The new injury severity score: better prediction of functionalrecovery after orthopaedic injury

Alasdair George Sutherland, Andrew Thomas Johnston, James Douglas Hutchison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Injury Severity Score (ISS) is the most widely used method of assessing severity of injury in blunt trauma. It has been recognized that, by only allowing the score to consider the worst injury for each body system, ISS underestimates the problems of multiple musculoskeletal injuries. The New ISS (NISS) allows the three most severe injuries to be scored, irrespective of region affected, and may give better prediction of functional recovery in these patients.
A prospective cohort study of 200 patients with musculoskeletal injuries, examining the predictive value of ISS and NISS on functional recovery as measured by patient-derived outcome measures (Short Form-36, Sickness Impact Profile, and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment).
NISS was greater than ISS in 34 patients (17%). NISS showed closer correlation with total scores and subscores of the outcomes measures than did ISS (Spearman's rho ranked test, P < 0.05).
NISS, a simple modification from ISS, better predicts functional outcomes in survivors of musculoskeletal trauma, and offers an improvement in the assessment of effectiveness of trauma care delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-27
Number of pages4
JournalValue in Health
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date18 Jan 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jan 2006

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • adult
  • aged
  • female
  • humans
  • injury severity score
  • male
  • middle aged
  • musculoskeletal diseases
  • musculoskeletal system
  • orthopedics
  • pilot projects
  • predictive value of tests
  • prospective studies
  • recovery of function
  • trauma centers
  • treatment outcome
  • nonpenetrating wounds
  • injury
  • assessment instrument
  • sickness impact profile
  • health-status measure
  • care-unit admission

Cite this

The new injury severity score : better prediction of functionalrecovery after orthopaedic injury. / Sutherland, Alasdair George; Johnston, Andrew Thomas; Hutchison, James Douglas.

In: Value in Health, Vol. 9, No. 1, 27.01.2006, p. 24-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sutherland, Alasdair George ; Johnston, Andrew Thomas ; Hutchison, James Douglas. / The new injury severity score : better prediction of functionalrecovery after orthopaedic injury. In: Value in Health. 2006 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 24-27.
@article{54f21954811e4f7c9c2c3f278923c5c5,
title = "The new injury severity score: better prediction of functionalrecovery after orthopaedic injury",
abstract = "Injury Severity Score (ISS) is the most widely used method of assessing severity of injury in blunt trauma. It has been recognized that, by only allowing the score to consider the worst injury for each body system, ISS underestimates the problems of multiple musculoskeletal injuries. The New ISS (NISS) allows the three most severe injuries to be scored, irrespective of region affected, and may give better prediction of functional recovery in these patients. A prospective cohort study of 200 patients with musculoskeletal injuries, examining the predictive value of ISS and NISS on functional recovery as measured by patient-derived outcome measures (Short Form-36, Sickness Impact Profile, and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment). NISS was greater than ISS in 34 patients (17{\%}). NISS showed closer correlation with total scores and subscores of the outcomes measures than did ISS (Spearman's rho ranked test, P < 0.05). NISS, a simple modification from ISS, better predicts functional outcomes in survivors of musculoskeletal trauma, and offers an improvement in the assessment of effectiveness of trauma care delivery.",
keywords = "adolescent, adult, aged, female, humans, injury severity score, male, middle aged, musculoskeletal diseases, musculoskeletal system, orthopedics, pilot projects, predictive value of tests, prospective studies, recovery of function, trauma centers, treatment outcome, nonpenetrating wounds, injury, assessment instrument, sickness impact profile, health-status measure, care-unit admission",
author = "Sutherland, {Alasdair George} and Johnston, {Andrew Thomas} and Hutchison, {James Douglas}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00077.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "24--27",
journal = "Value in Health",
issn = "1098-3015",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The new injury severity score

T2 - better prediction of functionalrecovery after orthopaedic injury

AU - Sutherland, Alasdair George

AU - Johnston, Andrew Thomas

AU - Hutchison, James Douglas

PY - 2006/1/27

Y1 - 2006/1/27

N2 - Injury Severity Score (ISS) is the most widely used method of assessing severity of injury in blunt trauma. It has been recognized that, by only allowing the score to consider the worst injury for each body system, ISS underestimates the problems of multiple musculoskeletal injuries. The New ISS (NISS) allows the three most severe injuries to be scored, irrespective of region affected, and may give better prediction of functional recovery in these patients. A prospective cohort study of 200 patients with musculoskeletal injuries, examining the predictive value of ISS and NISS on functional recovery as measured by patient-derived outcome measures (Short Form-36, Sickness Impact Profile, and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment). NISS was greater than ISS in 34 patients (17%). NISS showed closer correlation with total scores and subscores of the outcomes measures than did ISS (Spearman's rho ranked test, P < 0.05). NISS, a simple modification from ISS, better predicts functional outcomes in survivors of musculoskeletal trauma, and offers an improvement in the assessment of effectiveness of trauma care delivery.

AB - Injury Severity Score (ISS) is the most widely used method of assessing severity of injury in blunt trauma. It has been recognized that, by only allowing the score to consider the worst injury for each body system, ISS underestimates the problems of multiple musculoskeletal injuries. The New ISS (NISS) allows the three most severe injuries to be scored, irrespective of region affected, and may give better prediction of functional recovery in these patients. A prospective cohort study of 200 patients with musculoskeletal injuries, examining the predictive value of ISS and NISS on functional recovery as measured by patient-derived outcome measures (Short Form-36, Sickness Impact Profile, and Musculoskeletal Function Assessment). NISS was greater than ISS in 34 patients (17%). NISS showed closer correlation with total scores and subscores of the outcomes measures than did ISS (Spearman's rho ranked test, P < 0.05). NISS, a simple modification from ISS, better predicts functional outcomes in survivors of musculoskeletal trauma, and offers an improvement in the assessment of effectiveness of trauma care delivery.

KW - adolescent

KW - adult

KW - aged

KW - female

KW - humans

KW - injury severity score

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - musculoskeletal diseases

KW - musculoskeletal system

KW - orthopedics

KW - pilot projects

KW - predictive value of tests

KW - prospective studies

KW - recovery of function

KW - trauma centers

KW - treatment outcome

KW - nonpenetrating wounds

KW - injury

KW - assessment instrument

KW - sickness impact profile

KW - health-status measure

KW - care-unit admission

U2 - 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00077.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00077.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16441521

VL - 9

SP - 24

EP - 27

JO - Value in Health

JF - Value in Health

SN - 1098-3015

IS - 1

ER -