The interpretation of vertical sequences in turbidite beds: the influence of longitudinal flow structure

Benjamin Charles Kneller, W. D. McCaffrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because turbidite beds aggrade progressively beneath a moving current, the vertical grain-size profile of a bed is generally an indication of the longitudinal velocity structure of the flow, and longitudinal gradients in suspended sediment concentration ("density"). A current is more likely to show a simple waning flow history farther from its source; this is because faster-moving parts of the flow overtake slower moving parts, and the flow organizes itself over time so that the fastest parts are at the front. Thus distal (e.g., basin plain) turbidites commonly show simple, normally graded profiles, whereas more proximal turbidites often show complex vertical sequences within a bed, related to unsteadiness. A turbidity current may deposit a structureless, poorly sorted bed where the capacity of the current is exceeded, i.e., where there is insufficient turbulent kinetic energy to maintain the entire suspended mass. Capacity-driven deposition may occur where the flow decelerates. Where flow nonuniformity is the cause of capacity-driven deposition, a massive interval will form the lowest part of the bed, and will have a flat base. Where flow unsteadiness is the cause, a normally graded massive interval may overlie erosional features or traction structures at the base of the bed. Based on the assumption of longitudinal gradients in velocity, density, and grain-size distribution, the longitudinal density structure of a current may induce a switch, at any given point, from capacity-driven deposition to either (1) bypass and resuspension, (2) bypass with traction, or (3) competence-driven deposition, each resulting in a characteristic upward change in deposit character. The temporal evolution of the flow at a point varies systematically in a streamwise sense. Taking account of these longitudinal variations permits predictions of complex vertical sequences within beds, and of their downstream relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-713
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Sedimentary Research
Volume73
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2003

Keywords

  • STRATIGRAPHIC MODELS
  • SEDIMENT DEPOSITION
  • DEEP-WATER
  • NORTH-SEA
  • CURRENTS
  • STRATIFICATION
  • FACIES
  • FANS
  • TRANSPORT
  • VELOCITY

Cite this

The interpretation of vertical sequences in turbidite beds: the influence of longitudinal flow structure. / Kneller, Benjamin Charles; McCaffrey, W. D.

In: Journal of Sedimentary Research, Vol. 73, No. 5, 09.2003, p. 706-713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kneller, Benjamin Charles ; McCaffrey, W. D. / The interpretation of vertical sequences in turbidite beds: the influence of longitudinal flow structure. In: Journal of Sedimentary Research. 2003 ; Vol. 73, No. 5. pp. 706-713.
@article{ceffca4da1674e5b8921830ddfce1644,
title = "The interpretation of vertical sequences in turbidite beds: the influence of longitudinal flow structure",
abstract = "Because turbidite beds aggrade progressively beneath a moving current, the vertical grain-size profile of a bed is generally an indication of the longitudinal velocity structure of the flow, and longitudinal gradients in suspended sediment concentration ({"}density{"}). A current is more likely to show a simple waning flow history farther from its source; this is because faster-moving parts of the flow overtake slower moving parts, and the flow organizes itself over time so that the fastest parts are at the front. Thus distal (e.g., basin plain) turbidites commonly show simple, normally graded profiles, whereas more proximal turbidites often show complex vertical sequences within a bed, related to unsteadiness. A turbidity current may deposit a structureless, poorly sorted bed where the capacity of the current is exceeded, i.e., where there is insufficient turbulent kinetic energy to maintain the entire suspended mass. Capacity-driven deposition may occur where the flow decelerates. Where flow nonuniformity is the cause of capacity-driven deposition, a massive interval will form the lowest part of the bed, and will have a flat base. Where flow unsteadiness is the cause, a normally graded massive interval may overlie erosional features or traction structures at the base of the bed. Based on the assumption of longitudinal gradients in velocity, density, and grain-size distribution, the longitudinal density structure of a current may induce a switch, at any given point, from capacity-driven deposition to either (1) bypass and resuspension, (2) bypass with traction, or (3) competence-driven deposition, each resulting in a characteristic upward change in deposit character. The temporal evolution of the flow at a point varies systematically in a streamwise sense. Taking account of these longitudinal variations permits predictions of complex vertical sequences within beds, and of their downstream relations.",
keywords = "STRATIGRAPHIC MODELS, SEDIMENT DEPOSITION, DEEP-WATER, NORTH-SEA, CURRENTS, STRATIFICATION, FACIES, FANS, TRANSPORT, VELOCITY",
author = "Kneller, {Benjamin Charles} and McCaffrey, {W. D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1306/031103730706",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "706--713",
journal = "Journal of Sedimentary Research",
issn = "1527-1404",
publisher = "SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interpretation of vertical sequences in turbidite beds: the influence of longitudinal flow structure

AU - Kneller, Benjamin Charles

AU - McCaffrey, W. D.

