The living & breathing study: a study of patients' views of asthma and its treatment

John Haughney, Greta Barnes, Martyn Partridge, Jennifer Cleland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim:
To evaluate patient understanding of their asthma and determine patient preferences regarding the delivery of asthma care and treatment.

Methods:
Adults with asthma receiving treatment for mild to moderate asthma were recruited to a two-part study: a qualitative phase using a semi-structured interview schedule followed by a quantitative phase based on a structured interview schedule. All interviews were undertaken face-to-face.

Setting and subjects:
A random sample of 40 patients with mild to moderate asthma from seven areas of the UK took part in the qualitative phase of the study. In the quantitative phase, 517 patients on treatment for mild to moderate asthma were interviewed in person by market researchers. This population was achieved using a quota sampling approach that also achieved a representative demographic profile. Initial contact was made in door-to-door calls. Interview took place in 64 locations across the UK.

Results:
Ninety-one percent (n = 468) of respondents felt their asthma was under control, yet two-thirds (n = 339) experienced symptoms at least 2—3 times a week. Only 24% (n = 123) felt their asthma could improve over time, and 71% (n = 366) received no advice from healthcare professionals on how their asthma might change in the future. Fourteen percent (n = 74) of respondents had no ongoing contact with any healthcare professional regarding their asthma. Fifty-eight percent (n = 301) were very satisfied with their asthma care, but this dropped to 33% (n = 173) when respondents were shown asthma guidelines regarding what to expect from treatment. Sixty-two percent (n = 318) of respondents said their asthma varied at different times of the day, and 86% (n = 444) stated that their asthma varied at different times of the year. Eighty percent (n = 414) of respondents had never been provided with a written, personal asthma action plan recommending changes patients could make themselves to prescribed treatment according to symptom severity, though 68% (n = 353) said they would feel comfortable following sucha plan.

Conclusions:
Most patients have low expectations of what can be achieved by asthma management and do not realise their condition can be improved. Many are resigned to the effects of poor asthma control until made aware that guidelines indicate this can be better. Given that many are receptive to the notion of written, personal asthma action plans, the implementation of these, supported by appropriate education, could help patients achieve improved asthma control.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-35
Number of pages8
JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Respiration
Asthma
Therapeutics
Interviews
Appointments and Schedules
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Preference

Cite this

The living & breathing study : a study of patients' views of asthma and its treatment. / Haughney, John; Barnes, Greta; Partridge, Martyn; Cleland, Jennifer.

In: Primary Care Respiratory Journal, Vol. 13, 01.03.2004, p. 28-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b96cc88d79544c99b8c262e69d96075,
title = "The living & breathing study: a study of patients' views of asthma and its treatment",
abstract = "Aim:To evaluate patient understanding of their asthma and determine patient preferences regarding the delivery of asthma care and treatment.Methods:Adults with asthma receiving treatment for mild to moderate asthma were recruited to a two-part study: a qualitative phase using a semi-structured interview schedule followed by a quantitative phase based on a structured interview schedule. All interviews were undertaken face-to-face.Setting and subjects:A random sample of 40 patients with mild to moderate asthma from seven areas of the UK took part in the qualitative phase of the study. In the quantitative phase, 517 patients on treatment for mild to moderate asthma were interviewed in person by market researchers. This population was achieved using a quota sampling approach that also achieved a representative demographic profile. Initial contact was made in door-to-door calls. Interview took place in 64 locations across the UK.Results:Ninety-one percent (n = 468) of respondents felt their asthma was under control, yet two-thirds (n = 339) experienced symptoms at least 2—3 times a week. Only 24{\%} (n = 123) felt their asthma could improve over time, and 71{\%} (n = 366) received no advice from healthcare professionals on how their asthma might change in the future. Fourteen percent (n = 74) of respondents had no ongoing contact with any healthcare professional regarding their asthma. Fifty-eight percent (n = 301) were very satisfied with their asthma care, but this dropped to 33{\%} (n = 173) when respondents were shown asthma guidelines regarding what to expect from treatment. Sixty-two percent (n = 318) of respondents said their asthma varied at different times of the day, and 86{\%} (n = 444) stated that their asthma varied at different times of the year. Eighty percent (n = 414) of respondents had never been provided with a written, personal asthma action plan recommending changes patients could make themselves to prescribed treatment according to symptom severity, though 68{\%} (n = 353) said they would feel comfortable following sucha plan.Conclusions:Most patients have low expectations of what can be achieved by asthma management and do not realise their condition can be improved. Many are resigned to the effects of poor asthma control until made aware that guidelines indicate this can be better. Given that many are receptive to the notion of written, personal asthma action plans, the implementation of these, supported by appropriate education, could help patients achieve improved asthma control.",
author = "John Haughney and Greta Barnes and Martyn Partridge and Jennifer Cleland",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.007",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "28--35",
journal = "Primary Care Respiratory Journal",
issn = "1475-1534",
publisher = "Primary Care Respiratory Society UK",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The living & breathing study

