The neural mechanisms of reciprocal communication

E Nagy, M. Liotti, S Brown, G D Waiter, A Bromiley, Ceri Tamsin Trevethan, G Bardos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Imitation in humans has been attributed to increased activation of the mirror neuron system, but there is no neural model to explain reciprocal communication. In this study, we investigated whether reciprocal, communicative, imitative exchanges activate the same neural system as imitation of simple movements, and whether the neural network subserving communication is lateralized. Fifteen participants were tested using functional magnetic resonance imaging with an online interactive-imitative paradigm while they performed finger movements for three different purposes: (1) to imitate the experimenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experimenter, and (3) to simply perform the movement. Subtraction analysis (imitation > movement, initiation > movement) revealed the activation of a strongly lateralized network, where the infra-parietal lobule (IPL) activation was lateralized to the left, while the infero-frontal gyrus (IFG) activation was to the right. It is concluded that imitation in a communicative paradigm recruits a lateralized network, with left fronto- and right parietal activation, that overlaps with a network that subserves understanding of an Other's intentions in relation to the Self. This finding lends plausibility to the suggestion that the neural network for imitation evolved to support interpersonal
communication.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-167
Number of pages10
JournalBrain Research
Volume1353
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Communication
Mirror Neurons
Parietal Lobe
Ego
Fingers
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • mirror neuron system
  • imitation
  • reciprocal communication
  • infra-parietal lobule
  • infero-frontal gyrus
  • functina magnetic resonance
  • imaging

Cite this

The neural mechanisms of reciprocal communication. / Nagy, E; Liotti, M.; Brown, S; Waiter, G D; Bromiley, A; Trevethan, Ceri Tamsin; Bardos, G.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 1353, 24.09.2010, p. 159-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagy, E ; Liotti, M. ; Brown, S ; Waiter, G D ; Bromiley, A ; Trevethan, Ceri Tamsin ; Bardos, G. / The neural mechanisms of reciprocal communication. In: Brain Research. 2010 ; Vol. 1353. pp. 159-167.
@article{a2d4c036c2cb424d962f14c1dc7ce0ef,
title = "The neural mechanisms of reciprocal communication",
abstract = "Imitation in humans has been attributed to increased activation of the mirror neuron system, but there is no neural model to explain reciprocal communication. In this study, we investigated whether reciprocal, communicative, imitative exchanges activate the same neural system as imitation of simple movements, and whether the neural network subserving communication is lateralized. Fifteen participants were tested using functional magnetic resonance imaging with an online interactive-imitative paradigm while they performed finger movements for three different purposes: (1) to imitate the experimenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experimenter, and (3) to simply perform the movement. Subtraction analysis (imitation > movement, initiation > movement) revealed the activation of a strongly lateralized network, where the infra-parietal lobule (IPL) activation was lateralized to the left, while the infero-frontal gyrus (IFG) activation was to the right. It is concluded that imitation in a communicative paradigm recruits a lateralized network, with left fronto- and right parietal activation, that overlaps with a network that subserves understanding of an Other's intentions in relation to the Self. This finding lends plausibility to the suggestion that the neural network for imitation evolved to support interpersonalcommunication.",
keywords = "mirror neuron system, imitation, reciprocal communication, infra-parietal lobule, infero-frontal gyrus, functina magnetic resonance, imaging",
author = "E Nagy and M. Liotti and S Brown and Waiter, {G D} and A Bromiley and Trevethan, {Ceri Tamsin} and G Bardos",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.066",
language = "English",
volume = "1353",
pages = "159--167",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The neural mechanisms of reciprocal communication

AU - Nagy, E

AU - Liotti, M.

AU - Brown, S

AU - Waiter, G D

AU - Bromiley, A

AU - Trevethan, Ceri Tamsin

AU - Bardos, G

PY - 2010/9/24

Y1 - 2010/9/24

N2 - Imitation in humans has been attributed to increased activation of the mirror neuron system, but there is no neural model to explain reciprocal communication. In this study, we investigated whether reciprocal, communicative, imitative exchanges activate the same neural system as imitation of simple movements, and whether the neural network subserving communication is lateralized. Fifteen participants were tested using functional magnetic resonance imaging with an online interactive-imitative paradigm while they performed finger movements for three different purposes: (1) to imitate the experimenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experimenter, and (3) to simply perform the movement. Subtraction analysis (imitation > movement, initiation > movement) revealed the activation of a strongly lateralized network, where the infra-parietal lobule (IPL) activation was lateralized to the left, while the infero-frontal gyrus (IFG) activation was to the right. It is concluded that imitation in a communicative paradigm recruits a lateralized network, with left fronto- and right parietal activation, that overlaps with a network that subserves understanding of an Other's intentions in relation to the Self. This finding lends plausibility to the suggestion that the neural network for imitation evolved to support interpersonalcommunication.

AB - Imitation in humans has been attributed to increased activation of the mirror neuron system, but there is no neural model to explain reciprocal communication. In this study, we investigated whether reciprocal, communicative, imitative exchanges activate the same neural system as imitation of simple movements, and whether the neural network subserving communication is lateralized. Fifteen participants were tested using functional magnetic resonance imaging with an online interactive-imitative paradigm while they performed finger movements for three different purposes: (1) to imitate the experimenter, (2) to elicit an imitation from the experimenter, and (3) to simply perform the movement. Subtraction analysis (imitation > movement, initiation > movement) revealed the activation of a strongly lateralized network, where the infra-parietal lobule (IPL) activation was lateralized to the left, while the infero-frontal gyrus (IFG) activation was to the right. It is concluded that imitation in a communicative paradigm recruits a lateralized network, with left fronto- and right parietal activation, that overlaps with a network that subserves understanding of an Other's intentions in relation to the Self. This finding lends plausibility to the suggestion that the neural network for imitation evolved to support interpersonalcommunication.

KW - mirror neuron system

KW - imitation

KW - reciprocal communication

KW - infra-parietal lobule

KW - infero-frontal gyrus

KW - functina magnetic resonance

KW - imaging

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.066

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.066

M3 - Article

VL - 1353

SP - 159

EP - 167

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

ER -