus on the mechanics of power-sharing designs. The article draws on in-depth semi-structured interviews with officials from the United Nations and the European Union working for the organizations’ respective mediation units as well as documentary analysis of official mediation documents.",
keywords = "conflict mediation, ethnic conflict, external actors, power sharing, self-determination disputes",
author = "Allison McCulloch and Joanne McEvoy",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010836718761760",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "467--485",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The international mediation of power-sharing settlements

AU - McCulloch, Allison

AU - McEvoy, Joanne

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Power sharing is largely accepted among scholars and policy-makers as a potentially effective mechanism for building peace in the aftermath of violent ethnic conflicts and self-determination disputes. Although the operation of power sharing may be prone to ongoing challenges and even political crises arising from the legacy of the conflict, international actors continue to promote power-sharing arrangements to manage self-determination and other ethnopolitical conflicts. This article investigates the normative and instrumental reasons why third-party mediators (on behalf of international organizations and/or states) turn to power-sharing strategies during peace negotiations. It considers the reasons why third-party mediators promote power sharing when its maintenance is likely to depend on their ongoing commitment and governance involvement. We argue that mediators draw from four different perspectives in their support of power-sharing settlements: international law, regional and internal security, democracy and minority rights, and a technical approach where mediators focus on the mechanics of power-sharing designs. The article draws on in-depth semi-structured interviews with officials from the United Nations and the European Union working for the organizations’ respective mediation units as well as documentary analysis of official mediation documents.

AB - Power sharing is largely accepted among scholars and policy-makers as a potentially effective mechanism for building peace in the aftermath of violent ethnic conflicts and self-determination disputes. Although the operation of power sharing may be prone to ongoing challenges and even political crises arising from the legacy of the conflict, international actors continue to promote power-sharing arrangements to manage self-determination and other ethnopolitical conflicts. This article investigates the normative and instrumental reasons why third-party mediators (on behalf of international organizations and/or states) turn to power-sharing strategies during peace negotiations. It considers the reasons why third-party mediators promote power sharing when its maintenance is likely to depend on their ongoing commitment and governance involvement. We argue that mediators draw from four different perspectives in their support of power-sharing settlements: international law, regional and internal security, democracy and minority rights, and a technical approach where mediators focus on the mechanics of power-sharing designs. The article draws on in-depth semi-structured interviews with officials from the United Nations and the European Union working for the organizations’ respective mediation units as well as documentary analysis of official mediation documents.

KW - conflict mediation

KW - ethnic conflict

KW - external actors

KW - power sharing

KW - self-determination disputes

U2 - 10.1177/0010836718761760

DO - 10.1177/0010836718761760

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 467

EP - 485

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 4

ER -