The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This review is an attempt to assess the current 'state-of-the-art' for techniques of subsurface fluvial stratigraphic analysis. It begins with a brief overview of the requirements of subsurface analysis, the limitations of the data available, and the difficulties presented by fluvial deposits in this context, then moves onto an examination of the philosophy behind modelling and the approaches that can be taken. Models are idealized representations of reality established to assist the understanding of complex natural phenomena and processes; they should be designed to have both descriptive and interpretative value. In addition, and of particular value in the exploitation of economic resources, models should also have predictive power in that they should enable deductions to be made about the properties at locations for which measurements have not been taken.A wide range of alternative approaches are currently employed. These include: conceptual techniques like facies modelling and sequence stratigraphic analysis; direct numerical modelling from observations including methods such as palaeohydrology, surface (interpolation) methods, geostatistics and fractals; simulation methods such as using Markov statistics and deterministic process studies; and indirect numerical modelling such as probabilistic simulation, and the use of outcrop analogues. Each of the techniques is briefly described, and its strengths and weaknesses analysed. Subsurface prediction typically incorporates a combination of modelling philosophies in hybrid methodologies, such as a combination of forward process models based on parameters obtained from initial, inverse modelling of the data. This is probably the way forward, such as combining stochastic with process-based simulations.The validity of subsurface models depends directly on the quality of the data and the assumptions made. Current modelling approaches are fundamentally limited because of our lack of adequately detailed knowledge about present-day rivers systems
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy
EditorsPaul Carling, Martin Dawson
Place of PublicationChichester, UK
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
Pages395-508
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)047195330X, 978-0471953302
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 1996

Fingerprint

stratigraphy
prediction
modeling
simulation
paleohydrology
geostatistics
fluvial deposit
river system
interpolation
outcrop
methodology
resource
economics
analysis
method

Cite this

North, C. P. (1996). The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy. In P. Carling, & M. Dawson (Eds.), Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy (pp. 395-508). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy. / North, Colin P.

Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy. ed. / Paul Carling; Martin Dawson. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons, 1996. p. 395-508.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

North, CP 1996, The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy. in P Carling & M Dawson (eds), Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 395-508.
North CP. The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy. In Carling P, Dawson M, editors, Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 1996. p. 395-508
North, Colin P. / The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy. Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy. editor / Paul Carling ; Martin Dawson. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons, 1996. pp. 395-508
@inbook{d16eaf05f4e043a2b1624756f28d6fc9,
title = "The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy",
abstract = "This review is an attempt to assess the current 'state-of-the-art' for techniques of subsurface fluvial stratigraphic analysis. It begins with a brief overview of the requirements of subsurface analysis, the limitations of the data available, and the difficulties presented by fluvial deposits in this context, then moves onto an examination of the philosophy behind modelling and the approaches that can be taken. Models are idealized representations of reality established to assist the understanding of complex natural phenomena and processes; they should be designed to have both descriptive and interpretative value. In addition, and of particular value in the exploitation of economic resources, models should also have predictive power in that they should enable deductions to be made about the properties at locations for which measurements have not been taken.A wide range of alternative approaches are currently employed. These include: conceptual techniques like facies modelling and sequence stratigraphic analysis; direct numerical modelling from observations including methods such as palaeohydrology, surface (interpolation) methods, geostatistics and fractals; simulation methods such as using Markov statistics and deterministic process studies; and indirect numerical modelling such as probabilistic simulation, and the use of outcrop analogues. Each of the techniques is briefly described, and its strengths and weaknesses analysed. Subsurface prediction typically incorporates a combination of modelling philosophies in hybrid methodologies, such as a combination of forward process models based on parameters obtained from initial, inverse modelling of the data. This is probably the way forward, such as combining stochastic with process-based simulations.The validity of subsurface models depends directly on the quality of the data and the assumptions made. Current modelling approaches are fundamentally limited because of our lack of adequately detailed knowledge about present-day rivers systems",
author = "North, {Colin P.}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
day = "11",
language = "English",
isbn = "047195330X",
pages = "395--508",
editor = "Paul Carling and Martin Dawson",
booktitle = "Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The prediction and modelling of subsurface fluvial stratigraphy

AU - North, Colin P.

PY - 1996/7/11

Y1 - 1996/7/11

N2 - This review is an attempt to assess the current 'state-of-the-art' for techniques of subsurface fluvial stratigraphic analysis. It begins with a brief overview of the requirements of subsurface analysis, the limitations of the data available, and the difficulties presented by fluvial deposits in this context, then moves onto an examination of the philosophy behind modelling and the approaches that can be taken. Models are idealized representations of reality established to assist the understanding of complex natural phenomena and processes; they should be designed to have both descriptive and interpretative value. In addition, and of particular value in the exploitation of economic resources, models should also have predictive power in that they should enable deductions to be made about the properties at locations for which measurements have not been taken.A wide range of alternative approaches are currently employed. These include: conceptual techniques like facies modelling and sequence stratigraphic analysis; direct numerical modelling from observations including methods such as palaeohydrology, surface (interpolation) methods, geostatistics and fractals; simulation methods such as using Markov statistics and deterministic process studies; and indirect numerical modelling such as probabilistic simulation, and the use of outcrop analogues. Each of the techniques is briefly described, and its strengths and weaknesses analysed. Subsurface prediction typically incorporates a combination of modelling philosophies in hybrid methodologies, such as a combination of forward process models based on parameters obtained from initial, inverse modelling of the data. This is probably the way forward, such as combining stochastic with process-based simulations.The validity of subsurface models depends directly on the quality of the data and the assumptions made. Current modelling approaches are fundamentally limited because of our lack of adequately detailed knowledge about present-day rivers systems

AB - This review is an attempt to assess the current 'state-of-the-art' for techniques of subsurface fluvial stratigraphic analysis. It begins with a brief overview of the requirements of subsurface analysis, the limitations of the data available, and the difficulties presented by fluvial deposits in this context, then moves onto an examination of the philosophy behind modelling and the approaches that can be taken. Models are idealized representations of reality established to assist the understanding of complex natural phenomena and processes; they should be designed to have both descriptive and interpretative value. In addition, and of particular value in the exploitation of economic resources, models should also have predictive power in that they should enable deductions to be made about the properties at locations for which measurements have not been taken.A wide range of alternative approaches are currently employed. These include: conceptual techniques like facies modelling and sequence stratigraphic analysis; direct numerical modelling from observations including methods such as palaeohydrology, surface (interpolation) methods, geostatistics and fractals; simulation methods such as using Markov statistics and deterministic process studies; and indirect numerical modelling such as probabilistic simulation, and the use of outcrop analogues. Each of the techniques is briefly described, and its strengths and weaknesses analysed. Subsurface prediction typically incorporates a combination of modelling philosophies in hybrid methodologies, such as a combination of forward process models based on parameters obtained from initial, inverse modelling of the data. This is probably the way forward, such as combining stochastic with process-based simulations.The validity of subsurface models depends directly on the quality of the data and the assumptions made. Current modelling approaches are fundamentally limited because of our lack of adequately detailed knowledge about present-day rivers systems

M3 - Chapter

SN - 047195330X

SN - 978-0471953302

SP - 395

EP - 508

BT - Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy

A2 - Carling, Paul

A2 - Dawson, Martin

PB - John Wiley & Sons

CY - Chichester, UK

ER -