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - Because turbidite beds aggrade progressively beneath a moving current, the vertical grain-size profile of a bed is generally an indication of the longitudinal velocity structure of the flow, and longitudinal gradients in suspended sediment concentration ("density"). A current is more likely to show a simple waning flow history farther from its source; this is because faster-moving parts of the flow overtake slower moving parts, and the flow organizes itself over time so that the fastest parts are at the front. Thus distal (e.g., basin plain) turbidites commonly show simple, normally graded profiles, whereas more proximal turbidites often show complex vertical sequences within a bed, related to unsteadiness. A turbidity current may deposit a structureless, poorly sorted bed where the capacity of the current is exceeded, i.e., where there is insufficient turbulent kinetic energy to maintain the entire suspended mass. Capacity-driven deposition may occur where the flow decelerates. Where flow nonuniformity is the cause of capacity-driven deposition, a massive interval will form the lowest part of the bed, and will have a flat base. Where flow unsteadiness is the cause, a normally graded massive interval may overlie erosional features or traction structures at the base of the bed. Based on the assumption of longitudinal gradients in velocity, density, and grain-size distribution, the longitudinal density structure of a current may induce a switch, at any given point, from capacity-driven deposition to either (1) bypass and resuspension, (2) bypass with traction, or (3) competence-driven deposition, each resulting in a characteristic upward change in deposit character. The temporal evolution of the flow at a point varies systematically in a streamwise sense. Taking account of these longitudinal variations permits predictions of complex vertical sequences within beds, and of their downstream relations.

AB - Because turbidite beds aggrade progressively beneath a moving current, the vertical grain-size profile of a bed is generally an indication of the longitudinal velocity structure of the flow, and longitudinal gradients in suspended sediment concentration ("density"). A current is more likely to show a simple waning flow history farther from its source; this is because faster-moving parts of the flow overtake slower moving parts, and the flow organizes itself over time so that the fastest parts are at the front. Thus distal (e.g., basin plain) turbidites commonly show simple, normally graded profiles, whereas more proximal turbidites often show complex vertical sequences within a bed, related to unsteadiness. A turbidity current may deposit a structureless, poorly sorted bed where the capacity of the current is exceeded, i.e., where there is insufficient turbulent kinetic energy to maintain the entire suspended mass. Capacity-driven deposition may occur where the flow decelerates. Where flow nonuniformity is the cause of capacity-driven deposition, a massive interval will form the lowest part of the bed, and will have a flat base. Where flow unsteadiness is the cause, a normally graded massive interval may overlie erosional features or traction structures at the base of the bed. Based on the assumption of longitudinal gradients in velocity, density, and grain-size distribution, the longitudinal density structure of a current may induce a switch, at any given point, from capacity-driven deposition to either (1) bypass and resuspension, (2) bypass with traction, or (3) competence-driven deposition, each resulting in a characteristic upward change in deposit character. The temporal evolution of the flow at a point varies systematically in a streamwise sense. Taking account of these longitudinal variations permits predictions of complex vertical sequences within beds, and of their downstream relations.

KW - STRATIGRAPHIC MODELS

KW - SEDIMENT DEPOSITION

KW - DEEP-WATER

KW - NORTH-SEA

KW - CURRENTS

KW - STRATIFICATION

KW - FACIES

KW - FANS

KW - TRANSPORT

KW - VELOCITY

U2 - 10.1306/031103730706

DO - 10.1306/031103730706

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 706

EP - 713

JO - Journal of Sedimentary Research

JF - Journal of Sedimentary Research

SN - 1527-1404

IS - 5

ER -