The legitimacy of the European human rights regime

a view from the United Kingdom

Tamás Győrfi (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is threefold. First, my ambition is to improve the analytical framework that is used to assess the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s authority can neither be established nor refuted by a single master-argument. Instead, what we need is a careful balancing exercise and this piece aims to set out the main elements of the justificatory equation. Second, using this framework, I intend to put forward the outline of a coherent critique of the European human rights regime. Third, I hope that my paper is able to shed light on why it is natural to expect more vocal criticism from the United Kingdom than from most other member states of the Council of Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-156
Number of pages34
JournalGlobal Constitutionalism
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date7 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

legitimacy
human rights
Council of Europe
criticism

Keywords

  • European Court of Human Rights
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • legitimacy
  • margin of appreciation
  • subsidiarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The legitimacy of the European human rights regime : a view from the United Kingdom. / Győrfi, Tamás (Corresponding Author).

In: Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 8, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 123-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef8cce6d35e54562bebd113a1ac7493c,
title = "The legitimacy of the European human rights regime: a view from the United Kingdom",
abstract = "The purpose of the present paper is threefold. First, my ambition is to improve the analytical framework that is used to assess the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s authority can neither be established nor refuted by a single master-argument. Instead, what we need is a careful balancing exercise and this piece aims to set out the main elements of the justificatory equation. Second, using this framework, I intend to put forward the outline of a coherent critique of the European human rights regime. Third, I hope that my paper is able to shed light on why it is natural to expect more vocal criticism from the United Kingdom than from most other member states of the Council of Europe.",
keywords = "European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, legitimacy, margin of appreciation, subsidiarity",
author = "Tam{\'a}s Győrfi",
note = "The author would like to thank Paul Beaumont, Richard Bellamy, M{\'a}ty{\'a}s B{\'o}dig, Andreas F{\o}llesdal, G{\'a}bor Halmai, Andr{\'a}s Jakab and Zsolt K{\"o}rtv{\'e}lyesi for valuable comments, discussions and suggestions.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S2045381718000333",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "123--156",
journal = "Global Constitutionalism",
issn = "2045-3817",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The legitimacy of the European human rights regime

T2 - a view from the United Kingdom

AU - Győrfi, Tamás

N1 - The author would like to thank Paul Beaumont, Richard Bellamy, Mátyás Bódig, Andreas Føllesdal, Gábor Halmai, András Jakab and Zsolt Körtvélyesi for valuable comments, discussions and suggestions.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - The purpose of the present paper is threefold. First, my ambition is to improve the analytical framework that is used to assess the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s authority can neither be established nor refuted by a single master-argument. Instead, what we need is a careful balancing exercise and this piece aims to set out the main elements of the justificatory equation. Second, using this framework, I intend to put forward the outline of a coherent critique of the European human rights regime. Third, I hope that my paper is able to shed light on why it is natural to expect more vocal criticism from the United Kingdom than from most other member states of the Council of Europe.

AB - The purpose of the present paper is threefold. First, my ambition is to improve the analytical framework that is used to assess the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s authority can neither be established nor refuted by a single master-argument. Instead, what we need is a careful balancing exercise and this piece aims to set out the main elements of the justificatory equation. Second, using this framework, I intend to put forward the outline of a coherent critique of the European human rights regime. Third, I hope that my paper is able to shed light on why it is natural to expect more vocal criticism from the United Kingdom than from most other member states of the Council of Europe.

KW - European Court of Human Rights

KW - Human Rights Act 1998

KW - legitimacy

KW - margin of appreciation

KW - subsidiarity

UR - http://ShowEdit http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062645849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/legitimacy-european-human-rights-regime-view-united-kingdom

UR - https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/en/researchoutput/the-legitimacy-of-the-european-human-rights-regime(ef8cce6d-35e5-4562-bebd-113a1ac7493c).html

U2 - 10.1017/S2045381718000333

DO - 10.1017/S2045381718000333

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 123

EP - 156

JO - Global Constitutionalism

JF - Global Constitutionalism

SN - 2045-3817

IS - 1

ER -