The Political Costs of Policy Coherence: Constructing a Rural Policy for Scotland

Alexander Grant Jordan, Darren Halpin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is not hard to find the complaint that a group of policies are incoherent, operate in silos or are unintegrated. The aspiration to coherence is widespread across all political systems: it is today's idea in good currency. Scholarship has identified conditions that support coherence: a strong constituency with a shared policy image. This article confirms that these are vital sources of more or less coherence, but explores the question of whether more coherence in one area comes at the cost of incoherence elsewhere.

Case study detail contrasts the Scottish Executive's projection of a unified rural policy, with the reality of a persistent Scottish agricultural sector, with contending (multiple) publics with separate and often conflicting agendas: the case study found no unified policy community with shared perceptions. While a lack of coordination may simply be the manifestation of poor policymaking, this piece argues that in other cases the practical limitations on policy harmonization have to be acknowledged. Imperfectly coordinated rural policy may be inevitable as coordination in particular niches is often a casualty of competing priorities. This article argues against over ambitious expectations about the feasibility of integration. Accordingly it suggests that the project to rid policy practice of incoherence is too heroic: instead this article rediscovers the virtues of bargaining among informed and relevant participants, and incremental politics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-41
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Public Policy
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

rural policy
costs
cost
agricultural sector
harmonization
complaint
currency
political system
bargaining
projection
niche
politics
policy
coherence
lack
community
Group

Cite this

The Political Costs of Policy Coherence : Constructing a Rural Policy for Scotland. / Jordan, Alexander Grant; Halpin, Darren.

In: Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 05.2006, p. 21-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jordan, Alexander Grant ; Halpin, Darren. / The Political Costs of Policy Coherence : Constructing a Rural Policy for Scotland. In: Journal of Public Policy. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 21-41.
@article{503e3d8faa3e4dd0972c8714652e1c3e,
title = "The Political Costs of Policy Coherence: Constructing a Rural Policy for Scotland",
abstract = "It is not hard to find the complaint that a group of policies are incoherent, operate in silos or are unintegrated. The aspiration to coherence is widespread across all political systems: it is today's idea in good currency. Scholarship has identified conditions that support coherence: a strong constituency with a shared policy image. This article confirms that these are vital sources of more or less coherence, but explores the question of whether more coherence in one area comes at the cost of incoherence elsewhere.Case study detail contrasts the Scottish Executive's projection of a unified rural policy, with the reality of a persistent Scottish agricultural sector, with contending (multiple) publics with separate and often conflicting agendas: the case study found no unified policy community with shared perceptions. While a lack of coordination may simply be the manifestation of poor policymaking, this piece argues that in other cases the practical limitations on policy harmonization have to be acknowledged. Imperfectly coordinated rural policy may be inevitable as coordination in particular niches is often a casualty of competing priorities. This article argues against over ambitious expectations about the feasibility of integration. Accordingly it suggests that the project to rid policy practice of incoherence is too heroic: instead this article rediscovers the virtues of bargaining among informed and relevant participants, and incremental politics.",
author = "Jordan, {Alexander Grant} and Darren Halpin",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S0143814X06000456",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "21--41",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy",
issn = "0143-814X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Political Costs of Policy Coherence

T2 - Constructing a Rural Policy for Scotland

AU - Jordan, Alexander Grant

AU - Halpin, Darren

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - It is not hard to find the complaint that a group of policies are incoherent, operate in silos or are unintegrated. The aspiration to coherence is widespread across all political systems: it is today's idea in good currency. Scholarship has identified conditions that support coherence: a strong constituency with a shared policy image. This article confirms that these are vital sources of more or less coherence, but explores the question of whether more coherence in one area comes at the cost of incoherence elsewhere.Case study detail contrasts the Scottish Executive's projection of a unified rural policy, with the reality of a persistent Scottish agricultural sector, with contending (multiple) publics with separate and often conflicting agendas: the case study found no unified policy community with shared perceptions. While a lack of coordination may simply be the manifestation of poor policymaking, this piece argues that in other cases the practical limitations on policy harmonization have to be acknowledged. Imperfectly coordinated rural policy may be inevitable as coordination in particular niches is often a casualty of competing priorities. This article argues against over ambitious expectations about the feasibility of integration. Accordingly it suggests that the project to rid policy practice of incoherence is too heroic: instead this article rediscovers the virtues of bargaining among informed and relevant participants, and incremental politics.

AB - It is not hard to find the complaint that a group of policies are incoherent, operate in silos or are unintegrated. The aspiration to coherence is widespread across all political systems: it is today's idea in good currency. Scholarship has identified conditions that support coherence: a strong constituency with a shared policy image. This article confirms that these are vital sources of more or less coherence, but explores the question of whether more coherence in one area comes at the cost of incoherence elsewhere.Case study detail contrasts the Scottish Executive's projection of a unified rural policy, with the reality of a persistent Scottish agricultural sector, with contending (multiple) publics with separate and often conflicting agendas: the case study found no unified policy community with shared perceptions. While a lack of coordination may simply be the manifestation of poor policymaking, this piece argues that in other cases the practical limitations on policy harmonization have to be acknowledged. Imperfectly coordinated rural policy may be inevitable as coordination in particular niches is often a casualty of competing priorities. This article argues against over ambitious expectations about the feasibility of integration. Accordingly it suggests that the project to rid policy practice of incoherence is too heroic: instead this article rediscovers the virtues of bargaining among informed and relevant participants, and incremental politics.

U2 - 10.1017/S0143814X06000456

DO - 10.1017/S0143814X06000456

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 21

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Public Policy

JF - Journal of Public Policy

SN - 0143-814X

IS - 1

ER -