The issue of normativity and the methodological implications of interpretivism II

the distinctive normativity of law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article is the second part of an analysis that seeks to clarify the distinctive normativity of law, as it is reflected in the legal systems of constitutional democracies. It explores the ability of interpretive theories to capture the conceptual characteristics of the normativity of law. The article argues that it is its institutional character that makes the normativity of law distinctive. The normativity of law must be construed as a form of institutional normativity. The analysis of the institutional character of legal norms revolves around the idea of obligations. It implies that the distinctive normativity of law builds on normative guidance by authoritative institutions. The ability of the law to provide normative guidance is explained in terms of three types of reasons: moral reasons, compliance reasons and response reasons. An implication of this insight is that moral legitimacy is constitutive of the normativity of law. The article concludes with an exploration of the dimensions of moral legitimacy in law, and the way the interplay of the justificatory background to normative claims and the institutional features of law make false normativity in law possible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-218
Number of pages12
JournalActa Juridica Hungarica
Volume54
Issue number3
Early online date20 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

normativity
Law
legitimacy
legal norm
ability
legal system
obligation
democracy

Keywords

  • interpretivism
  • normative guidance
  • authority
  • institutional normativity
  • moral legitimacy
  • false normativity

Cite this

@article{a28605e9f2bf4de387cd131e8489db58,
title = "The issue of normativity and the methodological implications of interpretivism II: the distinctive normativity of law",
abstract = "The article is the second part of an analysis that seeks to clarify the distinctive normativity of law, as it is reflected in the legal systems of constitutional democracies. It explores the ability of interpretive theories to capture the conceptual characteristics of the normativity of law. The article argues that it is its institutional character that makes the normativity of law distinctive. The normativity of law must be construed as a form of institutional normativity. The analysis of the institutional character of legal norms revolves around the idea of obligations. It implies that the distinctive normativity of law builds on normative guidance by authoritative institutions. The ability of the law to provide normative guidance is explained in terms of three types of reasons: moral reasons, compliance reasons and response reasons. An implication of this insight is that moral legitimacy is constitutive of the normativity of law. The article concludes with an exploration of the dimensions of moral legitimacy in law, and the way the interplay of the justificatory background to normative claims and the institutional features of law make false normativity in law possible.",
keywords = "interpretivism , normative guidance , authority , institutional normativity, moral legitimacy, false normativity",
author = "Matyas Bodig",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1556/AJur.54.2013.3.1",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "207--218",
journal = "Acta Juridica Hungarica",
issn = "1216-2574",
publisher = "Akademiai Kiado",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The issue of normativity and the methodological implications of interpretivism II

T2 - the distinctive normativity of law

AU - Bodig, Matyas

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The article is the second part of an analysis that seeks to clarify the distinctive normativity of law, as it is reflected in the legal systems of constitutional democracies. It explores the ability of interpretive theories to capture the conceptual characteristics of the normativity of law. The article argues that it is its institutional character that makes the normativity of law distinctive. The normativity of law must be construed as a form of institutional normativity. The analysis of the institutional character of legal norms revolves around the idea of obligations. It implies that the distinctive normativity of law builds on normative guidance by authoritative institutions. The ability of the law to provide normative guidance is explained in terms of three types of reasons: moral reasons, compliance reasons and response reasons. An implication of this insight is that moral legitimacy is constitutive of the normativity of law. The article concludes with an exploration of the dimensions of moral legitimacy in law, and the way the interplay of the justificatory background to normative claims and the institutional features of law make false normativity in law possible.

AB - The article is the second part of an analysis that seeks to clarify the distinctive normativity of law, as it is reflected in the legal systems of constitutional democracies. It explores the ability of interpretive theories to capture the conceptual characteristics of the normativity of law. The article argues that it is its institutional character that makes the normativity of law distinctive. The normativity of law must be construed as a form of institutional normativity. The analysis of the institutional character of legal norms revolves around the idea of obligations. It implies that the distinctive normativity of law builds on normative guidance by authoritative institutions. The ability of the law to provide normative guidance is explained in terms of three types of reasons: moral reasons, compliance reasons and response reasons. An implication of this insight is that moral legitimacy is constitutive of the normativity of law. The article concludes with an exploration of the dimensions of moral legitimacy in law, and the way the interplay of the justificatory background to normative claims and the institutional features of law make false normativity in law possible.

KW - interpretivism

KW - normative guidance

KW - authority

KW - institutional normativity

KW - moral legitimacy

KW - false normativity

U2 - 10.1556/AJur.54.2013.3.1

DO - 10.1556/AJur.54.2013.3.1

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 207

EP - 218

JO - Acta Juridica Hungarica

JF - Acta Juridica Hungarica

SN - 1216-2574

IS - 3

ER -