The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system

Timothy Guy Benton, C. T. Lapsley, A. P. Beckerman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    1. Variation in an organism's environment can influence its life history and therefore its population size. Understanding the interplay between noise and population dynamics is of considerable importance, especially for prescribing management of economically important or threatened species. The impact of noise on population biology has been the subject of frequent theoretical investigations and discussed in posthoc analyses of time-series. However, there is a dearth of experimental investigations.

    2. Here we report results from a replicated laboratory study of soil mites, Sancassania berlesei, kept in controlled environments but with food supplied randomly, with different synchrony and variances, while maintaining the same mean rate.

    3. Increasing environmental variance increases population variance, but decreases mean population size. therefore changing the observed shape of the distribution of population sizes: the shape becomes more skewed with more environmental variance.

    4. The distribution of population sizes are best described by negative binomial or gamma distributions. Log-normal and normal distributions rarely fit and Poisson distributions never fit.

    5. The correlation between populations is sensitive to the correlation in environmental noise but insensitive to its variance.

    6. Different life stages (eggs, juveniles and adults) respond differently to noise. in that there are significant differences in the way that environmental variation changes the mean, variance, shape of distribution and relationship between environmental and population synchrony.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)320-332
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
    Volume71
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • gamma distribution
    • Moran effect
    • negative binomial distribution
    • Sancassania berlesei
    • stochasticity
    • METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS
    • DENSITY
    • NONLINEARITY
    • PERSISTENCE
    • EXTINCTION
    • SYNCHRONY
    • ECOLOGY
    • DISPERSAL
    • MOMENTS
    • MODELS

    Cite this

    The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system. / Benton, Timothy Guy; Lapsley, C. T.; Beckerman, A. P.

    In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 71, 2002, p. 320-332.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Benton, Timothy Guy ; Lapsley, C. T. ; Beckerman, A. P. / The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system. In: Journal of Animal Ecology. 2002 ; Vol. 71. pp. 320-332.
    @article{7e366d0f14df4057a3f90557f03ed494,
    title = "The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system",
    abstract = "1. Variation in an organism's environment can influence its life history and therefore its population size. Understanding the interplay between noise and population dynamics is of considerable importance, especially for prescribing management of economically important or threatened species. The impact of noise on population biology has been the subject of frequent theoretical investigations and discussed in posthoc analyses of time-series. However, there is a dearth of experimental investigations.2. Here we report results from a replicated laboratory study of soil mites, Sancassania berlesei, kept in controlled environments but with food supplied randomly, with different synchrony and variances, while maintaining the same mean rate.3. Increasing environmental variance increases population variance, but decreases mean population size. therefore changing the observed shape of the distribution of population sizes: the shape becomes more skewed with more environmental variance.4. The distribution of population sizes are best described by negative binomial or gamma distributions. Log-normal and normal distributions rarely fit and Poisson distributions never fit.5. The correlation between populations is sensitive to the correlation in environmental noise but insensitive to its variance.6. Different life stages (eggs, juveniles and adults) respond differently to noise. in that there are significant differences in the way that environmental variation changes the mean, variance, shape of distribution and relationship between environmental and population synchrony.",
    keywords = "gamma distribution, Moran effect, negative binomial distribution, Sancassania berlesei, stochasticity, METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS, DENSITY, NONLINEARITY, PERSISTENCE, EXTINCTION, SYNCHRONY, ECOLOGY, DISPERSAL, MOMENTS, MODELS",
    author = "Benton, {Timothy Guy} and Lapsley, {C. T.} and Beckerman, {A. P.}",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00601.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "71",
    pages = "320--332",
    journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
    issn = "0021-8790",
    publisher = "BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system

    AU - Benton, Timothy Guy

    AU - Lapsley, C. T.

    AU - Beckerman, A. P.

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - 1. Variation in an organism's environment can influence its life history and therefore its population size. Understanding the interplay between noise and population dynamics is of considerable importance, especially for prescribing management of economically important or threatened species. The impact of noise on population biology has been the subject of frequent theoretical investigations and discussed in posthoc analyses of time-series. However, there is a dearth of experimental investigations.2. Here we report results from a replicated laboratory study of soil mites, Sancassania berlesei, kept in controlled environments but with food supplied randomly, with different synchrony and variances, while maintaining the same mean rate.3. Increasing environmental variance increases population variance, but decreases mean population size. therefore changing the observed shape of the distribution of population sizes: the shape becomes more skewed with more environmental variance.4. The distribution of population sizes are best described by negative binomial or gamma distributions. Log-normal and normal distributions rarely fit and Poisson distributions never fit.5. The correlation between populations is sensitive to the correlation in environmental noise but insensitive to its variance.6. Different life stages (eggs, juveniles and adults) respond differently to noise. in that there are significant differences in the way that environmental variation changes the mean, variance, shape of distribution and relationship between environmental and population synchrony.

    AB - 1. Variation in an organism's environment can influence its life history and therefore its population size. Understanding the interplay between noise and population dynamics is of considerable importance, especially for prescribing management of economically important or threatened species. The impact of noise on population biology has been the subject of frequent theoretical investigations and discussed in posthoc analyses of time-series. However, there is a dearth of experimental investigations.2. Here we report results from a replicated laboratory study of soil mites, Sancassania berlesei, kept in controlled environments but with food supplied randomly, with different synchrony and variances, while maintaining the same mean rate.3. Increasing environmental variance increases population variance, but decreases mean population size. therefore changing the observed shape of the distribution of population sizes: the shape becomes more skewed with more environmental variance.4. The distribution of population sizes are best described by negative binomial or gamma distributions. Log-normal and normal distributions rarely fit and Poisson distributions never fit.5. The correlation between populations is sensitive to the correlation in environmental noise but insensitive to its variance.6. Different life stages (eggs, juveniles and adults) respond differently to noise. in that there are significant differences in the way that environmental variation changes the mean, variance, shape of distribution and relationship between environmental and population synchrony.

    KW - gamma distribution

    KW - Moran effect

    KW - negative binomial distribution

    KW - Sancassania berlesei

    KW - stochasticity

    KW - METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS

    KW - DENSITY

    KW - NONLINEARITY

    KW - PERSISTENCE

    KW - EXTINCTION

    KW - SYNCHRONY

    KW - ECOLOGY

    KW - DISPERSAL

    KW - MOMENTS

    KW - MODELS

    U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00601.x

    DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00601.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 71

    SP - 320

    EP - 332

    JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

    JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

    SN - 0021-8790

    ER -