The process of government and the governmental process

G Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This review finds little utility in Bentley's famous The Process of Government. It is asserted that his book is cited as a primary source of interest group writing, bur in fact, the review argues, that this prominence is given mainly by those who want to criticise the interest group orientation. Critics commonly misinterpret the group approach as meaning that policy is the outcome of an interest group struggle: such critics seem to find in Bentley that banal and easily discredited position. The review argues that in fact Bentley's stress on group conflict was anything but coincident with interest group conflict. The charge is unfair on Bentley as it grotesquely simplifies his position and is unfair on the general interest group approach because that perspective is nor adequately summarised by a distortion of Bentley. In contrast Truman's The Governmental Process is commended as raising issues that are strikingly contemporary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)788-801
Number of pages14
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2000

Cite this

The process of government and the governmental process. / Jordan, G .

In: Political Studies, Vol. 48, No. 4, 09.2000, p. 788-801.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jordan, G . / The process of government and the governmental process. In: Political Studies. 2000 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 788-801.
@article{ac340d816b6d4da4b3d6ebf86122111b,
title = "The process of government and the governmental process",
abstract = "This review finds little utility in Bentley's famous The Process of Government. It is asserted that his book is cited as a primary source of interest group writing, bur in fact, the review argues, that this prominence is given mainly by those who want to criticise the interest group orientation. Critics commonly misinterpret the group approach as meaning that policy is the outcome of an interest group struggle: such critics seem to find in Bentley that banal and easily discredited position. The review argues that in fact Bentley's stress on group conflict was anything but coincident with interest group conflict. The charge is unfair on Bentley as it grotesquely simplifies his position and is unfair on the general interest group approach because that perspective is nor adequately summarised by a distortion of Bentley. In contrast Truman's The Governmental Process is commended as raising issues that are strikingly contemporary.",
author = "G Jordan",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9248.00283",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "788--801",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The process of government and the governmental process

AU - Jordan, G

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - This review finds little utility in Bentley's famous The Process of Government. It is asserted that his book is cited as a primary source of interest group writing, bur in fact, the review argues, that this prominence is given mainly by those who want to criticise the interest group orientation. Critics commonly misinterpret the group approach as meaning that policy is the outcome of an interest group struggle: such critics seem to find in Bentley that banal and easily discredited position. The review argues that in fact Bentley's stress on group conflict was anything but coincident with interest group conflict. The charge is unfair on Bentley as it grotesquely simplifies his position and is unfair on the general interest group approach because that perspective is nor adequately summarised by a distortion of Bentley. In contrast Truman's The Governmental Process is commended as raising issues that are strikingly contemporary.

AB - This review finds little utility in Bentley's famous The Process of Government. It is asserted that his book is cited as a primary source of interest group writing, bur in fact, the review argues, that this prominence is given mainly by those who want to criticise the interest group orientation. Critics commonly misinterpret the group approach as meaning that policy is the outcome of an interest group struggle: such critics seem to find in Bentley that banal and easily discredited position. The review argues that in fact Bentley's stress on group conflict was anything but coincident with interest group conflict. The charge is unfair on Bentley as it grotesquely simplifies his position and is unfair on the general interest group approach because that perspective is nor adequately summarised by a distortion of Bentley. In contrast Truman's The Governmental Process is commended as raising issues that are strikingly contemporary.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9248.00283

DO - 10.1111/1467-9248.00283

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 788

EP - 801

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 4

ER -