TY - JOUR
T1 - The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture
AU - Lamb, Anthony
AU - Green, Rhys
AU - Bateman, Ian
AU - Broadmeadow, Mark
AU - Bruce, Toby
AU - Burney, Jennifer
AU - Carey, Pete
AU - Chadwick, David
AU - Crane, Ellie
AU - Field, Rob
AU - Goulding, Keith
AU - Griffiths, Howard
AU - Hastings, Astley
AU - Kasoar, Tim
AU - Kindred, Daniel
AU - Phalan, Ben
AU - Pickett, John
AU - Smith, Pete
AU - Wall, Eileen
AU - zu Ermgassen , Erasmus K. H. J.
AU - Balmford, Andrew
N1 - This research was funded by the Cambridge Conservation Initiative Collaborative Fund for Conservation, and we thank its major sponsor Arcadia. We thank J. Bruinsma for the provision of demand data, the CEH for the provision of soil data and J. Spencer for invaluable discussions. A.L. was supported by a Gates Cambridge Scholarship. T.B., K.G. and J.P. acknowledge BBSRC funding through grant BBS/E/C/00005198.
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Greenhouse gas emissions from global agriculture are increasing at around 1% per annum, yet substantial cuts in emissions are needed across all sectors1. The challenge of reducing agricultural emissions is particularly acute, because the reductions achievable by changing farming practices are limited2, 3 and are hampered by rapidly rising food demand4, 5. Here we assess the technical mitigation potential offered by land sparing—increasing agricultural yields, reducing farmland area and actively restoring natural habitats on the land spared6. Restored habitats can sequester carbon and can offset emissions from agriculture. Using the UK as an example, we estimate net emissions in 2050 under a range of future agricultural scenarios. We find that a land-sparing strategy has the technical potential to achieve significant reductions in net emissions from agriculture and land-use change. Coupling land sparing with demand-side strategies to reduce meat consumption and food waste can further increase the technical mitigation potential—however, economic and implementation considerations might limit the degree to which this technical potential could be realized in practice.
AB - Greenhouse gas emissions from global agriculture are increasing at around 1% per annum, yet substantial cuts in emissions are needed across all sectors1. The challenge of reducing agricultural emissions is particularly acute, because the reductions achievable by changing farming practices are limited2, 3 and are hampered by rapidly rising food demand4, 5. Here we assess the technical mitigation potential offered by land sparing—increasing agricultural yields, reducing farmland area and actively restoring natural habitats on the land spared6. Restored habitats can sequester carbon and can offset emissions from agriculture. Using the UK as an example, we estimate net emissions in 2050 under a range of future agricultural scenarios. We find that a land-sparing strategy has the technical potential to achieve significant reductions in net emissions from agriculture and land-use change. Coupling land sparing with demand-side strategies to reduce meat consumption and food waste can further increase the technical mitigation potential—however, economic and implementation considerations might limit the degree to which this technical potential could be realized in practice.
U2 - 10.1038/nclimate2910
DO - 10.1038/nclimate2910
M3 - Letter
VL - 6
SP - 488
EP - 492
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
SN - 1758-678X
ER -