T2 - a study of patients' views of asthma and its treatment

AU - Haughney, John

AU - Barnes, Greta

AU - Partridge, Martyn

AU - Cleland, Jennifer

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - Aim:To evaluate patient understanding of their asthma and determine patient preferences regarding the delivery of asthma care and treatment.Methods:Adults with asthma receiving treatment for mild to moderate asthma were recruited to a two-part study: a qualitative phase using a semi-structured interview schedule followed by a quantitative phase based on a structured interview schedule. All interviews were undertaken face-to-face.Setting and subjects:A random sample of 40 patients with mild to moderate asthma from seven areas of the UK took part in the qualitative phase of the study. In the quantitative phase, 517 patients on treatment for mild to moderate asthma were interviewed in person by market researchers. This population was achieved using a quota sampling approach that also achieved a representative demographic profile. Initial contact was made in door-to-door calls. Interview took place in 64 locations across the UK.Results:Ninety-one percent (n = 468) of respondents felt their asthma was under control, yet two-thirds (n = 339) experienced symptoms at least 2—3 times a week. Only 24% (n = 123) felt their asthma could improve over time, and 71% (n = 366) received no advice from healthcare professionals on how their asthma might change in the future. Fourteen percent (n = 74) of respondents had no ongoing contact with any healthcare professional regarding their asthma. Fifty-eight percent (n = 301) were very satisfied with their asthma care, but this dropped to 33% (n = 173) when respondents were shown asthma guidelines regarding what to expect from treatment. Sixty-two percent (n = 318) of respondents said their asthma varied at different times of the day, and 86% (n = 444) stated that their asthma varied at different times of the year. Eighty percent (n = 414) of respondents had never been provided with a written, personal asthma action plan recommending changes patients could make themselves to prescribed treatment according to symptom severity, though 68% (n = 353) said they would feel comfortable following sucha plan.Conclusions:Most patients have low expectations of what can be achieved by asthma management and do not realise their condition can be improved. Many are resigned to the effects of poor asthma control until made aware that guidelines indicate this can be better. Given that many are receptive to the notion of written, personal asthma action plans, the implementation of these, supported by appropriate education, could help patients achieve improved asthma control.

AB - Aim:To evaluate patient understanding of their asthma and determine patient preferences regarding the delivery of asthma care and treatment.Methods:Adults with asthma receiving treatment for mild to moderate asthma were recruited to a two-part study: a qualitative phase using a semi-structured interview schedule followed by a quantitative phase based on a structured interview schedule. All interviews were undertaken face-to-face.Setting and subjects:A random sample of 40 patients with mild to moderate asthma from seven areas of the UK took part in the qualitative phase of the study. In the quantitative phase, 517 patients on treatment for mild to moderate asthma were interviewed in person by market researchers. This population was achieved using a quota sampling approach that also achieved a representative demographic profile. Initial contact was made in door-to-door calls. Interview took place in 64 locations across the UK.Results:Ninety-one percent (n = 468) of respondents felt their asthma was under control, yet two-thirds (n = 339) experienced symptoms at least 2—3 times a week. Only 24% (n = 123) felt their asthma could improve over time, and 71% (n = 366) received no advice from healthcare professionals on how their asthma might change in the future. Fourteen percent (n = 74) of respondents had no ongoing contact with any healthcare professional regarding their asthma. Fifty-eight percent (n = 301) were very satisfied with their asthma care, but this dropped to 33% (n = 173) when respondents were shown asthma guidelines regarding what to expect from treatment. Sixty-two percent (n = 318) of respondents said their asthma varied at different times of the day, and 86% (n = 444) stated that their asthma varied at different times of the year. Eighty percent (n = 414) of respondents had never been provided with a written, personal asthma action plan recommending changes patients could make themselves to prescribed treatment according to symptom severity, though 68% (n = 353) said they would feel comfortable following sucha plan.Conclusions:Most patients have low expectations of what can be achieved by asthma management and do not realise their condition can be improved. Many are resigned to the effects of poor asthma control until made aware that guidelines indicate this can be better. Given that many are receptive to the notion of written, personal asthma action plans, the implementation of these, supported by appropriate education, could help patients achieve improved asthma control.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.007

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 28

EP - 35

JO - Primary Care Respiratory Journal

JF - Primary Care Respiratory Journal

SN - 1475-1534

ER -